Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 45 no. 4 (2025)

STATReels: Exploring Students' Engagement and Attitudes Toward Video Supplementary Materials in a Blended Probability and Statistics Class

Lowelyn Colmo | Annie Solinap

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This action research explored the experiences of first-year Bachelor of Science in Information Technology (BSIT) students regarding their engagement and attitudes towards a blended Probability and Statistics class at a state university in the Western Visayas region, Philippines. The intervention involved STATReels, a series of 4-minute instructional videos designed to address the abstract nature of the subject by presenting complex information in manageable, visually and audibly rich segments, guided by Mayer's Multimedia Learning and Sweller's Cognitive Load theories. Adopting a qualitative methodology, the study utilized a purposive sample of six BSIT students demonstrating low initial engagement. Data was gathered through observation notes, in-depth interview transcripts, and student reflective journals. Thematic Analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006) was employed to identify recurring patterns. Findings indicate that STATReels supported student engagement and fostered positive attitudes by offering clear visual examples, enabling self-paced learning, and making abstract concepts more tangible and accessible. This contributed to increased interest and motivation, enhanced conceptual understanding, and greater accessibility of learning materials. The intervention also helped foster confidence and alleviate anxiety. The study concludes that integrating such multimedia tools can address learning challenges in abstract subjects, potentially leading to improved student outcomes, motivation, and positive attitudes in blended higher education settings.



References:

  1. Al-Hariri, M. T., & Al-Hattami, A. A. (2017). Impact of students’ use of technology on their learning achievements in physiology courses at the University of Dammam. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 12(1), 82–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2016.07.004
  2. Aloraini, S. (2012). The Impact of Using Multimedia on Students’ Academic Achievement in the College of Education at King Saud University. Journal of King Saud University–Languages and Translation, 24(2), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksult.2012.05.002
  3. Anyayahan, C. M. (2022). The use of reels in enhancing vocabulary learning. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 18(2), 12–25.
  4. Arinto, P. B. (2016). Issues and challenges in open and distance e-learning: Perspectives from the Philippines. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 162–180.
  5. Atilano-Tang, L. A., & Cirilo, M. F. (2023). Improving Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age: Recommendations for Teachers of the Department of Education in Zamboanga City, Philippines. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4536896
  6. Backfisch, I., Behringer, N., & Ossenberg, C. (2021). Digital learning resources for mathematics: A systematic review of empirical studies. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 215–244.
  7. Barzegar, N., Farjad, S., & Hosseini, N. (2012). The effect of teaching models based on multimedia and traditional methods on learning and retention of students. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5400–5404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.445
  8. Beyers, R. N. (2011). Student engagement and learning: The role of self-efficacy and attitudes in predicting statistics performance. Journal of Statistics Education, 19(1).
  9. Bisht, S. (2024). Purposeful sampling in qualitative education research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23(1), 1–9.
  10. Borysiuk, A. (2013). Integrating ICT into education: Challenges and strategies. In Shatri, A. (2020). Digital learning in the 21st century (pp. 59–74). Oxford Press.
  11. Bourner, T., & Brook, C. (2019). Action learning: A vital step in action research. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 16(2), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2019.1591481
  12. Bravo, E., Amante, B., Simó, P., Enache, M., & Fernandez, V. (2011). Video as a New Teaching Tool to Increase Student Motivation. In 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 638–642). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2011.5773205
  13. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293–332. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2
  14. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
  15. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  16. Dalacosta, K., Kamariotaki-Paparrigopoulou, M., Palyvos, J. A., & Spyrellis, N. (2009). Multimedia application with animated cartoons for teaching science in elementary education. Computers & Education, 52(4), 741–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.018
  17. Dela Cruz, R. P., Mendoza, A., & Javier, M. (2023). Integrating TikTok reels in EFL vocabulary instruction. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research, 11(1), 77–83.
  18. DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(1), 263–287.
  19. Donkor, F. (2011). Assessment of learner acceptance and satisfaction with video-based instructional materials for teaching practical skills at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(5), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i5.953
  20. Fitria, T. N. (2023). Digital reels in language learning. Journal of Language and Education Innovation, 12(3), 55–65.
  21. Friel, S. N. (2000). The impact of video-based learning in statistics education: A study on the role of technology in shaping the learning experience. Journal of Statistics Education, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2000.11910695
  22. Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Developing students’ statistical reasoning: Connecting research and teaching practice. Springer.
  23. Gaucho, A. (2020). Attitudes toward writing in online learning environments. Philippine Journal of Education, 99(1), 22–30.
  24. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.
  25. Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 333–350). Routledge.
  26. Hsin, W. J., & Cigas, J. (2013). Short videos improve student learning in online education. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 28(5), 253–259.
  27. Ibrahim, M., Antonenko, P. D., Greenwood, C. M., & Wheeler, D. (2012). Effects of segmenting, signaling, and weeding on learning from educational video. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(3), 220–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2011.585993
  28. Janda, K. B. (1992). Multimedia in education: The design and implementation of multimedia learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 2(3), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/1049482920020303
  29. Jian-hua, Z., & Hong, Z. (2012). The application of multimedia technology in college English teaching. Physics Procedia, 24, 2334–2337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.02.347
  30. Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, J. (2014). The effects of blended learning on learning motivation and students’ satisfaction in a college-level computer science course. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 51(3), 365–378.
  31. Kannan, S., & Anuradha, M. (2024). Students’ Engagement with Social Media Reels: Scope for News Outlets. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.561
  32. Kay, R. H. (2012). Exploring the use of video podcasts in education: A comprehensive review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 820–831.
  33. Kay, R. H., & LeSage, A. (2009). Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 53(3), 819–827.
  34. Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Agamba, J. (2008). Promoting effective e-learning practices through the constructivist pedagogy. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(4), 569–576.
  35. Kingsley, K. V., & Boone, R. (2008). Effects of Multimedia Software on the Achievement of Middle School Students in an American History Class. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(2), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2008.10782528
  36. Kuiper, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J. (2005). The web as an information resource in K–12 education: Strategies for supporting students in searching and processing information. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 285–328. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003285
  37. Laouadji, M. (2023). EdTech and the future of visual learning. Technology in Education Journal, 15(1), 11–22.
  38. Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
  39. Long, L. A., Logan, T., & Waugh, M. (2016). Students’ perceptions of video use in online courses. Online Learning Journal, 20(3), 43–55.
  40. Mali, D., & Lim, H. (2021). How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as they return to university during COVID-19? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00264-z
  41. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  42. Mayer, R. E. (2014). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  43. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
  44. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2013). The influence of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. U.S. Department of Education.
  45. Milovanović, M., Mladenović, M., & Stanković, Z. (2013). The Influence of Multimedia Teaching on Learning Efficiency in Computer Science Courses. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 44–50.
  46. Mosende, R. A., Sario, L. D., & Tagle, M. S. (2024). Engagement of students through short-form video platforms. Journal of Digital Education Trends, 5(2), 88–99.
  47. Mpungose, C. B. (2020). Is Moodle or WhatsApp the preferred e-learning platform at a South African university? First-year students’ experiences. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 927–941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10005-5
  48. Pagal, K., & Bosque, J. (2025). Reels and microlearning: A new era in educational technology. Asian Journal of Educational Media, 6(1), 22–33.
  49. Paudel, P. (2021). Online education: Benefits, challenges, and strategies during and after COVID-19 in higher education. International Journal on Studies in Education (IJonSE), 3(2), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.32
  50. Pei-Lin, Y. (2014). Exploring the use of micro-video in adult language education. Journal of Adult Education Research, 26(1), 101–112.
  51. Plavnick, J. B., Ferreri, S. J., & Maupin, Z. D. (2013). The Effects of Video-Based Group Instruction on Spontaneous Communication in Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal of Behavioral Education, 22(2), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-013-9169-4
  52. Puspitasari, L. A. (2024). Learning grammar through Instagram reels. ELT Echo: The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context, 9(1), 43–51.
  53. Ranasinghe, A. I., & Leisher, D. (2009). The benefits and challenges of e-learning: Lessons from Uganda. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 6(1), 51–58.
  54. Reyes, A., & del Valle, J. (2023). Exploring teacher readiness in digital pedagogy in Philippine secondary schools. Philippine Journal of Teacher Education, 11(1), 25–41.
  55. Samosa, R., Valdez, M., & Gutierrez, K. (2021). Exploring digital reels in college language instruction. Educational Innovations Journal, 15(2), 56–67.
  56. Shah, A. A., & Khan, A. (2015). Impact of multimedia-aided teaching on students’ academic achievement and attitude at the elementary level. US-China Education Review A, 5(5), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623X/2015.05.005
  57. Singleton, R. A., & Straits, B. C. (2010). Approaches to social research (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  58. Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.
  59. Yang, C. (2017). The effects of short videos in e-learning environments. E-Learning Studies, 12(2), 43–54.
  60. Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning influence. Information & Management, 43(1), 15–27.
  61. Zin, N. A. M., Nasir, N. A. M., & Ghazali, N. (2013). Multimedia learning in teaching mathematics: A Malaysian perspective. Education Technology Journal, 6(1), 44–52.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic