HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 48 no. 4 (2025)

Interactive Learning Approach in Teaching Reading 3

Janice Venido

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study investigated the effectiveness of the interactive learning approach in teaching reading to Grade 3 learners in a private school in Cebu City during the 2023–2024 school year. Utilizing a convergent mixed-method design, the research integrated a quasi-experimental approach with a descriptive qualitative component. The quantitative phase involved pre-test and post-test assessments of learners exposed to both conventional and interactive teaching methods, which were analyzed using descriptive statistics and t-tests. The qualitative phase employed semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis to capture learners' lived experiences and coping mechanisms in reading. Findings revealed that while both conventional and interactive methods improved learners' reading performance, the interactive approach produced significantly better outcomes. Learners in the experimental group attained higher post-test scores compared to the control group. The least-learned competencies were identified as reading words with consonant blends and digraphs, which continue to be challenging for learners at this developmental stage. Qualitative findings highlighted coping mechanisms such as highlighting texts, consistent class attendance, and active listening as strategies learners used to enhance their reading comprehension. These approaches reflected students' motivation, engagement, and adaptive responses to reading challenges. Overall, the study concludes that interactive learning approaches not only improve reading comprehension but also foster critical thinking, communication, and selfconfidence among learners. The integration of structured interactive strategies into classroom practice creates more dynamic, engaging, and meaningful learning experiences. The findings have implications for curriculum design, teacher professional development, and future innovations in reading instruction.



References:

  1. Abdul Samat, M. S., & Abdul Aziz, A. (2020). The Effectiveness of Multimedia Learning in Enhancing Reading Comprehension Among Indigenous Pupils. Arab World English Journal, 11 (2) 290–302.   DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no2.20 
  2. Amarante, R. G. (2016). The effects of shared reading of Grade 3 pupils in a public school in the Philippines.
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  4. Borjal, W. G. (2014). Phoenix learning package skill builders for efficient reading. Phoenix Publishing House.
  5. Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Harvard University Press.
  6. Cabasada, M. L. A. (2020). Factors that affect the effectiveness of interactive learning approaches in the Philippines.
  7. Cook, D. T., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Expanded foundation of quasi-experimental design. Houghton Mifflin.
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE Publications.
  10. Department of Education. (2016). DepEd order no. 42, series of 2016: Policy guidelines on daily lesson preparation for the K to 12 basic education program. Department of Education.
  11. Firda, A. (2023). Effectiveness of interactive approach in reading skill.
  12. Gerodias, M. A. (2019). The lived experiences of third learners engaging interactive learning approaches in public school in the Philippines.
  13. Gerodias, M. (2022). Opportunities and challenges of interactive learning approaches in the Philippines.
  14. Gonzalo, B. O. (2014). Phoenix publishing house skill builders for efficient reading. Phoenix Publishing House.
  15. Jones, D., Smith, J. K., & Brown, R. (2023). Interactive learning approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 56(1), 23–41.
  16. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
  17. Miller, L. (2017). Lived Experiences of Interactive Learning Approaches among Grade 3 Learners.
  18. Musilla.com. (2013). Interactive learning. Retrieved from https://www.musilla.com
  19. Nurul Hayati, A., Kasim, U., & Muslem, A. (2020). Using Interactive Approach In Enhancing Students’ Reading Comprehension. English Education Journal (EEJ), 11(2), 231-250.
  20. Orendain, M. A. (2014). Phoenix Learning Package: Skills for Efficient Reading. Phoenix Publishing House.
  21. Piaget, J. (1950s–1970s). Theories of cognitive development.
  22. Roaders 203–69. (n.d.). Organization of interactive learning.
  23. Salazar, E. S. (2014). Phoenix publishing house skill builders. Phoenix Publishing House.
  24. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age.
  25. Troika. (2020). Interactive approaches to reading: Working on sub-skills and strategies.
  26. Villamin, A. M. (2014). Phoenix publishing house skill builders. Phoenix Publishing House.