Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 47 no. 7 (2025)

The Implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum Framework and Learner Engagement

Ellaisha Anselmo | Dennis A. Negosa

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study examines the level of implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum and its impact on the level of learner engagement among elementary students in the Division of Malaybalay City, District X. The MATATAG Curriculum was introduced to address challenges in learner participation and academic outcomes by emphasizing capacity-building initiatives, improved access to teaching and learning resources, and curricular adjustments. Conducted from November 2024 to March 2025, the study employed a descriptive-correlational research design to determine the level of curriculum implementation and its relationship with learner engagement across behavioral, cognitive, and emotional dimensions. Respondents included 40 elementary teachers from kindergarten, grade one, and grade four in the district's public schools, who were pioneers in the said curriculum. Data were gathered through validated survey instruments and analyzed using Pearson's r correlation. Findings revealed a very high level of MATATAG Curriculum implementation, particularly in areas such as institutional support, teacher professional development, and the availability of instructional materials. However, the limited supply of textbooks was noted as a recurring challenge. Learner engagement was also rated very high, particularly in terms of classroom participation, problem-solving, and critical thinking skills. A significant positive correlation of .730 at a p-value of .000 was identified between curriculum implementation and learner engagement. This implies that successful implementation leads to improved educational outcomes and increased student involvement. The study concludes that maintaining high levels of learner engagement requires constant curriculum improvement, adequate resource allocation, and teacher training. Additionally, it suggests conducting further longitudinal research to assess the long-term effects of the MATATAG Curriculum on academic performance. These findings offer valuable insights for educators and legislators seeking to create more adaptable, participatory, and learner-centered learning environments.



References:

  1. Abalde, R. A., & Oco, N. P. (2023). Continuous monitoring practices in curriculum implementation. Manila: Education Research Press.
  2. Acosta, A. S., & Acosta, M. D. (2017). Challenges in implementing the K-12 curriculum in public schools. Philippine Journal of Education, 94(2), 45–60.
  3. Albert, J. R., Santos, A. L., & David, C. C. (2023). Evaluating education reform: Frameworks and field realities. Quezon City: Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
  4. Al-Hattami, A. A. (2019). Effects of positive youth development programs on students' well-being and academic achievement. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 24(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2018.1528166
  5. Brown, G. T. L., Irwin, K. C., & Peterson, E. R. (2012). Curriculum alignment: Three heads are better than one. Curriculum Matters, 8, 97–118.
  6. Cabansag, J. N. (2014). Impact statements on the K–12 science program in the enhanced basic education curriculum in provincial schools. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(6), 421–436.
  7. Cadima, J., Simões, C., & Leal, T. (2020). Quality in early childhood education: The role of process features in children's outcomes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 52, 425–436.
  8. Department of Education (DepEd). (2013). Implementing rules and regulations of the Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013 (RA 10533). Pasig City: DepEd.
  9. Department of Education (DepEd). (2023). MATATAG Curriculum Framework and implementation guidelines. Pasig City: Bureau of Curriculum Development.
  10. Ednave, L. J., Montemayor, J. E., & Soriano, K. L. (2018). Assessing the effectiveness of K-12 implementation: A local case study. Philippine Education Studies Journal, 4(1), 36–52.
  11. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
  12. Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2019). Learner engagement in blended learning environments: A conceptual framework. Online Learning Journal, 23(2), 145–178.
  13. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
  14. Javier, R. B. (2023). Empowering educators through continuous professional development. Manila: Learning and Teaching Innovations Press.
  15. Kilag, J. M., De la Cruz, L. T., & Samonte, P. G. (2024). Evaluating the MATATAG Curriculum: Implementation insights and early impacts. Philippine Educational Research Journal, 12(1), 1–25.
  16. Liu, Y., Wang, Z., & Chen, H. (2024). Emotional engagement and well-being of elementary learners: Implications for curriculum design. Asia-Pacific Journal of Education, 44(2), 98–115.
  17. Maguate, D. L. (2024). Stakeholder involvement in Philippine curriculum reforms: A community-based approach. Journal of Educational Development, 8(1), 88–102.
  18. Moreno, R. (2004). Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instructional Science, 32(1–2), 99–113.
  19. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. Boston College: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
  20. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  21. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2020). Quality early childhood education and care for children under age 3: Results from the Starting Strong Survey 2018. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  22. Pangilinan, R. A. P. (2024). The MATATAG Curriculum: Empowering Success for Teachers and Students. Retrieved from https://www.depedbataan.com
  23. Panhoon, K., & Wongwanich, S. (2014). Characteristics of effective feedback for enhancing learning outcomes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4303–4308.
  24. Philippine News Agency. (2023). DepEd rolls out MATATAG curriculum in pilot schools. Retrieved from https://www.pna.gov.ph
  25. Retnawati, H., Hadi, S., & Nugraha, A. (2016). Vocational high school teachers' difficulties in implementing the assessment in curriculum 2013 in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 9(1), 33–48.
  26. Saracho, O. N. (2021). Developmental theories and their influence on early childhood education and care. Early Child Development and Care, 191(4), 553–566.
  27. Schunk, D. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2012). Self-efficacy as an engaged learner. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 219–235). Springer.
  28. SEAMEO INNOTECH. (2012). K to 12 Toolkit: Resource guide for teacher education institutions and school administrators. Quezon City: SEAMEO INNOTECH.
  29. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.
  30. Tan, D. A., Reyes, W. S., & Batacan, T. R. (2018). 21st-century curriculum integration and responsiveness in Philippine basic education. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 10(1), 39–58.
  31. Tirol, R. (2022). Spiral progression in the K-12 curriculum: A strategic approach or cognitive overload? Philippine Journal of Curriculum Studies, 3(2), 77–89.
  32. Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from https://www.advance-he.ac.uk
  33. Uy, G. M., Manalo, J. D., & Ruiz, K. B. (2024). Learner engagement in the MATATAG curriculum: Early evidence from pilot implementations. Basic Education Research Journal, 5(1), 17–35.
  34. Villaver, M. T. (2024). MATATAG Curriculum Rollout: Understanding Challenges for Effective Implementation. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11183036
  35. Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. L. (2014). Motivational pathways to school success: A review of research on engagement and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 1–19.
  36. Yang, C., Shin, Y., & Wang, S. (2023). Effects of parental involvement on academic achievement and student engagement. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 101951.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic