HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 27 no. 2 (2024)

Factors in Using Mobile-Assisted Language Learning Tools and Their Relation to Students’ Behavioral Intention

Gerwin Sagun

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study, grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), aimed to explore the factors influencing the utilization of Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL) among Grade 7 modular distance learners at Sto. Domingo National Trade School in the Philippines. The collected data yielded positive responses in terms of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and attitudes towards MALL, underscoring its positive impact on modular distance learning. Learners expressed a favorable perception of MALL's value and convenience, fostering a conducive environment for integrating it into English instruction in remote learning. The study found that students exhibited a willingness to adopt MALL tools for habitual, future, and interactional use. This indicates their positive disposition towards incorporating MALL into their learning routines, suggesting its potential for enhancing English language skills and facilitating interaction among students. However, it's noteworthy that the study did not establish significant relationships between the TAM components and students' behavioral intentions, challenging the applicability of the TAM model in this context. These results suggest that students, who are digital natives accustomed to mobile technology, may consider other factors beyond perceived usefulness and ease of use when determining their intentions. Limitations include a relatively small and homogenous sample of digitally native learners, limiting the generalizability of the findings. Future research could explore the influence of additional external variables on behavioral intentions and involve a more diverse participant pool. Moreover, the study recommends revising the TAM model to account for evolving user demands and examining contemporary mobile learning infrastructures. In light of these findings, practical recommendations include providing relevant and up-to-date mobile learning content, offering tutorials for new users, investing in ICT development, and carefully selecting MALL tools aligned with curriculum objectives. It is also crucial to consider MALL as a supplementary support rather than a replacement for traditional teaching methods.



References:

  1. Ali, M. M., Mahmood, M. A., Yasmin, T., & Gulzar, M. A. (2021). Exploring the efficacy of Zoom as MALL tool in Pakistan. Elementary Education Online, 20(5), 6058-6071
  2. Ali, M. M., Mahmood, M. A., Anjum, M. A. I., & Shahid, A. (2020). The acceptance of mobile assisted language learning as primary learning tool for learners in COVID 19 situations. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(12), 382-398.
  3. Ali, M. M., Mahmood, M. A., Anwar, M. N., Khan, L. A., & Hussain, A. (2019). Pakistani learners’ perceptions regarding mobile assisted language learning in ESL classroom. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(4), 386-398.
  4. Anggraeni, A. C. (2022). Students’ perceptions of using zoom as Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL) in speaking classrooms: A case study on the English education students of UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung).
  5. Azar, A. S., & Tan, N. H. I. (2020). The application of ICT techs (mobile-assisted language learning, gamification, and virtual reality) in teaching English for secondary school students in Malaysia during covid-19 pandemic. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11C), 55-63.
  6. Azli, W. U. A. W., Shah, P. M., & Mohamad, M. (2018). Perception on the usage of mobile assisted language learning (MALL) in English as a second language (ESL) learning among vocational college students. Creative Education, 9(01), 84.
  7. Charness N., B. W. (2016). Handbook of the Psychology of Aging (Eight ed.). Academic Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-411469-2.00020-0
  8. Ghani, M. T. A., Hamzah, M., Ramli, S., Ab, W., Daud, A. W., Romli, T. R. M., & Mokhtar, N. N. M. (2019). A questionnaire-based approach on technology acceptance model for mobile digital game-based learning. Journal of Global Business and Social Entrepreneurship (GBSE), 5(14), 11-21.
  9. Grant, M. M. (2019). Difficulties in defining mobile learning: Analysis, design characteristics, and implications. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(2), 361-388.
  10. Habib S, Haider A, Suleman SSM, Akmal S, Khan MA. (2022). Mobile Assisted Language Learning: Evaluation of Accessibility, Adoption, and Perceived Outcome among Students of Higher Education. Electronics, 11(7):1113. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11071113
  11. Haron, H., Al Abri, A., & Alotaibi, N. (2021). The Use of WhatsApp in Teaching and Learning English during COVID-19: Students' Perception and Acceptance. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 15(3), 1014-1033.
  12. Hidayati, T., & Husna, F. (2020). Learning English from Home during the COVID-19: Investigating Learners’ Experience for Online and Autonomous Learning. Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English, 6(2), 202-217.
  13. Kang, T. (2021). The Effect of Using Technology in L2 Listening: A Meta-Analysis of Studies From 1980 to 2020. In Design Solutions for Adaptive Hypermedia Listening Software (pp. 1-30). IGI Global.
  14. Katemba, C. (2021). Enhancing vocabulary performance through mobile assisted language learning at a rural school in Indonesia. Enhancing Vocabulary Performance Through Mobile Assisted Language Learning at a Rural School in Indonesia, 6(1).
  15. Kim, G. M., & Lee, S. J. (2016). Korean students' intentions to use mobile-assisted language learning: Applying the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Contents, 12(3), 47-53.
  16. Krull, G., & Duart, J. M. (2017). Research trends in mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review of articles (2011–2015). International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(7).
  17. Kumar, B. A., & Mohite, P. (2018). Usability of mobile learning applications: a systematic literature review. Journal of Computers in Education, 5(1), 1-17.
  18. Lappe, J. M. (2000). Taking the mystery out of research: Descriptive correlational design. Orthopaedic Nursing, 19(2), 81.
  19. Lin, Z., Abdullah, A. N., & Samad, A. (2020) A. Exploring Chinese EFL Teachers’ Acceptance of Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL).
  20. Maarouf, S. (2022). Students' Attitudes Towards Using Smart phones in English Language Learning During the Spread of COVID-19. A Field Study in the Secondary Schools in Lattakia Governorate. Association of Arab Universities Journal for Education and Psychology, 19(4), 7.
  21. Madrigal, H. B. (2022). Social media platforms (SMPS) as supplemental learning opportunities in English. Docens Series in Education, 2, 18-35.
  22. Miller, J., & Khera, O. (2010). Digital library adoption and the technology acceptance model: A cross‐country analysis. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 40(1), 1-19.
  23. Mulyono, H., Suryoputro, G., & Jamil, S. R. (2021). The application of WhatsApp to support online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(8), e07853.
  24. Mussa, I. H. (2020). Mobile Learning adoption in the Middle East: Limitations, Challenges and Features of the Mobile Devices. Int. J. Contemp. Manag. Inf. Technol, 1(1), 30-36.
  25. Mutiaraningrum, I., & Nugroho, A. (2021). Smartphone-based mobile assisted language learning application in higher vocational education in Indonesia. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 6(1).
  26. Naeini.H. & BalaKrishnam,. (2012). Usage Pattern, Perceived Usefulness and Ease of Use of Computer Games among Malaysian Elementary School Students. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology. 4. 5285-5297.
  27. Nihayati, A., & Indriani, L. (2021). EFL Students’perspective on Whatsapp as Media of Online Teaching and Learning in Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Research on Language Education, 2(1), 44-52.
  28. Nuraeni, C. (2021). Maximizing mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) amid Covid-19 pandemic: Teachers’ perception. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 5(1), 11-18.
  29. Qazi, A., Qazi, J., Naseer, K., Zeeshan, M., Qazi, S., Abayomi-Alli, O., ... & Haruna, K. (2021). Adaption of distance learning to continue the academic year amid COVID-19 lockdown. Children and Youth Services Review, 126, 106038.
  30. Sari, N., & Sulistyo, T. (2022). EFL Teachers’ perspectives on mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) resources for vocational high school students. Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 5(1), 80-90.
  31. Siedlecki, S. (2020). Understanding Descriptive Research Designs and Methods, Clinical Nurse Specialist: 1/2 2020 - Volume 34 - Issue 1 - p 8-12 doi: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000493
  32. Soleimani, E., Ismail, K., & Mustaffa, R. (2014). The acceptance of mobile assisted language learning (MALL) among post graduate ESL students in UKM. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 457-462.
  33. Sutrisna, I. P. E., Lagatama, P., & Dane, N. (2020). The Efficacy of Mall Instruction In Tourism English Learning During Covid-19 Pandemic. CULTOURE: Culture Tourism and Religion, 1(2), 122-135.
  34. Toyokawa, Y., Chen, A. M. R., Majumdar, R., Hwang, G. J., & Ogata, H. (2020). Trends of E-Book-Based English Language Learning: A Review of Journal Publications from 2010 to 2019. In 28th International Conference on Computers in Education Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. 484-493). Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education (APSCE).
  35. Turc, L. 2017. Mobile-assisted language learning (MALL). Romanian Association   of   Teacher   of   English Issues. https://rate.org.ro/blog2.php/1/mobile-assisted-language-learning-mall
  36. Wiranegara, D. A., & Hairi, S. (2020). Conducting English learning activities by implementing Telegram group class during COVID-19 pandemic. JEASP (Journal of English for Academic and Specific Purposes, 3(2), 104-114.