HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 47 no. 4 (2025)

Curriculum Mapping and Teacher Perspectives on the Vertical Articulation of Geometry in the Spiral Progression Approach

Sheena Taghap | Hermae Joyce Toraja

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The Spiral Progression Approach (SPA), introduced in the Philippine K-12 curriculum, aims to strengthen the continuity and coherence of learning by revisiting concepts at increasing levels of complexity across grade levels. In geometry, vertical articulation is crucial in ensuring that foundational ideas introduced in elementary grades are reinforced and expanded upon in high school, enabling learners to build upon their prior knowledge systematically. Despite its promise, questions remain regarding how effectively this articulation is realized in classroom practice. This study investigated how geometry instruction was articulated vertically across Grades 1 to 10 in the SPA. Specifically, it sought to determine (1) the extent to which the learning content of geometry demonstrates vertical articulation, and (2) the challenges teachers encounter in implementing the approach. A qualitative descriptive-evaluative research design was employed, involving eleven mathematics teachers—five from high school and six from elementary. Data were gathered using a researcher-developed interview questionnaire and analyzed through Provus's Discrepancy Evaluation Model (DEM), guided by Ahmad's (2011) six-step framework for program evaluation. Findings revealed that vertical articulation in geometry is evident in the curriculum but uneven in practice. Effective articulation fostered coherent and interconnected learning experiences that promoted mastery and progression of concepts. However, weak or incomplete articulation resulted in fragmented instruction that limited knowledge transfer across grade levels. Teachers reported persistent challenges such as content overlaps, gaps, and difficulties aligning instructional delivery. The study concludes that strengthening curriculum alignment and providing teacher support are essential for maximizing the effectiveness of the SPA in geometry, ultimately leading to smoother learning progressions and more consistent student outcomes.



References:

  1. Acquah, B. Y. S., & Owusu, A. A. (2021). Vertical articulation and content relevance of the senior High school economics curriculum: Case of Ghana. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 7(3), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2021.73.169.178
  2. Ahmad, J. (2011, October 25). Provus discrepancy evaluation model (DEM) [ppt] https://www.slideshare.net
  3. Batidor, P. G., & Casinillo, L. F. (2021). Evaluating Spiral Progression Approach (SPA) in teaching science and mathematics for Junior high curriculum. Philippine Social Science Journal, 4(3), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.52006/main.v4i3.362
  4. Bulkani, B., Setiawan, M. A., & Wahidah, W. (2022). The discrepancy evaluation model in the implementation of online learning (on the basis of parents' perceptions). The Education and Science Journal, 24(2), 116–137.https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2022-2-116-137
  5. Department of Education (DepEd). (2016). Philippine K to 10 Mathematics Curriculum Guide. http://lrmds.deped.gov.ph
  6. Dio, R. V. (2020). Exploring Vertical coherence of content topics in Philippine Spiral KTO10 Mathematics Curriculum. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 19(11), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.11.15
  7. Garcia, R. E. (2021). Factors that influence students' learning progress in the Science Spiral Progression curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.2020.5
  8. Hall, S., & Liebenberg, L. (2024). Qualitative Description as an Introductory Method to Qualitative Research for Master's-Level Students and Research Trainees. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241242264  
  9. Kurt, S. (2021). Constructivist Learning Theory. https://educationaltechnology.net/constructivist-learning-theory
  10. Lazaro, C. (2023). TEACHERS AND STUDENTS' LIVED EXPERIENCES IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SPIRAL PROGRESSION APPROACH IN MATHEMATICS. International Journal of Arts, Sciences and Education, 4(3), 90–107. Retrieved from https://www.mail.ijase.org/index.php/ijase/article/view/291
  11. Li, Z., & Harfitt, G. J. (2016). An examination of language teachers' enactment of curriculum materials in the context of a centralised curriculum. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 25(3), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2016.1270987
  12. Pacala, F. a. A. (2022). DISCIPLINE-BASED VS. SPIRAL LEARNING APPROACH TO SCIENCE EDUCATION: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS IN THE PHILIPPINE SETTING. IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching), 7(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet.v7i1.5598
  13. Stark, J. (2020). Dewey's Theory of Experience: A Theoretical Tool for Researching Music Teacher Learning. University of Manitoba, Canada
  14. Steinmetz, A. (1983). The discrepancy evaluation model. In Springer eBooks (pp. 79–99). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6669-7_5
  15. Supriyadi, N., Sholihin, N., & Lia, R. M. (2022). Developing a Discrepancy Evaluation Model (DEM) to optimize PEP Unnes online workshop series. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211125.024
  16. The Official Gazzete (2013). Republic Act No. 10533. Retrieved from https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2013/05/15/republic-act-no-10533/
  17. Villamin, P., Lopez, V., Thapa, D. K., & Cleary, M. (2024). A worked example of qualitative descriptive design: A Step‐by‐Step guide for novice and early career researchers. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16481