Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 47 no. 1 (2025)

Culturally Responsive Teaching Practices and Student Engagement in Social Studies

Denaiah Sweet Quimot | Noriza Esteban

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study examined the extent of culturally responsive teaching practices among Social Studies teachers and their perceived impact on student engagement in the Division of Valencia City for the school year 2024-2025. The research utilized a descriptive-correlational and predictive design to determine the level of culturally responsive teaching practices, student engagement, their relationship, and whether culturally responsive teaching practices dimensions predict engagement levels. Data were collected from social studies teachers using a standardized questionnaire. Descriptive statistics illustrated that culturally responsive teaching practices were frequently implemented, with "Establishing Inclusion" being the most evident and "Engendering Competence" showing the most room for improvement. Student engagement was high, with "Affective Engagement" ranking the highest, while "Cognitive Engagement" was the least evident. Correlation analysis revealed no significant relationship between culturally responsive teaching practices and student engagement. Regression analysis further indicated that no culturally responsive teaching dimensions significantly predicted student engagement. While "Developing Attitudes" showed a positive but non-significant association, "Enhancing Meanings" displayed a negative coefficient. These findings suggest that culturally responsive teaching practices alone do not directly influence student engagement, highlighting the need to consider other contributing factors such as instructional strategies, curriculum design, and student motivation. The study concludes that while culturally responsive teaching practices foster inclusivity, their direct effect on student engagement is limited. It recommends that education stakeholders, including division supervisors, school heads, and teachers, integrate complementary strategies such as interactive instructional methods and student-centered learning approaches to enhance engagement in Social Studies. Future research may explore additional pedagogical factors that contribute to meaningful student participation.



References:

  1. Akbari, R., & Khatib, M. (2023). The role of teacher feedback on student engagement in social studies classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(2), 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000598
  2. Alardhi, Y., & Hodge, S. J. (2024). Culturally responsive leadership: A critical analysis of one school district's five-year plan. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1385788. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1385788
  3. Alardhi, Y., & Hodge, S. J. (2024). Culturally responsive teaching and its impact on student engagement in social studies: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1416095. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1416095
  4. Alonzo, R.M., & De Guzman, A.B. (2021). Culturally responsive teaching practices among Filipino teachers: Challenges and opportunities in a diverse educational landscape. Philippine Journal of Education, 99(1), 45-67.
  5. Aronson, B., Lewis, J., & Smith, K.A. (2020). Critical race theory and culturally responsive teaching: A framework for educational equity in K-12 schools. Journal of Educational Equity, 12(1), 45–67.
  6. Arunkumar, R., Choudhury, S., & Bhatia, R. (2020). Culturally responsive teaching: Bridging the achievement gap. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101112
  7. Barlow, L., & Sweeney, D. (2022). Culturally responsive teaching in the digital age: Strategies for online learning environments. Journal of Online Learning Research, 8(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jolr.2022.01.001
  8. Bautista, E.M. (2020). Exploring the factors influencing student engagement in social studies among Filipino high school students. Asia Pacific Journal of Education,40(3),345-360.
  9. Bautista, E.M. (2020). The influence of culturally relevant materials on student engagement in Philippine classrooms. International Journal of Educational Innovations, 7(3), 145-159.
  10. Bonner, F.A., & Adams, A.M. (2022). Culturally responsive teaching: Insights from student perspectives on inclusive practices in social studies education. Journal of International Students, 12(1), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v12i1.488
  11. Bulaong, J.M., & Asuncion, J.V. (2019). Integrating culturally responsive teaching in the Philippine basic education curriculum. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 6(2), 23-36.
  12. Burch, P., & Spillane, J.P. (2019). Leading for equity: The role of school leaders in promoting culturally responsive teaching practices. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(2), 179–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18822198
  13. Caingcoy, M. E., Lorenzo, V. I. M., Ramirez, I. A. L., Libertad, C. D., Pabiona Jr., R. G., & Mier, R. M. C. (2022). Assessing Practice Teachers' Culturally Responsive Teaching: The Role of Gender and Degree Programs in Competence Development. IAFOR Journal of Cultural Studies, 7(1). DOI: 10.22492/ijcs.7.1.02
  14. Cruz, R.M. (2020). Bridging cultural gaps through responsive teaching strategies in Philippine classrooms. Philippine Educational Research and Development Journal, 18(2), 102–118.
  15. Cruz, R.M. (2022). The impact of culturally relevant pedagogy on student engagement in Philippine social studies education. Philippine Journal of Educational Research,15(1),78–90.
  16. Cummings, C., & Wiggins, R.A. (2021). The impact of culturally relevant pedagogy on student engagement in high school social studies classrooms. Social Studies Research and Practice, 16(1), 45–61.
  17. De Leon, M.V. (2020). The impact of culturally relevant pedagogy on student engagement in Philippine higher education. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 40(3), 345–360.
  18. Dela Cruz, M.B. (2023). Enhancing cultural competence among pre-service teachers through culturally responsive training programs. Philippine Journal of Teacher Training and Development, 11(1), 88-102.
  19. Dela Cruz, M.B. (2023). Enhancing student engagement through project-based learning in social studies: Evidence from Philippine schools. Philippine Journal of Teacher Education,11(1),88-102.
  20. Dickson, K., & Hodge, S.J. (2023). Assessing teachers' culturally responsive classroom practice and its impact on student engagement in diverse settings. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 31(20). https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231208720
  21. Duran, L., & Duran, A.P. (2023). Culturally responsive teaching and its effects on student motivation: A case study in urban schools. Urban Education, 58(4), 543-570. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859211012345
  22. Emdin, C., & Gonzalez, A. (2020). Culturally relevant pedagogy and the role of the teacher in fostering student engagement in science education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(2), 129-145.
  23. Enerio, A. Jr. (2023). Factors and levels of student engagement in a state college. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v24i1.4716
  24. Garcia-Cabral, R. (2019). Factors affecting student engagement in social studies classes among Filipino learners. Philippine Journal of Educational Administration,22(1),33-47.
  25. Garcia-Cabral, R. (2022). Challenges faced by teachers implementing culturally responsive practices in Philippine schools. Philippine Journal of Educational Administration, 22(1), 33-47.
  26. Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
  27. Gorski, P.C., & Pothini, S.K. (2018). An educator's guide to equity: Culturally responsive teaching and the role of social justice in education. Educational Leadership, 76(7), 36-41.
  28. Gürer, B., & Yildirim, S. (2024). Development of the "Social Studies Course Engagement Scale" for elementary school students: A psychometric study. Journal of Educational Foundations, 25(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.1284700
  29. Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E.L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure, but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019682
  30. Ladson-Billings, G. (2021). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: A new vision for transforming pedagogy. Harvard Education Press.
  31. Limjoco, R.J. (2019). The effectiveness of culturally responsive teaching strategies on student learning outcomes in the Philippines. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 5(4), 274-283.
  32. Limjoco, R.J. (2020). The role of teacher-student relationships in promoting student engagement in Philippine social studies classrooms. Philippine Educational Research and Development Journal,18(2),102-118.
  33. Mendoza, J. M. (2021). Culturally responsive teaching practices and their impact on student engagement in Philippine higher education. Journal of Southeast Asian Education Research,6(1),34-50.
  34. Mendoza, J.M. (2021). The role of cultural identity in shaping pedagogical approaches among Filipino educators. Philippine Journal of Teacher Education, 8(1), 55-70.
  35. Mercer, S., & Williams, M. (2019). Student engagement in foreign language learning: A longitudinal study of motivational factors and classroom dynamics in social studies contexts. Language Learning Journal, 47(3), 295–309.
  36. Moran, J.C. (2020). Culturally responsive teaching: Its application in higher education environments. Education Sciences, 10(5), 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10050124
  37. O'Neal, C.R., Zhang, Y., & Khajavy, G.H. (2018). The relationship between student engagement and academic performance in social studies: A meta-analysis of recent studies. Educational Research Review, 24, 68–79.
  38. Ocakcı, E., & Samancı, O. (2024). Development of the "Social Studies Course Engagement Scale" for elementary school students: Implications for practice and policy in social studies education. Journal of Educational Foundations, 25(1), 15-30.
  39. Paris, D., & Alim, H.S. (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A change in stance and practice for social studies educators. Harvard Education Press.
  40. Paris, D., & Alim, H.S. (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Harvard Education Press.
  41. Pineda, J.V. (2019). Assessing the effectiveness of interactive learning strategies on student engagement in social studies. International Journal of Educational Innovations,7(3),145–159.
  42. Pineda, J.V. (2019). Assessing the impact of culturally responsive teaching on academic performance among Filipino students. Journal of Philippine Education Studies, 17(2), 76–89.
  43. Quin, D., Hemphill, L., & Heerde, J.A.V.D. (2017). The role of teacher-student relationships in fostering student engagement in social studies classrooms: A longitudinal study. Social Psychology of Education, 20(4), 739-758.
  44. Ramos, T. J. (2020). Student engagement through collaborative learning strategies in Philippine social studies education. Philippine Journal of Inclusive Education,10(1),25–39.
  45. Ramos, T.J. (2021). Culturally responsive teaching to promote equity and inclusion in Philippine education. Philippine Journal of Inclusive Education, 10(1), 25–39.
  46. Reyes, R.B. (2023). Culturally sustaining pedagogy as a framework for inclusive education in Philippine schools. Philippine Journal of Special Education, 12(2), 112–130.
  47. Reyes, R. B. (2023). The influence of family background on student engagement levels in Philippine social studies classes. Philippine Journal of Special Education,12(2),112–130.
  48. Shernoff, D.J., et al. (2016). Student engagement as a key ingredient for student success: A literature review on student engagement in K-12 education. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 100-126.
  49. Torres-Perez, D. (2022). Strategies for implementing culturally relevant pedagogy in Filipino higher education institutions. Philippine Higher Education Review, 14(3), 99-115.
  50. Torres-Perez, D. (2024). Strategies for enhancing student engagement through technology integration in Philippine social studies education. Philippine Higher Education Review,14(3),99-115.
  51. Van den Berghe, L., et al. (2016). The relationship between teacher autonomy support and student engagement in social studies: The mediating role of need satisfaction. Learning and Instruction, 41, 21-29.
  52. Villanueva, M.V. (2018). Teacher perceptions of culturally responsive teaching in a multicultural classroom setting in the Philippines. Journal of Southeast Asian Education Research, 6(1), 34-50.
  53. Villanueva, M.V. (2018). Teacher perceptions on the impact of culturally relevant materials on student engagement in Philippine classrooms. Journal of Philippine Education Studies,17(2),76-89.
  54. Wang, M.T., & Eccles, J.S. (2012). Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on academic engagement and achievement during early adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 36(1), 65–76.
  55. Young, E.J., & Youngs, P.T. (2019). Challenges to conceptualizing and actualizing culturally relevant pedagogy: How viable is the theory in classroom practice? Journal of Teacher Education, 70(2), 148–160.
  56. Youngblood-Baluyot, M.A. (2023). Evaluating the effectiveness of gamification strategies on enhancing student engagement in social studies among Filipino students. Philippine Journal of Educational Technology,19(1),45-60.
  57. Zamora, J. C. (2020). Understanding the role of peer interactions on student engagement levels during group work activities in Philippine social studies classes. Asian Journal of Education and Training,5(4),274-283.
  58. Zhang, H., & Wang, Y. (2023). Exploring the impact of culturally responsive teaching on student engagement in diverse classrooms: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 116, Article 101-112.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic