Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 45 no. 10 (2025)

Ethos, Pathos, and Logos: Examining the Rhetorical Strategies of Empowerment Narratives Using Discourse Analysis

Aileen Escote | Michelle Viña

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study examines how regional beauty queens shape persuasive narratives that empower communities and inspire action, with a focus on how these narratives are constructed with ethos, pathos, and logos on the rhetorical strategies employed by contestants in the Mutya ng Cotabato pageants from 2022 to 2024. Using discourse analysis as its primary method, the study investigates coronation night speeches to understand how beauty queens use language, personal stories, emotional appeal, and logical reasoning to advocate for social causes and assert leadership. The findings show that ethos is the most frequently used strategy, as candidates often draw from personal experiences and connections with credible institutions to build trust and authenticity. Pathos follows closely, with contestants using vivid imagery, cultural references, and emotional storytelling to foster unity and pride among Cotabateños. While logos appears less often, it plays a critical role in strengthening arguments with evidence and rational perspectives on social issues. This study adds to the growing recognition of beauty pageants as platforms for civic engagement and meaningful public discourse. By analyzing how rhetorical strategies are employed, the study offers a fresh perspective on pageantry— not just as a showcase of beauty, but as a space where young women develop their voices as advocates and leaders. Ultimately, the findings illustrate how beauty queens are evolving into influential public figures, capable of inspiring change and promoting empowerment within and beyond their communities.



References:

  1. Alcantara, R. M. (2022). Beauty queens in the digital age: social media, advocacy, and performative activism in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Communication and Media Studies, 10(2), 45–60.
  2. Aristotle. (2007). On rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse (G. A. Kennedy, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
  3. Basas, C. (2021). Pageantry and public perception: Shifting paradigms of beauty and advocacy in Filipino culture. Journal of Southeast Asian Cultural Studies, 6(1), 88–105.
  4. Basow, S. A. (2021). Gender and the media: A critical introduction. Routledge.
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  6. Bucholtz, M. (2000). The politics of transcription. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1439-1465.
  7. Cardoza, K., & Parameswaran, R. (2009). Melanin on the margins: Advertising and the cultural politics of fair/light/white beauty in India. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 11(3), 213–274.
  8. Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan.
  9. Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
  10. Cochrane, K. (2014). Women, political philosophy, and politics. Oxford University Press.
  11. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among        five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  12. Cruz, L. M. (2012). The evolution of beauty pageants in the Philippines: Identity and empowerment. Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(3), 230-248.
  13. Davis, J. (2022). Persuasion and influence: How to influence and persuade people in the workplace. Pearson.
  14. Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). The influence of affective appeals on persuasive messages: The role of emotion in social change. Journal of Communication, 55(2),      360-380.
  15. Fairclough, N. (2003). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
  16. Fernandez, S., & Valerio, M. (Eds.). (2023). The power of beauty: Insights from the pageant industry on beauty, branding, and empowerment. Routledge.
  17. Foss, S. K. (2009). Rhetorical criticism: Exploration and practice (4th ed.). Waveland Press.
  18. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. Pantheon Books.
  19. Gass, R. H., & Seiter, J. S. (2018). Persuasion: Social Influence and Compliance Gaining (6th ed.). Routledge.
  20. Gill, R. (2020). Gender and the media. Polity Press.
  21. Gill, R. (2020). Gender and the media: The power of representation in the 21st century. Polity Press.
  22. Heinrichs, J. (2017). Thank you for arguing: What Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson can teach us about the art of persuasion. Three Rivers Press.
  23. Jamieson, K. H. (1998). The rhetoric of women’s leadership. In L. K. H. English (Ed.), The handbook of rhetoric and public address (pp. 405-434). Wiley-Blackwell.
  24. Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant!: Know your values and frame the debate. Chelsea Green Publishing.
  25. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
  26. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
  27. Lunsford, A. A. (2010). The rhetorical canon: An introduction to the principles of composition. Oxford University Press.
  28. McCroskey, J. C. (2001). An introduction to rhetorical communication. Pearson.
  29. Mendoza, J. A. (2023). Rhetoric, representation, and regional pageants: The role of discourse in Mutya ng Cotabato. Mindanao Journal of Social Research, 8(1), 57–72.
  30. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  31. Nabi, R. L. (2002). The theoretical versus the lay meaning of discrete Emotions. Communication Monographs, 69(3), 291–317.
  32. Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge University Press.
  33. Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In S. Phillips, & A. I. Irvine (Eds.), Natural language and social cognition (pp. 43-72). Cambridge University Press.
  34. Ortony, A. (1993). Metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press.
  35. Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.
  36. Parameswaran, R., & Cardoza, K. (2009). Melanin on the margins: Advertising and the cultural politics of fairness in India. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 11(3), 213–274.
  37. Perloff, R. M. (2020). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the 21st century (6th ed.). Routledge.
  38. Pineda-Ofreneo, R. (2015). The role of beauty pageants in women’s empowerment in the Philippines. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 21(3), 253-268.
  39. Pruitt, L. J. (2021). Beauty with a cause: A feminist analysis of pageantry and empowerment narratives. Feminist Media Studies, 21(4), 512–528.
  40. Rodriguez, T. M. (2023). Beauty, rhetoric, and regional identity: Narratives of empowerment in Mindanao pageants. Philippine Review of Communication and Society, 12(1), 91–107.
  41. Santos, L. V. (2023). Empowered or performed? The risks of digital activism in online beauty pageants. Journal of New Media and Society in Asia, 9(2), 105–121.
  42. Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument (Updated ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  43. Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
  44. Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitive approach. Sage Publications.
  45. West, L. A. (2020). Crowning change: The transformation of beauty queens into cultural ambassadors. Media and Society Journal, 14(3), 175–193.
  46. West, R., & Fernandez, S. (2020). Beauty pageants and cultural representation: Performing gender, race, and nationality. Palgrave Macmillan.
  47. Westen, D. (2007). The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation. PublicAffairs.
  48. Wiles, R., Crow, G., & Heath, S. (2008). The nature of qualitative data in social research. Researching Social Life, 16, 48-69.
  49. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  50. Wodak, R. (Ed.). (2021). The discourse studies reader: Main currents in theory and analysis. Routledge.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic