Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 47 no. 7 (2025)

Effectiveness of CENRO Management in Implementing the National Greening Program in Bukidnon: A Socio-Environmental Evaluation

Jovelyn Oliverio | Larry Labay

Discipline: ecology and environmental biology

 

Abstract:

This study evaluated the effectiveness of Community Environment and Natural Resources Offices (CENROs) in implementing the National Greening Program (NGP) in Bukidnon and assessed its socio-economic and socio-cultural impacts on beneficiaries. Anchored on the Ecosystem Services Theory and the Livelihood Resilience Framework, the study employed a descriptive-evaluative design, utilizing a structured questionnaire administered to 100 respondents—comprising 50 CENRO personnel and 50 NGP beneficiaries. The study focused on four core variables: social engagement and People's Organization (PO) empowerment, environmental conservation and protection, socio-economic benefits, and socio-cultural impacts. Descriptive statistics showed that the implementation of the NGP by CENROs was perceived as very highly effective in the areas of social engagement (?? = 4.34), environmental conservation (?? = 4.36), and socio-economic outcomes (?? = 4.25). While the socio-cultural aspect received a lower but still highly effective rating (?? = 3.56), it indicated a need for stronger integration of indigenous rights and cultural preservation in NGP efforts. Inferential analysis using ANOVA revealed no significant difference in respondents' perceptions of program effectiveness when grouped by household size, educational attainment, and source of income, leading to the non-rejection of the null hypothesis. These findings suggest that CENROs have demonstrated commendable performance in implementing the NGP, contributing to reforestation goals, community empowerment, and local economic development. The consistency of perceptions across diverse demographic groups underscores the inclusive nature of the program's reach. However, the study recommends enhanced efforts in conflict resolution, market linkage, and deeper cultural engagement to further improve implementation. Insights from this research may inform future environmental policy and community-based forest management strategies in the Philippines.



References:

  1. Abella, R. C., & Cutamora, J. C. (2019). An Evaluation of the National Greening Program Implementation in Simala, Cebu Philippines Utilizing ABCD Model. European Scientific Journal, 15(10), 168–183. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2019.v15n10p168
  2. Accion, K. E. B. (2023). Community Participation Framework in the Philippine Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) System. International Journal of Progressive Research in Engineering Management and Science, 3(5), 1044–1051. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377221654
  3. Adriano, M. B. D. C., & Galang, M. A. (2015). Use of soil information in the National Greening Program of DENR Region IV-A, Philippines. Ecosystem & Development Journal, 5(2), 35–40. Retrieved from https://www.ukdr.uplb.edu.ph/journal-articles/5271/
  4. Aldon, E., Forbes, A., & Ang, N. (2016). Socio-cultural factors influencing adaptation capacity of indigenous people in Barotac Viejo, West Central Philippines. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 45–54. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2016.41006
  5. Bueno Vista, A. (2018). Impact Assessment of the National Greening Program of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources: Scoping or Process Evaluation Phase Economic Component. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328759909
  6. Castillo, J. S., & Nozaleda, B. M. (2022). Environmental Education of Students Pursuing Higher Education: Probing on Climate Change Awareness. Journal of Climate Change, 8(3), 41–49. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3233/JCC220020
  7. Catacutan, D., Neely, C., & Johnson, M. (2017). Landcare in the Philippines: A review of 20 years of experience. World Agroforestry Centre.
  8. Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Braat, L., Kubiszewski, I., Fioramonti, L., Sutton, P., ... & Grasso, M. (2017). Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosystem Services, 28, 1–16. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
  9. Cutillas, A. L. (2021). Role of Women in the Implementation of the National Greening Program (NGP) in Cebu Province. ResearchGate. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352210555
  10. De Zoysa, M. (2016). Socio-economic and environmental impacts of teak monoculture plantations in Sri Lanka. In Sustainable Forestry in South Asia (pp. 123-145). Springer. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309726237
  11. Eslit, E. R. (2023). Empowering Change at the Grassroots: Community-Led Initiatives for Local Environmental Protection. St. Michael's College, Iligan City, Philippines. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372420900
  12. Goltiano, H. M., Gregorio, N. O., Pasa, A. E., & Herbohn, J. L. (2021). The effect of the implementation of the National Greening Program on the socio-economic status of smallholders in Caibiran, Biliran, Philippines. Small-scale Forestry, 20(1), 1–17. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-021-09482-9
  13. GSPAJournal. (2024). Empowering Grassroots Voices: Engagement of Civil Society Organizations in Philippine Local Governance. Public Administration Journal, 8, 1–15. Retrieved from https://pa.gspajournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/8.Empowering-Grassroots-Voices-Engagement-of-Civil-Society-Organizations-in-Philippine-Local-Governance-1.pdf
  14. Hoffmann, R., & Muttarak, R. (2020). Greening through schooling: Understanding the link between education and pro-environmental behavior in the Philippines. Environmental Research Letters, 15(1), 014009. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab5ea0
  15. Le, H. D., Smith, C., Herbohn, J., & Harrison, S. (2014). What drives the success of reforestation projects in tropical developing countries? The case of the Philippines. Environmental Modelling & Software, 62, 62-77. Retrieved from https://rainforestation.ph/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Le_et_al_2013.pdf
  16. Maharjan, K. L., Gonzalvo, C. M., & Baggo, J. C. (2025). Balancing Tradition and Innovation: The Role of Environmental Conservation Agriculture in the Sustainability of the Ifugao Rice Terraces. Agriculture, 15(3), 246. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15030246
  17. Mallari, N. A. D., Collar, N. J., McGowan, P. J. K., & Marsden, S. J. (2016). Philippine protected areas are not meeting the biodiversity coverage and management effectiveness requirements of Aichi Target 11. PLoS ONE, 11(8), e0160557. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160557
  18. Meneses, A. B. (2019). Kahampatan: Ayta's concept of development in the context of Indigenous People's (IP) culture and identity. Philippine Journal of Social Development, 12, 5–20. Retrieved from https://cswcd.upd.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/PJSD-12
  19. Nguyen, T. T., Do, T. H., & Tran, Q. T. (2022). The societal and economic impact of reforestation strategies and policies in Southeast Asia: A review. Forests, 13(1), 1. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/f14010001
  20. Oliveros, E. D. (2022). Evaluation of the Implementation of National Greening Program Among Indigenous People's Participation in Region 12. Global Scientific Journal, 10(8), 1593–1612. Retrieved from https://www.globalscientificjournal.com/researchpaper/EVALUATION_OF_THE_IMPLEMENTATION_OF_NATIONAL_GREENING_PROGRAM_AMONG_INDIGENOUS_PEOPLE_S_PARTICIPATION_IN_REGION_12.pdf
  21. Philippine Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (PBSAP) 2015–2028. (n.d.). Convention on Biological Diversity. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/doc/world/ph/ph-nbsap-v3-en.pdf
  22. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. (2016). Impact Assessment of the National Greening Program of the DENR: Scoping or Process Evaluation Phase. PIDS Discussion Paper Series No. 2016-29. Retrieved from https://pidswebs.pids.gov.ph/CDN/PUBLICATIONS/pidsdps1629.pdf
  23. Pulhin, J. M., Inoue, M., & Enters, T. (2023). Three Decades of Community-Based Forest Management in the Philippines: Emerging Lessons for Sustainable and Equitable Forest Management. International Forestry Review, 25(1), 1-15. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1505/ifor.9.4.865
  24. Pulhin, J. M., Ramirez, M. A. M., Garcia, J. E., & Pangilinan, M. J. Q. (2024). Contextualizing sustainable forest management and social justice in community-based forest management (CBFM) program in the Philippines. Trees, Forests and People, 16, 100589. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100589
  25. Sandhu, R. (2021). Environmental Governance in the Philippines. National College of Public Administration and Governance. https://ncpag.upd.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/SANDHU_Environmental-Governance_09242021.pdf
  26. Tanner, T., Bahadur, A., & Moench, M. (2015). Challenges for resilience policy and practice. Overseas Development Institute. Retrieved from https://cdn.odi.org/media/documents/10352.pdf
  27. Tungpalan, M. (2015). Community Development Research: Philippine Journal of Social Development. Philippine Journal of Social Development, 7, 74–94. Retrieved from https://cswcd.upd.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/PJSD-Vol-7-2015_Tungpalan.pdf
  28. UNESCO. (2015). Rice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Retrieved from https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/722/
  29. Vista, A. B., Briones, N. D., Predo, C. D., & Bantayan, N. C. (2016). Impact assessment of the National Greening Program of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources: Scoping or process evaluation phase – Economic component (PIDS Discussion Paper Series No. 2016-27). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/173548/1/pidsdps1627.pdf.
  30. Wikipedia. (2023). Community-based Forest management in the Philippines. Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_based_forest_management_in_the_Philippines

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic