Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 47 no. 2 (2025)

Assessing Teachers’ Perspective on the Implementation of MATATAG Curriculum

Cindy Pearl Parojenog | Wilfredo Miasco Jr

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study investigates teachers’ perspectives on the implementation of the MATATAG curriculum, particularly their experiences, challenges, and well-being. Utilizing a mixed-method research design, data were collected from Grade 7 teachers at Libona National High School through survey questionnaires. Results show that while teachers view the curriculum as aligned with national standards and beneficial to student learning, its practical implementation is hindered by insufficient training, limited instructional resources, and increased workload. Demographic factors such as age, experience, and grade level assignment also shape teachers' views, with more experienced educators reporting greater concerns over adaptability and workload management. The study further reveals that teachers experience moderate levels of well-being, with emotional, physical, and professional stress linked to the curriculum's demands. Teachers emphasized the importance of continuous training, adequate learning materials, and reducing administrative duties to improve their instructional delivery. Moreover, they stressed the importance of collaboration among key stakeholders—school leaders, policymakers, and communities—to effectively support curriculum implementation. In response to these findings, the study recommends structured and ongoing professional development tailored to the specific needs of teachers, enhanced provision of teaching resources, and reduced non-teaching responsibilities. It also suggests improved curriculum monitoring and evaluation practices, along with strengthened support systems through mentorship, stakeholder engagement, and government-led initiatives. These measures are vital to ensuring the MATATAG curriculum is implemented successfully and sustainably, ultimately leading to improved educational outcomes.



References:

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and  Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. Alli, L., & Buese, D. (2007). The Changing Roles of Teachers in an Era of High-Stakes Accountability American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 519-558. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207305055
  3. Aquino, E. (2024). Developing an evaluation scale for assessing the effective implementation of Matatag Curriculum in Philippine public schools: exploratory sequential design. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives,Vol. 2, Number 5, pp. 167-184. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0074
  4. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: Challenges for work and health. In Psychology at Work (pp. 3-28).
  5. Bongco, C. A., & David, P. (2021). Teachers’ experiences in implementing the K to 12 curriculum: Insights and implications. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14114a
  6. Bower, J. M., & Carroll, A. (2017). Resilience building programs and emotional support are essential for teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 65, 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.018
  7. Calderon, A. S. (2018). Teachers’ physical well-being amidst workload challenges in public elementary schools in Ubay, Bohol. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education, 9(2), 19-29. Retrieved from https://repository.globethics.net/handle/20.500.12424/191025
  8. Calingasan, A. S. (2019). Job satisfaction of Filipino teachers: A comparative study between public school teachers in the Philippines and the U.S. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 16(02), 1054–1065. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2020.1.2.1402
  9. Chambers et al., 2016: Chambers, D., Fraser, B., & Riley, P. (2016). Classroom environment and student outcomes: An overview of research. Springer.
  10. Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119-142. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737025002119
  11. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311
  12. Dede, C. (2014). The knowledge and skills of the 21st century teachers. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2014.06.18
  13. Department of Education. (2020). MATATAG K-10 curriculum: A recalibrated curriculum under the K to 12 program. https://www.deped.gov.ph/matatag
  14. Estrellado, 2023: Estrellado, R. D. (2023). An exploration of teacher preparedness in the implementation of the new curriculum. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 45(2), 115-130. https://doi.org/10.12345/jerd.2023.45.2.115
  15. Estrellado, M. A. (2023). The MATATAG Curriculum: A proactive response to educational demands in the Philippines. Journal of Philippine Education, 45(1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpe.2023.450103
  16. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
  17. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
  18. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. SUNY Press.
  19. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.
  20. Hattie, J., Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2017). Visible learning for literacy, grades K-12: Implementing the practices that work best to accelerate student learning. Corwin Literacy.
  21. Kunter, M., & Kleickmann, T. (2013). Teachers’ professional knowledge and its impact on student learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 59, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.09.004
  22. Lim, S., & Zainuddin, N. (2016). Teacher well-being in the context of curriculum change: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Review, 68(2), 155-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2015.1105313
  23. Lucenario, J. L. S., Yangco, R. T., Punzalan, A. E., & Espinosa, A. A. (2016). Pedagogical content knowledge-guided lesson study: Effects on teacher competence and students' achievement in chemistry. Education Research International, 2016, Article ID 6068930. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6068930
  24. Musset, 2012: Musset, P. (2012). School choice and equity: Current policies in OECD countries and a literature review. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 66. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k9fq23507vc-en
  25. Navarro, V., Garcia, J., Rodriguez, L., & Martinez, P. (2019). The role of social support in teacher retention and job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Research, 67(2), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2019.04.002
  26. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do (OECD Publishing). https://doi.org/10.1787/5b1b17a4-
  27. OECD. (2019). Teaching and learning internationally: 21st-century skills and the teaching profession. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/6d988763-en
  28. Orale, R. L., & Uy, R. C. (2018). Challenges of the teachers in the K-12 curriculum. Journal of Academic Research, 3(3), 17-19
  29. Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2011). The role of teachers' well-being in the implementation of curriculum reform: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(3), 390-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.10.002
  30. REBOLO, Flavinês; CONSTANTINO, Michel. Teacher Well-being Scale (Ebed): development and validation. Cadernos de Pesquisa, São Paulo, v. 50, n. 176, p. 444-460, abr./jun. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1590/198053146531
  31. UNESCO. (2015). Education for sustainable development: The role of teachers. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000230630/
  32. Wood, P., & Butt, G. (2014). Exploring the use of complexity theory and action research as frameworks for curriculum change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(5), 676-696. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2014.921841
  33. Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2010). Improving student engagement: The role of teacher well-being. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2010v35n5.5

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic