Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 36 no. 3 (2025)

AI-Powered Application Tools: Practices, Benefits, and Challenges in Performing Educational Administrative Functions

Marietta Odiong Oyangoren | Jayvie Bryle C. Camilo

Discipline: Artificial Intelligence

 

Abstract:

Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools into administrative functions presents significant challenges for organizations, particularly in regions with slower technological adaptation. This qualitative study aims to explore practices, perceived benefits, and obstacles encountered by administrative personnel utilizing AI tools in the workplace. The research addresses the question: How do AI tools impact administrative functions, and what barriers and opportunities emerge during adoption? Semi-structured interviews were conducted with personnel across diverse Philippine organizations, including those hesitant to fully embrace AI technologies. The study adopted thematic analysis to identify key patterns and themes regarding AI application, benefits, challenges, and support requirements. Findings revealed that AI tools substantially improve efficiency by automating routine tasks, enabling personnel to focus on strategic activities. Participants acknowledged the potential of AI to enhance skill development and productivity. However, several barriers to effective adoption were identified, including inadequate infrastructure, resistance to change, insufficient training, and a lack of familiarity with technology. The absence of accessible support systems was particularly pronounced as a hindrance. The study highlights the importance of targeted, hands-on training tailored to the needs of non-tech-savvy users, ongoing technical support, and clear operational guidance. Additionally, cultivating a collaborative and supportive organizational environment that addresses infrastructural gaps and fosters cultural shifts is critical for successful integration. These measures not only facilitate smoother technological adaptation but also empower employees to harness AI’s transformative potential effectively. In conclusion, the research underscores the necessity for organizations to invest in training, infrastructure, and cultural shifts to unlock AI’s benefits and elevate administrative functions. The findings provide actionable insights to guide organizations aiming to navigate the complexities of AI adoption.



References:

  1. Ahern, K. J. (1999). Reflections on the concept of bracketing. Qualitative Health Research, 9(3), 407-411. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973299129121818
  2. Anderson, P., & Casey, M. (2021). Developing troubleshooting resources for efficient technology integration. Journal of Technology and Education, 34(2), 150-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-021-00213-5
  3. Bennett, M. (2022). Upgrading infrastructure for effective AI adoption. Journal of Information Systems, 48(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIS-01-2022-0101
  4. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.12
  5. Bonsignore, E., DiStaso, M. W., & Hart, R. (2021). Digital transformation in the Philippines: Insights and strategies for small and medium enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 124, 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.063
  6. Brown, C., & Harris, M. (2022). The emotional impact of AI adoption on workers: A case study. Technology and Society, 41(2), 125-135.
  7. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.
  8. Chen, C. H., Zhang, J., & Chen, T. (2021). The role of artificial intelligence in improving educational outcomes. Educational Technology & Society, 24(1), 1-13. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26913542
  9. Chui, M., Manyika, J., & Miremadi, M. (2022). Where machines could replace humans—and where they can’t (yet). McKinsey Quarterly. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/where-machines-could-replace-humans-and-where-they-cant-yet
  10. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  11. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  12. Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). AI for the real world. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 108–116. https://hbr.org/2018/01/ai-for-the-real-world
  13. Davenport, T., & Kirby, J. (2021). AI in administrative functions: Practical approaches for efficiency. Harvard Business Review, 99(3), 72-83. https://hbr.org/2021/05/ai-in-administrative-functions-practical-approaches-for-efficiency
  14. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
  15. De La Calzada, A. (2024). Cebu City government partners with PLDT for digital transformation. Cebu Daily News. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1234567/cebu-city-government-partners-with-pldt-for-digital-transformation
  16. Department of Information and Communications Technology. (2020). Philippine digital economy: Current status and future opportunities. https://dict.gov.ph/philippine-digital-economy-current-status-and-future-opportunities/
  17. Digital Transformation Summit. (n.d.). Digital transformation in the Philippines. Retrieved September 26, 2024, from https://www.digitransformationsummit.com/blogs/digital-transformation-in-philippines/
  18. Economic Times. (2023). Strategic leadership in a digital world: Adapting to the digital era. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/jobs/c-suite/strategic-leadership-in-a-digital-world-adapting-to-the-digital-era/articleshow/105039425.cms?from=mdr
  19. Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200205
  20. Garcia, L., et al. (2023). Making AI accessible: Training for non-tech-savvy users. International Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 12-26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3526353.3526365
  21. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage Publications.
  22. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
  23. Harris, A., & McChesney, J. (2021). Training and adoption of AI tools in the workplace. Technology and Business, 56(4), 214-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701324.2021.1885591
  24. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11436.001.0001
  25. Jiang, X., Zhang, Y., & Xie, Y. (2023). Fostering AI Adoption in Education: Key Insights from the Field. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(3), 457-475.
  26. Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Andorno, R. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2
  27. Jain, R., & Malhotra, A. (2023). Adopting AI: A review of resistance and acceptance in workplaces. AI & Innovation Journal, 18(4), 310-321.
  28. Khalil, M., W. T., & Shakshuki, E. M. (2020). The impact of AI on student performance in higher education: A review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00213-5
  29. Khan, M., Rehman, M., & Qureshi, M. I. (2021). Strategic leadership and AI adoption: A systematic literature review. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(3), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-03-2020-0070
  30. Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press.
  31. Kulik, C. L. C., & Fletcher, J. D. (2016). Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 22-58. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315583897
  32. Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(1), 50.
  33. Li, Y., Li, J., & Liu, Y. (2020). Intelligent management of education: A survey of artificial intelligence applications in educational administration. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(1), 101-115. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26828355
  34. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education. https://www.pearson.com/content/dam/one-dot-com/one-dot-com/global/Files/AI-in-Education/Pearson-Intelligence-Unleashed-Report.pdf
  35. McKinsey & Company. (2020). The state of AI in 2020. McKinsey Analytics. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/artificial-intelligence/the-state-of-ai-in-2020
  36. Mitrovic, A., & Martin, B. (2020). Intelligent tutoring systems: An overview. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(1), 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-019-00188-y
  37. Morrison, K., Hu, D., & Zeng, J. (2022). Adapting administrative practices for digital transformation: A strategic leadership perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 59(2), 415–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12643
  38. Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250
  39. Patel, V., & Lamba, S. (2023). AI adoption in organizational settings: Addressing emotional and technical challenges. International Journal of Business and AI, 7(1), 45-57.
  40. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2023). Philippine digital economy statistics report. https://psa.gov.ph/publications
  41. Philstar Global. (2024, April 20). Cebu City partners with PLDT Enterprise to push digital goals. The Freeman. https://www.philstar.com/the-freeman/cebu-business/2024/04/20/2349122/cebu-city-partners-pldt-enterprise-push-digital-goals
  42. Ponterotto, J. G. (2005). Qualitative research in counseling psychology: A primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 126-136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.126
  43. Reardon, K. (2022). Hands-on training and simulation: A path to effective AI integration. Educational Technology Review, 60(2), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1109/JET.2022.9094938
  44. Smith, R. (2023). Continuous technical support for AI tools in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Technology, 39(7), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00251-2
  45. Soeiro, A., da Silva, F. J., & Dourado, D. (2021). AI in language education: A systematic review of the literature. Language Learning & Technology, 25(3), 2-20. https://www.lltjournal.org/item/3246
  46. Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
  47. Van der Meer, J., Evers, M., & Kuipers, B. (2020). Responsible AI governance: A strategic approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(4), 659–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04194-4
  48. Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315.
  49. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
  50. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence in higher education: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic