Home⇛Information Generation & Management⇛vol. 4 no. 2 (2025)

Awareness and Use of Plagiarism Detection Tools: A Correlational

Oluchi Cecilia Okeke | Bolaji David Oladokun | Iyanu Emmanuel Olatunbosun

Discipline: library and information science

 

Abstract:

Statement of the Problem. The issue of plagiarism has gained significant attention due to its detrimental impact on the quality and integrity of research. Plagiarism not only undermines the credibility of scholarly work but also hinders the development of critical thinking and originality among researchers. While the proliferation of online resources has made accessing information easier, it has also inadvertently increased the potential for plagiarism. Despite the availability of numerous plagiarism detection tools, there seems to be a lack of comprehensive understanding among LIS postgraduate students in Nigerian library schools regarding the existence, features, and benefits of these tools. This study examined the awareness and use of plagiarism detection tools among Library and Information Science postgraduate students in Nigerian universities and explored the relationship between awareness and actual usage. Method. A correlational research design was used, and data were collected from 146 students across ten universities through a validated questionnaire. The data were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. Results. The findings revealed high awareness and strong use of Turnitin, moderate awareness and use of EagleScan, and comparatively lower engagement with the Third Eye tool. Significant positive relationships were found between awareness and usage of all three tools, showing that students who are more knowledgeable about plagiarism checkers are more likely to apply them in their research. The results further indicate that these tools contribute to student learning beyond compliance by supporting improved citation practices, paraphrasing skills, and originality. Originality. To the best of the researchers’ knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the awareness and usage of specific plagiarism detection tools among Library and Information Science postgraduate students in Nigeria. By establishing a significant link between awareness and practical use, it provides novel empirical evidence crucial for shaping effective academic integrity training and policy in library schools.



References:

  1. Abeyranthne, D. K. (2015). Citation analysis of dissertations for collection  development. Collection Building, 34(2), 30-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/CB-11-2014-0055
  2. Applegate, R. (2013). Practical evaluation techniques for librarians. In Practical  evaluation techniques for librarians. Libraries Unlimited, an Imprint of ABC CLIO, LLC.
  3. Becker, D. A., & Chiware, E. R. (2015). Citation analysis of masters' theses and  doctoral dissertations: Balancing library collections with students' research  information needs. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(5), 613–620.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.06.022
  4. Currie, L., & Monroe-Gulick, A. (2013). What do our faculty use? An interdisciplinary  citation analysis study. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(6), 471–480.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2013.08.016
  5. Datig, I. (2015). Walking in your users' shoes: An introduction to user experience  research as a tool for developing user-centered libraries. Behavioral and Social  Sciences, 22(3–4), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2015.1060143
  6. Eclevia, M. R. (2014). When counting is not enough: Current realities of DLSU  Libraries' science resources using combined collection assessment methods.  [Paper presentation]. Green Spine 2014: Sizing Up Your Collection: Approaches in Assessing and Developing Your Library’s Resources, De La Salle University,  Manila, Philippines.
  7. Eclevia, M. R., & Janio, R. V. (2016, November 22–25). What do faculty use?  Investigating faculty research productivity and citation behavior of Filipino  engineering faculty [Paper presentation]. Philippine Librarians Association, Inc.  (PLAI) National Congress 2016, SMX Convention Center, SM Lanang, Davao  City, Philippines.
  8. Faniel, I. M., Brannon, B., Langa, L. A., Doyle, B., & van der Werf, T. (2024).  Improving open access discovery for academic library users (OCLC Research  Report). OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. https://doi.org/10.25333/4xem-xr80
  9. Fiala, D. (2022). Indonesia's place in the research landscape of Southeast Asia.  Unisia, 40(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.20885/unisia.vol40.iss1.art3
  10. Harker, K., Condrey, C., & Crawford, L. (2019). The collection assessment is done…  now what? Purpose about collection management. International Conference on  Performance Measurement in Libraries.
  11. Hoffmann, K., & Doucette, L. (2012). A review of citation analysis methodologies for  collection management. College and Research Libraries, 73(4), 321-335.  https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-254
  12. Jantzi, L., Richard, J., & Wong, S. (2016). Managing discovery and linking services.  Serials Librarian, 70(1-4), 184-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2016.1153331.
  13. Johnson, P. (2018). Fundamentals of collection development and management (4th ed.). ALA Editions. 
  14. Joson, C. G. (2018). Citation analysis of doctoral students' dissertations of Philippine  Women's University School of Education: Tool for collection development.  Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 4700. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4700/
  15. Kelly, M. (2015). Citation patterns of engineering, statistics, and computer science  researchers: An internal and external citation analysis across multiple  engineering subfields. College and Research Libraries, 76(7), 859–882.  https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.76.7.859
  16. Khan. (2023). Do open access journals have a greater citation impact? A study of  journals in library and information science. Collection Building, 42(1) 13-24.  https://doi.org/10.1108/CC-03-2022-0010
  17. Klebel, T., Traag, V., Grypari, I., Stoy, L., & Ross-Hellauer, T. (2025). The academic  impact of open science: A scoping review. Royal Society Open Science, 12(2),  241248. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241248
  18. Kohn, K. (2015). Collection evaluation in academic libraries: a practical guide for  librarians. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  19. Lynch, J. (2016). Teaching the vocabulary of citation: Action research in a Southeast  Asian context. PASAA, 52(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.PASAA.52.1.1
  20. Macgregor, G. (2020). Enhancing content discovery of open repositories: An  analytics-based evaluation of repository optimizations. Publications (Basel),  8(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications8010008
  21. Martindale, T. (2020). More than collection development: Using local citation analysis  to begin a career in business librarianship. Collection Management, 45(4), 321– 334. https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2020.1715315
  22. Marzuki, M., Azero, S. F. Z., Zamzuri, N. A. A. M., & Kadir, M.R.A. (2025). A  systematic literature review of user behavior and personalization in digital  libraries. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science  (IJRISS), 9(01), 4830-4842. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.9010372
  23. Musser, L., & Coopey, B. (2016). Impact of a discovery system on interlibrary loan.  College & Research Libraries, 77(5), 643-653. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.77.5.643.
  24. Pastva, J., Shank, J., Gutzman, K. E., Kaul, M., & Kubilius, R. K. (2018). Capturing  and analyzing publication, citation, and usage data for contextual collection  development. The Serials Librarian, 74(1–4), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2018.1427996
  25. Peñaflor, J., & Aliwalas, A. (2022). Research output and information use: A citation  analysis of faculty publications in engineering. Collection Management, 47(4),  300–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2022.2081830
  26. Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B.,  Farley, A., West, J., & Haustein, S. (2018). The state of OA: A large-scale  analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ, 6,  e4375. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375
  27. Pourghasemian, H. , Shahiditabar, M. and Baqerzadeh Hosseini, M. (2018). Citation  behaviour and intertextuality in EFL writing: The case of EFL writers'  undergraduate projects and their MA theses compared. Journal of Modern  Research in English Language Studies, 5(3), 31-54. doi:10.30479/jmrels.2019.10684.1336
  28. Rasaq, A. M., Yusuf, A. O., Nuhu, S. R., & Ibrahim, A. M. (2024). Citation analysis of  library and information science undergraduates' projects in Kwara State.
  29. University, Malete (2013-2018). Inkunabula: Journal of Library Science and  Islamic Information, 3(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.24239/inkunabula.v3i1.3002
  30. Saura, Y., & Darya, W. (2023). The forms of citation practices in the undergraduate  students' theses in English language teaching. STAIRS: English Language  Education Journal, 4(1), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.21009/stairs.4.1.2
  31. Suherman, L. O. A., Rahman, F., Eryck, M. F., & Munirah, M. (2022). Plagiarism  occur in students' academic work: Exploring impact the EFL (English as Foreign  Language) undergraduate students' plagiarism in theses writing. ZONAsi:  Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.31849/zn.v4i1.9647
  32. Syahid, A. (2020). Open access journals in the member states of the association of  Southeast Asian Nations. International Journal of Information Science and  Management (IJISM), 18(2), 33–49. https://ijism.isc.ac/article_698322_6978d52be7d1e258132c23e660ba7177.pdf
  33. Szpunar, R., Bradley, E., Gabrielson, E., & Pellegrino, C. (2025). Irrelevant discovery  layers? An evidence-based evaluation of three common library search tools.  Information Technology and Libraries, 44(2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.5860/ital.v44i2.17266
  34. Tenopir, C., King, D. W., Christian, L., & Volentine, R. (2015). Scholarly article  seeking, reading, and use: A continuing evolution from print to electronic in the  sciences and social sciences. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 93-105.  https://doi.org/10.1087/20150203
  35. Thakuria, A., Deka, D., & Chakraborty, I. (2024). Comparative analysis of impact,  collaboration, and prestige of open access and subscription based LIS journals  using SJR and Scopus indicators. International Information & Library Review,  56(4), 384-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2024.2409603
  36. Thomas, W. J., Vandagriff, S., & Jabaily, M. J. (2022). Student use of library provided materials: Citation analysis across three fields of study and using local  citation analysis for improving serials collections. Serials Librarian, 82(1–4), 154- 163. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2022.2018242
  37. Tucker, C. (2013). Analyzing faculty citations for effective collection management  decisions. Library Collections, Acquisition and Technical Services, 37(1–2), 19– 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcats.2013.06.001
  38. Walton, K., Childs, G. M., & Palumbo, L. (2022). Testing two discovery systems: A  usability study comparing student perceptions of EDS and Primo. Journal of  Web Librarianship, 16(4), 200–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2022.2125478
  39. White, P. B. (2019). Using data mining for citation analysis. College and Research  Libraries, 80(1), 76-93. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.1.76
  40. Wilson, E. K. (2012). Citation analysis of undergraduate honors theses. The  Southeastern Librarian, 60(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.62915/0038-3686.1425

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic