Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 48 no. 1 (2025)

A Comparative Study of Online Ads vs. Billboards and Tarpaulins in Selected Private Schools in Lipa, Malvar, Tanauan, and Sto. Tomas, Batangas

Orbel Canoy | Mary Desa Polido

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study examined the comparative effectiveness of online advertisements and traditional outdoor media (billboards and tarpaulins) in promoting private schools across four municipalities in Batangas Province: Lipa, Tanauan, Malvar, and Sto. Tomas. Using a convergent parallel mixed-methods design, the research gathered quantitative data from 66 respondents across 22 private schools (18 from Lipa, 12 from Malvar, 27 from Tanauan, and 9 from Sto. Tomas) through surveys, along with qualitative insights obtained via focus group discussions and key informant interviews. The investigation focused on six dimensions of advertising effectiveness: reach and engagement, lead generation and conversion, cost efficiency, audience targeting, brand recall, and adaptability. Quantitative findings revealed that online advertisements are more adaptable, cost-efficient, and effective in engaging younger audiences, particularly in Lipa and Tanauan, where internet connectivity is stronger. In contrast, traditional outdoor advertisements such as tarpaulins and billboards remain more trusted and credible in semi-urban areas like Malvar and Sto. Tomas, where internet penetration is less stable. Qualitative findings revealed that parents valued the credibility and tangibility of traditional advertisements, while students preferred the interactivity of online platforms. Both groups emphasized the advantages of a hybrid approach that integrates the strengths of both media. These findings support the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) and Media Richness Theory (MRT), showing that online media stimulate central processing among students while traditional media appeal to peripheral cues valued by parents. Moreover, the results align with local reports, which indicate that Batangas households continue to rely on printed and outdoor materials due to limitations in digital access (Batangas Provincial Planning and Development Office, 2023; Department of Information and Communications Technology [DICT], 2022). This study concludes that the most effective approach is a hybrid advertising strategy that integrates online and traditional media, thereby maximizing reach, credibility, and cost efficiency. It further proposes the Infrastructure-Mediated Advertising Model, which emphasizes that technological access, demographic needs, and cultural trust shape advertising effectiveness. This research provides both theoretical contributions and practical recommendations for school administrators, particularly in semi-urban contexts, where hybrid campaigns offer the most substantial potential for enrollment growth.



References:

  1. Abueg, J. (2022). Tarpaulin advertising effectiveness in Laguna and Batangas public schools. Philippine Journal of Communication Research, 14(2), 55–70.
  2. Armstrong, G., & Kotler, P. (2019). Marketing: An introduction (13th ed.). Pearson.
  3. Batangas Provincial Planning and Development Office. (2023). Batangas Provincial Development Report 2023. Batangas City: BPPDO.
  4. Bautista, M., & Lim, A. (2021). Parental trust in school advertisements: A CALABARZON study. Journal of Philippine Education and Marketing, 9(1), 88–104.
  5. Belch, G. E., & Belch, M. A. (2021). Advertising and promotion: An integrated marketing communications perspective (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  6. Berger, A. A. (2020). Media and communication research methods: An introduction to qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage Publications.
  7. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1984). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
  8. Chaffey, D. (2021). Digital marketing: Strategy, implementation and practice (8th ed.). Pearson.
  9. Charlesworth, A. (2020). Cost-effective advertising options for educational institutions. Journal of Marketing Strategies, 34(2), 45–60.
  10. Cruz, L. (2020). Jeepney and tricycle advertising as localized promotional tools. Philippine Journal of Rural Marketing, 7(3), 25–39.
  11. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
  12. Dela Cruz, J. P. (2021). The impact of digital advertising on consumer engagement in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Business and Economics, 12(1), 45–60.
  13. Dela Cruz, J. P., & Reyes, M. (2022). Social media campaigns and enrollment growth in Philippine private schools. Asian Journal of Educational Marketing, 4(1), 23–37.
  14. Dela Peña, A. (2022). Billboard advertising and school inquiry rates in Batangas. Philippine Education Marketing Review, 6(2), 77–92.
  15. Department of Education. (2021). Use of traditional and outdoor advertising for community announcements. DepEd Publications.
  16. Department of Information and Communications Technology. (2022). Regional connectivity status report: CALABARZON. DICT Region IV-A.
  17. Evans, N. J. (2020). The role of digital media in education advertising. International Journal of Educational Technology, 11(1), 22–34.
  18. Garcia, R., & Lim, J. (2020). The continued relevance of tarpaulins in rural school promotions. Philippine Journal of Marketing and Society, 11(2), 61–74.
  19. Garcia, R., & Lim, J. (2023). SMS-tagged billboards and their effectiveness among rural families. Philippine Communication and Media Journal, 8(1), 45–58.
  20. Gbadamosi, A. (2020). Building credibility through school advertising. Educational Marketing Journal, 15(3), 78–89.
  21. Gonzales, P. (2023). Alumni testimonials and trust in private school branding in Cebu. Journal of Educational Promotion, 12(1), 34–49.
  22. Henderson, P. W., Cote, J. A., Leong, S. M., & Tropp, L. R. (2018). Building strong brands in a modern marketing environment. Pearson.
  23. Kapoor, S. (2019). Long-term returns of billboard advertising. Marketing Insights, 22(4), 12–16.
  24. Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523.
  25. Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2018). Principles of marketing (17th ed.). Pearson.
  26. Lester, P. M. (2019). Visual communication: Images with messages. Wadsworth Publishing.
  27. Lewis, W. (1898). The stages of advertising effectiveness. Advertising Age, 10(2), 45–50.
  28. Lindstrom, M. (2019). Brandwashed: Tricks companies use to manipulate our minds and persuade us to buy. Crown Publishing Group.
  29. Pavlou, P. A. (2021). Multimedia content and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Digital Marketing, 27(1), 1–15.
  30. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205.
  31. Robles, M. (2023). Hybrid advertising and student enrollment decisions in CALABARZON schools. Philippine Journal of Business and Education, 15(1), 59–73.
  32. Santos, E. (2023). Digital recall rates in Metro Manila private schools. Asian Marketing Journal, 10(2), 84–97.
  33. Shimp, T. A., & Andrews, J. C. (2018). Advertising, promotion, and other aspects of integrated marketing communications (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  34. Smith, A., & Baker, L. (2020). Comparing traditional and online advertising effectiveness in higher education. Journal of Marketing Research in Education, 5(2), 101–115.
  35. Torres, M. (2021). Google Ads in international student recruitment. International Journal of Educational Marketing, 8(2), 42–57.
  36. Wells, W., Moriarty, S., & Burnett, R. (2018). Advertising: Principles and practice. Pearson.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic