HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 27 no. 7 (2024)

Principals’ Leadership on Technology Integration and its Effect to School Performance: Basis for Training Development Program

Princess Pacon | Melchor Espiritu

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to determine the principals’ leadership on technology integration and its effect on school performance, which served as the basis for training development program during the school year 2023-2024. The perception of the respondents on the leadership of school principals on technology integration. With respect to the Respondents’ Perceptions on the Leadership of Principals on Technology Integration, the administrator-respondents obtained a grand weighted mean of 3.60, while the teacher-respondents obtained 3.50, which were both verbally interpreted as Strongly Agree. Significant difference between the perceptions of the two groups of respondents on the principals’ leadership on technology integration. There is no significant difference between the perceptions of the two groups of respondents except for technological competence, innovativeness, and effect on teachers’ performance. The performance ratings of the schools during the school year 2022-2023. The performance ratings of the schools during the school year 2022-2023 are 4.36, 4.48, 4.39, 4.42, and 4.39, respectively, and they were given an adjectival rating of Very Satisfactory. Significant correlation between the principals’ leadership on technology integration and the school performance. There is a very low significant correlation between the principals’ leadership on technology integration and school performance.



References:

  1. Bauer, J. & Kenton, J. (2019). Toward technology integration in the schools: Why it isn't happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4).
  2. Brockmeier, L., Sermon, J., & Hope, W. (2020). Principals' relationship with computer technology. NASSP Bulletin, 89(643), 45-63.
  3. Cery, K. (2020). Principal leadership for technology integration: A study of principal technology leadership. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Drexel University, the United States. Retrieved June 6, from http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Research/NECC_Research_ Paper_ Archives/NE CC_  /Kozlowski_ Kristen_ N07.
  4. Daniel, P. T. K., & Nance, J. P. (2020). The role of the administrator in instructional technology policy. B.Y.U. Education and Law Journal, 211- 231.
  5. Dawson, C., & Rakes, G. (2019). The influence of principals' technology training on the integration of technology into schools. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 29-49
  6. Ertmer, P., & Bai, H. (2019). Technology leadership: Shaping administrators' knowledge and skills through an online professional development course. In D. Willis et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for information Technology & Teacher Education international Conference (pp. 482-486). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  7. Fadel, C., & Lemke, C. (2019). Technology in schools: What the research says. Retrieved from http://www.cisco.com/web/strategy/docs/education/ Technology in Schools Report pdf.
  8. Finn, R. W. (2020). An investigation of the needs of school principals for successful integration of technology in high schools (Unpublished dissertation). Dowling College: New York.
  9. Fullan, M. (2019). The New Meaning of Educational Change, New York: Teacher’s College Press.
  10. Gahala, J. (2021). Critical issues: Promoting technology use in schools. Naperville, ILL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
  11. Gusby, T. (2020). Closing achievement gaps: Revisiting Benjamin S. Bloom’s “Learning for Mastery.” Education Week, 2(35), 14-27.
  12. Jonah, G. (2019). Instructional technology leadership ability of the school principal and effective use of technology in the classroom. Doctoral dissertation, Argosy University, Nashville, TN.
  13. Keithwood, K., Louis, K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2019). Learningfrom leadership: A review of the literature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement
  14. Leonard, L., & Leonard, P. (2019). Leadership for technology integration: Computing the reality. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 52(4), 212-224.
  15. Mishra, P. & Koehler, M.J. (2019). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), p. 1017-1020.
  16. Nolen, A. J. (2021). The content of educational psychology: An analysis of top-ranked journals from 2003-2007. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 279-289.
  17. Northhouse, P.G. (2020). Leadership: Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA.
  18. Penuel, W. (2019). Implementation and effects of one-to-one computing initiatives: A research synthesis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 3(2), 5-25.
  19. Sivin-Kachala, J., & Bialo, E. R. (2020). Using information and communication technology. International Journal of Education and Development, 7(1), 68-85.
  20. Warschauer, M. (2019). New reports on technology in U.S. schools: The changing divide. Papyrus News: On Digital Learning and Literacy. Retrieved from http://papyrusnews.com/about-papyrus/.
  21. Wilmore, D., & Betz, M. (2018). Information technology and the schools: The principal's role. Educational Technology & Society, 3(4), 12-19.