Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 36 no. 10 (2025)

Lived Experiences of Out-of-Field Public School Science Teachers: A Qualitative Research

Jessa Joy Ambroce | Susie Daza

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Teaching out-of-field subjects presents a unique blend of challenges and opportunities for science teachers, significantly shaping their professional experiences and practices. Each teacher’s journey is marked by an interplay of joys, struggles, and adaptive strategies. This study explored the lived experiences of science teachers teaching out-of-field subjects, focusing on their joys, satisfaction, fulfillment, challenges, adaptive strategies, and aspirations. Conducted among science teachers in public secondary schools in the Division of Sultan Kudarat, the research utilized a transcendental phenomenological design to capture the essence of their experiences. Data were systematically collected through validated interview guides, consent forms, and transcription protocols. Thematic analysis revealed 17 relevant themes. Five core themes encapsulated the teachers’ experiences: The Trials of Teaching Beyond Your Field, Preparation is the Heart of Adaptation, The Power of Supportive Communities, Growth Beyond Boundaries, and Bridging Theory and Practice. Teachers’ joys and fulfillment were reflected in themes such as The Joy of Student Success, Turning Challenges into Triumphs, and Growth Through Connection. Challenges were highlighted through themes like Mastering the Material and Lesson Prep Struggles, Resource Hurdles and Instructional Innovation, Classroom Harmony and Student Interaction, and Teaching Evolution and Skill Enhancement. Adaptive strategies revolved around Dynamic Teaching Practices and Collaborative Growth, while future aspirations emphasized Building Future Careers, Embracing Teaching Challenges, and Commitment to Lifelong Learning and Teamwork. This study provides a comprehensive understanding of science teachers’ experiences in teaching out-of-field subjects, unveiling their trials and triumphs. The findings informed the creation of a professional development program designed to equip teachers with strategies, tools, and support to enhance their resilience and effectiveness in out-of-field teaching.



References:

  1. Abulon, E. L. R. (2014). Basic education teachers’ conceptions of their pedagogical knowledge and skills in teaching. Philippine Normal University Research Journal, 2(1), 67-89. DOI: [10.13140/RG.2.2.17271.68002](https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17271.68002)
  2. Acri, M., Hooley, C., Richardson, N., & Moaba, L. (2016). Peer models in mental health for caregivers and families. Community Mental Health Journal, 53(2), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-016-0040-4
  3. Acharya, K. (2023). Exploring experiences of science education teachers on professional development. Orchid Academia Siraha, 2(1), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.3126/oas.v2i1.65600
  4. Akcil, U., Uzunboylu, H., & Kınık, E. (2021). Integration of technology to learning-teaching processes and Google Workspace tools: A literature review. Sustainability, 13(9), 5018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095018
  5. Aldahmash, A., Alshamrani, S., Alshaya, F., & Alsarrani, N. (2019). Research trends in in-service science teacher professional development from 2012 to 2016. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 163-178. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12211a
  6. Alshammari, A. (2023). Integrating technological knowledge into higher education curricula: An essential measure for attaining sustainable development in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 15(22), 15956. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215956
  7. Amaliyah, R. (2024). Analysis of the effectiveness of employee training and development in Islamic boarding schools in improving the quality of education. Jurnal Impresi Indonesia, 3(6), 438–445. https://doi.org/10.58344/jii.v3i6.4954
  8. Anselmo, C. (2024). Algopsychalia of out-of-field teachers: A qualitative inquiry. American Journal of Education and Technology, 3(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v3i3.2285
  9. Baker‐Doyle, K. (2012). First-year teachers' support networks: Intentional professional networks and diverse professional allies. The New Educator, 8(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688x.2012.641870
  10. Bell, M. (2015). “But I wasn’t told to”: Lack of education and workplace policy as barriers in the provision of family planning information. Social Work in Public Health, 30(3), 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2014.1000505
  11. Bellocchi, A., & Ritchie, S. M. (2015). “I was proud of myself that I didn’t give up and I did it”: Experiences of pride and triumph in learning science. Science Education, 99(4), 638–668. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21159
  12. Buenacosa, M., & Petalla, M. (2022). Embracing the unknown: Adaptability and resiliency of out-of-field secondary teachers teaching English in public schools. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2022/v37i2796
  13. Burns, A., & Westmacott, A. (2018). Teacher to researcher: Reflections on a new action research program for university EFL teachers. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 20(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v20n1.66236
  14. Calinog, J. S., & Manalang, P. E. (2016). The impact of teacher’s subject matter knowledge on student achievement: A local study in the Philippines. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(21), 94-101. DOI: [10.13140/RG.2.2.34741.27365](https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34741.27365)
  15. Calinog, N. R., & Manalang, E. B. (2016). The effect of teacher competence on students' academic achievement in science in selected public high schools in the Philippines. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(8), 1265-1284. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21356
  16. Cavaletto, G. (2024). Cooperative and competitive learning as transformative factors of educational processes for extracurricular skill enhancement. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1388937
  17. Chen, J., Zhou, J., Sun, L., Wu, Q., Lu, H., & Tian, J. (2015). A new approach for laboratory exercise of pathophysiology in China based on student-centered learning. AJP Advances in Physiology Education, 39(2), 116–119. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00143.2014
  18. Collie, R., Shapka, J., & Perry, N. (2012). School climate and social-emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1189–1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029356
  19. Coterón, J., Álvarez, E., Ocete, C., & Pérez-Tejero, J. (2020). Teachers’ psychological needs satisfaction and thwarting: Can they explain students’ behavioral engagement in physical education? A multi-level analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 8573. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228573
  20. Cordon, A., & Polong, A. (2020). Teacher Qualifications and Student Performance in Science Education: A Study in the Philippines. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(4), 123–140.
  21. Debois, N., Ledon, A., & Wylleman, P. (2015). A lifespan perspective on the dual career of elite male athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 21, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.07.011
  22. Du Plessis, A. E., Gillies, R. M., & Carroll, A. (2014). Out-of-field teaching and professional development: A transnational investigation. International Journal of Educational Research, 66, 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.02.002
  23. Du, X., Chaaban, Y., Sabah, S., Al-Thani, A., & Wang, L. (2020). Active learning engagement in teacher preparation programmes—A comparative study from Qatar, Lebanon, and China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 40(3), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1717436
  24. Eisen, S., Schultz, M., Mueller, L., Degenhart, C., Clark, J., Resnick, S., … & Sadow, D. (2012). Outcome of a randomized study of a mental health peer education and support group in the VA. Psychiatric Services, 63(12), 1243–1246. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201100348
  25. Erarslan, A. (2023). Cognitive flexibility and grit during times of crisis for Turkish EFL teachers. Psychology in the Schools, 60(7), 2296–2319. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22852
  26. Fortuna, K., Hill, J., Chalker, S., & Ferron, J. (2022). Certified peer support specialists training in technology and delivery of digital peer support services: Cross-sectional study. JMIR Formative Research, 6(12), e40065. https://doi.org/10.2196/40065
  27. Gaffney, T. (2022). Examining the impact of a student-centered learning and assessment strategy on engagement among nursing students. Journal of Quality in Health Care & Economics, 5(4), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.23880/jqhe-16000293
  28. Garba, S., Singh, T., & Yusuf, N. (2013). Integrating technology in teacher education curriculum and pedagogical practices: The effects of web-based technology resources on pre-service teachers’ achievement in teacher education training. Proceedings of ICISTA. https://doi.org/10.2991/icista.2013.14
  29. Glaés-Coutts, L. (2020). University-supported networks as professional development for teachers in school-age educare. International Journal for Research on Extended Education, 8(1), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.3224/ijree.v8i1.06
  30. Goos, M., O’Donoghue, J., Ríordáin, M., Faulkner, F., Hall, T., & O’Meara, N. (2020). Designing a national blended learning program for “out-of-field” mathematics teacher professional development. ZDM, 52(5), 893–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01136-y
  31. Goos, M., Ríordáin, M., Faulkner, F., & Lane, C. (2021). Impact of a national professional development programme for out-of-field teachers of mathematics in Ireland. Irish Educational Studies, 42(3), 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.1964569
  32. Hashemi, A. (2021). Online teaching experiences in higher education institutions of Afghanistan during the COVID-19 outbreak: Challenges and opportunities. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2021.1947008
  33. Hilton, A., Hilton, G., Dole, S., & Goos, M. (2015). School leaders as participants in teachers’ professional development: The impact on teachers’ and school leaders’ professional growth. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(12). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n12.8
  34. Hobbs, L. (2012). Exploring the effectiveness of professional development for out-of-field teachers. Teacher Development, 16(3), 337-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2012.722286
  35. Hobbs, L. (2013). Out-of-field teaching in Australian secondary schools: A structural perspective. Australian Journal of Education, 57(1), 70-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494411305700106
  36. Hoque, F., Yasin, R., & Sopian, K. (2022). Revisiting education for sustainable development: Methods to inspire secondary school students toward renewable energy. Sustainability, 14(14), 8296. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148296
  37. Houghton, N., Houstoun, W., Yates, S., Badley, B., & Kneebone, R. (2021). Cross-disciplinary perspectives on the transition to remote education. BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(6), 586–589. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000814
  38. Hung, C., Sun, J., & Yu, P. (2015). The benefits of a challenge: Student motivation and flow experience in tablet-PC-game-based learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(2), 172–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.997248
  39. Ilgan, A. (2013). Ögretmenler için etkili mesleki gelisim faaliyetleri. Usak University Journal of Social Sciences, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.12780/uusbd174
  40. Ingersoll, R. M. (2002). The out-of-field teaching problem. Educational Researcher. 10.3102/0013189X031001026](https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031001026)
  41. Ingersoll, R. M. (2003). The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 26-37. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X022002026
  42. Ingram, J. (2013). A mixed methods evaluation of peer support in Bristol, UK: Mothers’, midwives’, and peer supporters’ views and the effects on breastfeeding. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-192
  43. Javed, K., Akhtar, A., Nasir, U., Farooq, N., Sikandar, S., & Rizwan, M. (2022). Need of the hour: Student-centered learning in undergraduate medical curriculum. PJMHS, 16(12), 74–76. https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs2022161274
  44. Jiang, X., Shi, D., Fang, L., & Ferraz, R. (2022). Teacher–student relationships and adolescents’ school satisfaction: Behavioral engagement as a mechanism of change. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 1444–1457. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12509
  45. Johnson, K., & Golombek, P. (2011). The transformative power of narrative in second language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 45(3), 486–509. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.256797
  46. Jumraeni, J. (2023). Academic resilience: The roles of parent support and peer support. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan dan Konseling, 22. https://doi.org/10.26858/jppk.v0i0.38854
  47. Kandimba, H., Mandyata, J., & Simalalo, M. (2023). Teachers’ understanding of curriculum adaptation for learners with moderate intellectual disability in Zambia. European Journal of Special Education Research, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejse.v9i1.4653
  48. Kaplan, T. (2023). Integrating virtual teaching in a new era of medical education: Lessons from a neurology course. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 14, 1147–1156. https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s413816
  49. Kenny, J., Hobbs, L., & Whannell, R. (2019). Designing professional development for teachers teaching out-of-field. Professional Development in Education, 46(3), 500–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1613257
  50. Khemakhem, H., Fontaine, R., & Bégin, C. (2021). Teaching corporate governance in an MBA class: An academic note. Accounting Perspectives, 20(2), 171–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12248
  51. Lagria, G. (2021). Pragmatic sentiments and coping strategies of out-of-field English teachers in public senior high schools. International Journal of Qualitative Research, 1(2), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.47540/ijqr.v1i2.355
  52. Lane, C., & Ríordáin, M. (2019). Out-of-field mathematics teachers’ beliefs and practices: An examination of change and tensions using zone theory. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(2), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09964-5
  53. Lent, R., & Brown, S. (2016). Social cognitive career theory in a diverse world. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716657811
  54. Lin, W., Yin, H., & Liu, Z. (2022). The roles of transformational leadership and growth mindset in teacher professional development: The mediation of teacher self-efficacy. Sustainability, 14(11), 6489. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116489
  55. Madulara, M. (2022). Out-of-field teaching: The stories of novice educators in teaching social studies. International Journal of Research Publications, 112(1). https://doi.org/10.47119/ijrp10011211120224116
  56. Melville, W., Bartley, A., & Fazio, X. (2012). Encouraging uncertainty in the “scientific method”: Promoting understanding in the processes of science with preservice teachers. Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education, 12(2), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2012.679995
  57. Miao, F. (2023). Application of diversified teaching strategies in the intelligent physical education platform: Enhancing course interactivity and engagement. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 10(1), 229–233. https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v10i1.11141
  58. Mohammed, S. (2022). Teachers’ beliefs: Positive or negative indicators of inquiry-based science teaching? World Journal of Education, 12(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v12n1p17
  59. Monteiro, R., Monteiro, D., Torregrossa, M., & Travassos, B. (2022). Modeling athletic career of football players: Implications for career management and retirement. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 18(5), 1478–1486. https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541221111616
  60. Mortel, T., Bird, J., Chown, P., Trigger, R., & Ahern, C. (2016). General practitioners as educators in adolescent health: A training evaluation. BMC Family Practice, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0432-0
  61. Morrison, G., & Ross, S. (1998). Evaluating technology‐based processes and products. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1998(74), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.7407
  62. Murtafiah, W., Lukitasati, M., Lestari, N., Zayyadi, M., & Widodo, S. (2022). Decision-making students winning microteaching contests in design lesson plans and their implementation in mathematics learning. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(6), 2045–2060. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i6.7497
  63. Nazari, F., Ghanizadeh, A., & Mirzaee, S. (2022). EFL teachers' coping strategies amidst the COVID-19 virtual education and their association with work engagement and teacher apprehension. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 22(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-022-09317-0
  64. Nguyen, T. (2024). Exploring the role of artificial intelligence-powered facilitator in enhancing digital competencies of primary school teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.1.219
  65. Niess, M. (2001). A model for integrating technology in preservice science and mathematics content-specific teacher preparation. School Science and Mathematics, 101(2), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18011.x
  66. O’Donoghue, C. (2023). Community caring for a family member with brain injury: Women’s lived experiences. Qualitative Health Research, 34(4), 350–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323231210493
  67. Oladele, J., Koledafe, O., & Daramola, D. (2021). Prospects for online instructional delivery using Google Classrooms: Implications for higher education in sub-Sahara Africa. Journal of Digital Learning and Education, 1(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.52562/jdle.v1i3.227
  68. Pacana, N., Ramos, C., Catarata, M., & Inocian, R. (2019). Out-of-field social studies teaching through sustainable culture-based pedagogy: A Filipino perspective. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(3), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2019.73.230.241
  69. Pak, K., Polikoff, M., Desimone, L., & García, E. (2020). The adaptive challenges of curriculum implementation: Insights for educational leaders driving standards-based reform. AERA Open, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420932828
  70. Parker, J., Shum, K., Suldo, S., Shaunessy-Dedrick, E., Ferron, J., & Dedrick, R. (2019). Predictors of adaptive help-seeking across ninth‐grade students enrolled in advanced placement and international baccalaureate courses. Psychology in the Schools, 56(5), 652–669. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22223
  71. Pedida, S. (2023). Plights of tenured teachers in integrating technology in classroom instruction: A phenomenological inquiry. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation, 2(6), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v2i6.1793
  72. Phyak, P., & Baral, R. (2019). Teacher identity in higher education: A phenomenological inquiry. The Batuk, 5(2), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.3126/batuk.v5i2.30119
  73. Plessis, D. (2016). Leading teachers through the storm: Looking beyond the numbers and turning the implications of out-of-field teaching practices into positive challenges. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.06.010
  74. Qi, C. (2019). Current situation and prospect of the research on Chinese English teachers' professional identity. Proceedings of CESSES 2019. https://doi.org/10.2991/cesses-19.2019.94
  75. Rahayu, E., & Osman, S. (2019). Riding out the storm: Out-of-field teaching practice in Indonesia. Humaniora, 10(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v10i2.5628
  76. Rasna, I., Binawati, N., Tantra, D., & Putra, I. (2021). The harmony of instructional communication in the classroom. Proceedings of ASSEHR. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210715.053
  77. Recede, R., Asignado, R., & Castro, M. (2023). Out-of-field teaching: Impact on teachers’ self-efficacy and motivation. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Business and Education Research, 4(2), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber..04.02.19
  78. Romero-García, C., García, O., & Paz-Lugo, P. (2020). Improving future teachers’ digital competence using active methodologies. Sustainability, 12(18), 7798. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187798
  79. Rustan, E. (2023). The English teachers’ strategies for embracing students’ diversities at Indonesian schools in Malaysia. Linguistics Initiative, 3(1), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.53696/27753719.3110
  80. Sepulveda-Escobar, P., & Morrison, A. (2020). Online teaching placement during the COVID-19 pandemic in Chile: Challenges and opportunities. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1820981
  81. Sharplin, E. (2014). Reconceptualising out-of-field teaching: Experiences of rural teachers in Western Australia. Educational Research, 56(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2013.874160
  82. Silva, W., Steinmacher, I., & Conte, T. (2019). Students’ and instructors’ perceptions of five different active learning strategies used to teach software modeling. IEEE Access, 7, 184063–184077. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2929507
  83. Soydan, S. (2023). The relationship between emotional regulation skills and adaptability to the classes of children. Infants & Young Children, 36(2), 110–129. https://doi.org/10.1097/iyc.0000000000000239
  84. Songsiengchai, S., Kewara, P., & Prabjandee, D. (2019). Preparation program for enhancing communicative language teaching ability. International Journal of Education Psychology and Counseling, 318–332. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijepc.4310028
  85. Stefaniak, J., & Tracey, M. (2015). An exploration of student experiences with learner-centered instructional strategies. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6142
  86. Stewart, F., & Way, L. (2023). Beyond boundaries? Disability, DIY, and punk pedagogies. Research in Education, 115(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/00345237231160301
  87. Teixeira, C., Gomes, D., & Borges, J. (2017). Conceptions of accounting and expectations of learning accounting. Review of Business and Legal Sciences, (27), 103. https://doi.org/10.26537/rebules.v0i27.748
  88. Thomas, L., Tuytens, M., Devos, G., Kelchtermans, G., & Vanderlinde, R. (2019). Beginning teachers’ professional support: A mixed methods social network study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 83, 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.04.008
  89. Thomas, L., Tuytens, M., Moolenaar, N., Devos, G., Kelchtermans, G., & Vanderlinde, R. (2019). Teachers’ first year in the profession: The power of high-quality support. Teachers and Teaching, 25(2), 160–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1562440
  90. Toma, R. B., Matheson, I. A., & Kim, J. (2023). Supporting out-of-field science teachers: An analysis of professional development needs and strategies. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 34(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2022.2129998
  91. Uysal, Ş., & Sarier, Y. (2019). Teacher leadership effects on student achievement and student satisfaction: A meta-analysis on the studies published in Turkey and the USA. Croatian Journal of Education - Hrvatski Časopis Za Odgoj I Obrazovanje, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v21i3.3257
  92. Wardoyo, C., Herdiani, A., & Sulikah, S. (2017). Teacher professionalism: Analysis of professionalism phases. International Education Studies, 10(4), 90. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n4p90
  93. Weidlich, J., & Kalz, M. (2021). Exploring predictors of instructional resilience during emergency remote teaching in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00278-7
  94. Wright, A. (2023). An instructional innovation that embeds group learning in case teaching: The table case method. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 48(3), 526–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629231216642
  95. Zakarneh, B. (2022). Tuning learning and teaching strategies to individual differences among learners of English in Arab universities. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 11(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.18488/5019.v11i1.4419
  96. Zee, M., & Koomen, H. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801
  97. Zeng, G., Chen, X., Cheung, H., & Peng, K. (2019). Teachers' growth mindset and work engagement in the Chinese educational context: Well-being and perseverance of effort as mediators. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00839

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic