Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 45 no. 2 (2025)

The Historical and Cultural Preservation of the Jesuit House 1730 of Cebu City Philippines

Alfonz Edward Baliwag

Discipline: history of art, architecture and design

 

Abstract:

Cultural heritage is a resemblance of the past carrying stories that are significant in today’s time hence, its preservation is paramount. This research aimed to determine the local perspectives on the preservation of the Jesuit House of 1730 in Cebu’s Parian District, focusing on its historical and cultural significance, as well as the challenges and opportunities surrounding its conservation. To elicit pertinent data regarding the topic of inquiry, a qualitative research design grounded in descriptive narrative inquiry was employed. The data was collected through semi-structured interviews with fifteen local settlers divided into two age groups (50–65 years old and 25 years old and below) and two key stakeholders from the site’s management and the local government unit (LGU). Purposive sampling was used to ensure participants represented the community’s diverse cultural experiences linked to the Jesuit House. Findings reveal a shared recognition of the Jesuit House’s cultural value but also highlight its limited visibility and awareness among locals, particularly the younger generation. Older residents recall fragments of its historical narrative, whereas many younger participants, despite being digitally active, remain largely unfamiliar with the site due to its concealed location behind a hardware store and lack of robust promotion. This gap underscores the need for a holistic, community-centered preservation strategy that goes beyond maintaining the physical structure to include educational programs, enhanced signage, digital storytelling, and increased local involvement. Challenges identified include inconsistent funding, delayed implementation of heritage policies, outdated exhibits, and insufficient communication between stakeholders, which collectively hinder the site’s full cultural potential. Meanwhile, opportunities exist in expanding educational outreach, leveraging social media platforms, modernizing exhibits, and improving the museum’s spatial organization through future expansion initiatives. The research concludes that the Jesuit House’s sustainable preservation depends on a balanced approach combining community participation, innovative public-private partnerships, and integration of traditional heritage values with modern engagement techniques. Such efforts can transform the Jesuit House from a concealed relic into a dynamic cultural landmark that embodies and celebrates Cebu’s rich history for present and future generations.



References:

  1. Aas, C., Ladkin, A., & Fletcher, J. (2005). Stakeholder Collaboration and Heritage Management. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(1), 28–48.
  2. Ashworth, G. J., & Tunbridge, J. E. (1990). The Tourist-Historic City: Retrospect and Prospect of Managing the Heritage City. Belhaven Press.
  3. Avrami, E., Mason, R., & de la Torre, M. (2000). Values and Heritage Conservation: Getty Conservation Institute.
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Vol. 2. Research designs (pp. 57-71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
  5. Cameron, C. M., & Gatewood, J. B. (2006). Making history public: The story of the Civil War Trust. University of North Carolina Press.
  6. Chen, J. S., & Kerstetter, D. L. (1999). International Students’ Image of Rural Pennsylvania as a Travel Destination. Journal of Travel Research, 37(3), 256–266.
  7. Chirikure, S., & Pwiti, G. (2008). Community Involvement in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Management: An Assessment from Case Studies in Southern Africa and Elsewhere. Current Anthropology, 49(3), 467–485
  8. Chong, K.Y. & Balasingam, A.S. (2019) “Tourism sustainability: economic benefits and strategies for preservation and conservation of heritage sites in Southeast Asia”, Tourism Review, Vol. 74 No. 2, pp. 268-279. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-11-2017-0182
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousands Oaks: Sage
  10. De la Torre, M. (Ed.). (2002). Assessing the Values of Cultural Heritage. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute.
  11. Flores, M. J. (2018). Preserving Cebu’s Colonial Heritage: A Study of the Jesuit House of 1730. Journal of Philippine Heritage Studies, 14(2), 45-58
  12. Graham, B., Ashworth, G. J., & Tunbridge, J. E. (2000). A Geography of Heritage: Power, Culture, and Economy: Arnold.
  13. Harrison, R. (2013). Heritage: Critical Approaches. New York: Routledge.
  14. Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2000). Museums and the Interpretation of Visual Culture. Routledge.
  15. Javellana, R. B. (1987). The Jesuit House of 1730. Philippine Studies, 35(2), 210–221. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42633004
  16. Jones, S. (2017). Wrestling with the Social Value of Heritage: Problems, Dilemmas and Opportunities. Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage, 4(1), 21-37.
  17. Lowenthal, D. (1985). The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Maksimovic, M., & Cosovic, M. (2019). Preservation of Cultural Heritage Sites using IoT. IEEE Explore. https://doi.org/10.1109/infoteh.2019.8717658
  19. McAdams, D. P., & McLean, K. C. (2013). Narrative identity. Current directions in psychological science, 22(3), 233-238.
  20. McKercher, B., & du Cros, H. (2002). Cultural Tourism: The Partnership Between Tourism and Cultural Heritage Management. London: Routledge.
  21. Mesas-Carrascosa, F. J., Verdú, S. D., Meroño de Larriva, J. E., Ortíz Cordero, R., Hidalgo Fernández, R. E., & García-Ferrer, A. (2016). Monitoring heritage buildings with open source hardware sensors: A case study of the Mosque-Cathedral of Córdoba. Sensors, 16(1620), 1–16.
  22. Meskell, L. (2009). Global Heritage: A Reader. Wiley-Blackwell.
  23. Miles, M & Huberman, A. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  24. Mojares, R. (1983). The theater of memory: Cultural politics and literary history in the Philippines. Ateneo de Manila University Press.
  25. Nuryanti, W. (1996). Heritage and Postmodern Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 23(2), 249–260.
  26. Poulios, I. (2014). The Past in the Present: A Living Heritage Approach – Meteora, Greece. Springer.
  27. Pustz, J. (2018). Voices from the Back Stairs: Interpreting Servants’ Lives at Historic House Museums.
  28. Repetti, W., S.J. (n.d.). Jesuit mission archives and pictorial records [Unpublished manuscript]. Cited in Javellana (1987).
  29. Romarate, O. J. (2024, March 15). Interview on the preservation and promotion of the Jesuit House of 1730 [Interview]. Cultural and Historical Affairs Office (CHAO), Cebu City.
  30. Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. New York: Routledge.
  31. Silberman, N. A. (2011). Heritage Interpretation and Community Involvement. In The Oxford Handbook of Public Archaeology (pp. 408-428). Oxford University Press.
  32. Sugiyono, P. D. (2014). Metode Penelitian Manajemen. Yogyakarta: Alfabeta, CV.
  33. Timothy, D. J., & Boyd, S. W. (2003). Heritage Tourism. Harlow: Pearson Education.
  34. UNESCO. (2013). The Hangzhou Declaration: Placing Culture at the Heart of Sustainable Development Policies
  35. Waterton, E., & Smith, L. (2010). The Recognition and Misrecognition of Community Heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(1-2), 4–15.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic