HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 36 no. 4 (2025)

Internet Accessibility, Cyber Valuing, and Degree of Productivity of School Heads, Teachers, and Students

Lany De Guzman | Ludy Duran

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study assessed the levels of internet accessibility, and productivity among the respondents, including the school heads, teachers, and students. The findings reveal that internet accessibility varies based on the type of internet connection available, with fiber internet, mobile data, and wireless broadband being the most common. School heads need to integrate technology into school management to harness its benefits, while teachers have reliable internet access at both home and school but seldom use educational apps and Open Educational Resources (OER). Students are proficient in digital tools but rarely provide feedback or report internet issues. In terms of technology use and ethics, school heads are responsible for promoting appropriate technology use and cyber ethics, while teachers are tasked with teaching ethical online conduct to students. The productivity analysis shows that school heads and teachers achieved very satisfactory performance in various domains but faced delays in submitting internet-based requirements. For teachers, there is a strong relationship between internet accessibility and productivity, though it explains only 4% of their productivity. For students, there is a weak but statistically significant positive relationship.



References:

  1. Anderson, S. (2020). Social media approaches and techniques for your own community.
  2. Affum, M. Q. (2022). The effect of internet on students' studies: A review. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 6932. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/6932
  3. Akin-Adramola, A. O., & Ada, O. O. (2014). An analysis of the influence of social media sites on Nigerian undergraduates. International Policy Brief Series: Education & Science Journal, 6(1), 1–11.
  4. Barreiro, E. (2017). A study on the internet connectivity in the Philippines. ResearchGate.
  5. Babbie, E. (2013). The practice of social research (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  6. Bautista, J., & Panganiban, R. (2021). Digital divide in the Philippines: An analysis of internet penetration and usage patterns. Philippine Journal of Science, 150(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.12870/pjs-2021-v150n2a1
  7. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2018). K-12 education: Our work in U.S. education. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. https://www.gatesfoundation.org/our-work/programs/us-program/k-12-education
  8. Brown, K., & Edmonds, R. (2018). Navigating institutional review boards: A guide for educational researchers. Teachers College Press.
  9. Buckingham, D., & Sefton-Green, J. (2013). Learning, media, and technology, 38(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2012.709032
  10. Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers' adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 8(1), 136–155. https://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/include/getdoc.php?id=5201&article=1292&mode=pdf
  11. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (9th ed.). Routledge.
  12. Common Sense Education. (2021). The best educational apps for your child. Common Sense Media. https://www.commonsensemedia.org/lists/the-best-educational-apps
  13. Coren, M. J. (2016). One of the internet's inventors thinks it should still be capitalized. Quartz. Archived from the original on 27 September 2020. Retrieved 8 September 2020.
  14. Credé, M., & Kuncel, N. R. (2008). Study habits, skills, and attitudes: The third pillar supporting collegiate academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(6), 425–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00089.x
  15. Department of Education. (2009). DO 50, s. 2009 – Launching the DepEd Internet Connectivity Project and directing all public high schools to subscribe to internet connectivity services. Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2009/05/15/do-50-s-2009-launching-the-deped-internet-connectivity-project-and-directing-all-public-high-schools-to-subscribe-to-internet-connectivity-services/
  16. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development-        report
  17. Dela Cruz, M. L., & De Guzman, C. E. (2022). Challenges and opportunities in bridging the digital divide in the Philippines. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 21(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.28945/4775
  18. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics: And sex and drugs and rock ‘n’     roll (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
  19. Federal Communications Commission. (2021). E-Rate: Universal Service Program for Schools and Libraries. Federal Communications Commission.
  20. Google Cloud Platform. (2021). Google Cloud: Cloud computing services. Google Cloud.
  21. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Leadership for learning: Does collaborative leadership make a difference in school improvement? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(6), 654–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143210379060
  22. Hargittai, E., & Hsieh, Y. P. (2013). Digital inequality: Differences in young adults' use of the internet. Communication Research, 40(5), 602–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211416253
  23. Hernando-Malipot, M. (2019). DepEd discourages use of social media in classrooms; potential cyber threat cited. Manila Bulletin. https://mb.com.ph/2019/07/01/deped-discourages-use-of-social-media-in-classrooms-potential-cyber-threat-cited/
  24. International Telecommunication Union. (2021). Percentage of individuals using the Internet. International Telecommunication Union.
  25. International Telecommunication Union. (2021). The state of broadband 2021: People-centred approaches for universal broadband. International Telecommunication Union. https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-s/opb/pol/S-POL-BROADBAND.23-2021-PDF-E.pdf
  26. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., & Estrada, V. (2019). NMC horizon report: 2019       higher education edition. EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2019/1/nmc-horizon-report-2019-higher-education-edition
  27. Kozma, R. B. (2005). National policies that connect ICT-based education reform to economic and       social development. Human Technology, 1(2), 117–156. https://doi.org/10.17011/ht/urn.200534
  28. Lalap Jr., V. G. (2021). Students’ academic performance and their perception on the use of Google       applications in social studies. EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD), 6(7), 564–572. https://eprajournals.com/IJSR/article/5533/download
  29. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
  30. Lim, K. Y., & de la Peña, N. V. (2021). Improving internet connectivity in the Philippines: Opportunities and challenges. Telematics and Informatics, 42, 101247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101247
  31. Microsoft Corporation. (2021). Microsoft 2021 annual report. Microsoft Corporation.
  32. Ngoumandjoka, C. (2012). Internet and its application in education. Studocu.
  33. Oduro, H., & Boateng, W. (2021). Last mile connectivity challenges in sub-Saharan Africa. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 23(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2020.3016517
  34. Olum, R., Ochieng, D., & Nambiro, E. (2021). Internet access and its impact on academic performance of students in Uganda: A case study of Makerere University. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 17(1), 4–18. https://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/include/getdoc.php?id=6548&article=1713&mode=pdf
  35. Pascua, A. D. B. (2019). Prohibiting the use of social media in class projects (Division Memorandum No. 085). Schools Division of Iloilo City. https://www.depediloilocity.net/images/issuances/divisionmemorandum/2019/2019DM85.pdf
  36. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2015). P21 framework definitions. Partnership for 21st Century Learning. http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework
  37. Project Tomorrow. (2021). Digital learning during the pandemic: Emerging evidence of an early K-12 educator survey. Project Tomorrow.
  38. Shavelson, R. J., Phillips, D. C., & Towne, F. G. (1991). The role of correlational research in educational measurement. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(4), 10–16.
  39. Smith, J. K. (2018). The impact of technology on communication and collaboration in organizations. International Journal of Business Communication, 46(3), 312–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488417751886
  40. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
  41. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2008). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 52(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.01.002
  42. UNESCO & World Bank Group Education Response Monitoring System Team. (2020). Education response to COVID-19: A survey of ministries of education. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.15220/978-92-3-100394-4
  43. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2019). SDG 4 data digest 2019: Education and the sustainable development goals. UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
  44. Wang, Y., Li, Y., & Li, Q. (2017). The impact of digital literacy on learning outcomes in the context of educational digital transformation. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Science Education and Art Appreciation, 866, 49–54. https://doi.org/10.2991/isea-17.2017.11
  45. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2