Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 35 no. 2 (2025)

Project Rendon: Contextualized Module in Colonialism and Imperialism and Academic Performance of Students in Araling Panlipunan

Edelyn Rendon | Mary Grace Gallego

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Reading is a multifaceted process involving the decoding, interpretation, and articulation of printed words, enabling learners to understand and communicate effectively. In social studies, reading interventions are essential as they simultaneously enhance literacy skills and content comprehension, shaping students' cognitive development. This study explored the effectiveness of Project Rendon, a contextualized instructional module focused on colonialism and imperialism, in enhancing the academic performance of Grade 7 students in Araling Panlipunan at Isulan National High School, Sultan Kudarat. Using a true experimental design, the study involved 70 students divided equally into control and experimental groups. Both groups undertook a pretest to assess initial competencies. The experimental group received an eight-week intervention using the developed module, while the control group followed conventional instruction. Posttest assessments measured the academic gains of both groups. The module was evaluated in terms of content, mechanics, organization, and overall package using a validated instructional materials quality scale. Results showed that the module earned an “excellent” rating across all dimensions, suggesting strong instructional value. Statistical analysis using paired and independent t-tests indicated significant improvements in the academic performance of both groups. However, the experimental group showed greater mean gain scores, affirming the module's positive impact on learning outcomes. Although a negligible correlation was found between the perceived quality of the module and students’ posttest scores, the findings highlight that well-designed, contextually relevant instructional materials, when integrated with active learning strategies, can substantially improve student engagement and academic performance. The study emphasizes the importance of contextualization in curriculum development, particularly in modular and distance learning environments prevalent in the post-pandemic education landscape.



References:

  1. ACADEMIC SENATE FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES (2009), Reading Framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress
  2. ANDRIOTIS, NICKOS (2016).     Contextualized Learning: Teaching made Highly Effective! Retrieved, September 6, 2018. https://www.efrontlearning.com/blog/2017/06/contextualized-learning effectiveelearning.html
  3. AUTHENTIC LEARNING MATERIALS AS APPROACH IN TEACHING LITERATURE. (2003) Https://Www.Efrontlearning.Com
  4. BANDURA, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  5. BAYLOR A. L., & RITCHIE, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers & Education, 39(4), 395-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00126-5
  6. BERNS, R. G. & ERICKSON, P. M. (2005). Contextual teaching and learning: Preparing students for the new economy.  http://www.cord.org/uploadedfiles/.
  7. BHATTACHERJEE, A. (2012).    Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices [Textbook]. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/oa_textbooks/3
  8. BONGANCISO, R.T. (2015) Effects of Contextualization of Reading Comprehension Performance of  Filipino Learners, Asia Pacific Higher Education Journal, 2(1), 1-10.
  9. BRUNER (1960). The process of education. Harvard University Press
  10. BUKOYE, R.O. (2018). Utilization of Instruction Materials as Tools for Effective Academic Performance of Students: Implications for Counselling. Proceedings, 2(21), 1395. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2211395
  11. BURNINGHAM, L.M.,& DEVER, M.T. (2005). An interactive model fostering family literacy. Young Children, 60(5)’87-94
  12. CLARK, R. C., & MAYER, R. E. (2016). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  13. CONTEXTUALIZATION. (2005). Https://Files.Eric.Ed.Gov/Fulltext/Ed516783.Pdfhttps://Www.Files.Eric.Ed.Gov
  14. Contextualized approach in teaching. (2007). ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234684911
  15. CRANTON, P. (2006). Understanding and promoting transformative learning: A guide for educators of adults (2nd ed.) Jossey-Bass
  16. DAUD,H.M., YUSSUF, A., & KADIR, A.A. (2023). Influence of the Social Environment on Development of Students’ Morals and Character: Future Issues and Challenges> International Journal of Academic Research in Progessive Education Development, 12(2),1245-1257
  17. DE GUZMAN, M. (2015). The relationship between social development and academic performance among Grade 7 students. Journal of Education and Human Development, 4(1), 1-10.
  18. DEWEY, J. (1916). Democacy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education.Macmillan
  19. ELIAS, M. J., & HAYNES, N. M. (2008). Social competence and academic achievement: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 271-285.
  20. ENG, L. S. JAVED, M., & MOHAMED, A. R. (2015). Developing reading comprehension modules to facilitate reading comprehension among Malaysian secondary school ESL students. International Journal of Instruction, 8(2), 139-154. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1085274
  21. EISNER, E.W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. Yale University Press.
  22. GOL (2021).  National   Education Policy 2020.   Ministry of
  23. Human Resource Development, Government of IndiaGuidelines and processes for LRMDS assessment & Evaluation (2009). Evaluation Rating Sheet for PRINT Resources. Retrieved from https://depedpines.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/6.4Evaluation-Rating-Sheet-for-PRINT-Resources.pdf
  24. JAYSON O YONGCO &JASPER M. DEL VALLE          Development and Evaluation of Instructional Module for Special Program in Journalism Volume 3 Issue 4, December 2022 https://doi.org/10.53378/352948
  25. JIBILILU, O.S. (2024). Evaluating the impact of Instructional Materials on Social Studies Learning Outcomes in Senior High Schools of the Bono East Region of Ghana. Social Education Research, 5(2), 380-397. https://doi.org/10.37256/ser.5220244881
  26. HARUNA, P. (2022). Design, extent of use, and usefulness of instructional materials by student teachers on teaching practice-The mentor’s assessment. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Sciences, 6(6), 394-398
  27. JOHNSON, D. W., JOHNSON, R. T., & SMITH, K. A. (2014). Co-operative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3&4), 85-118.
  28. HEROLD, B.  (2016). Technology in education: an overview. Educ. Week 20.129-141
  29. KANE, T., HICKEY, D., & STAIGER, D. (2016). Teaching higher: Educators’perpectives on hig-quality instructional materials. Brooking Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/
  30. KOEHLER, M.J., & MISHRA, P. (2006).  Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108 (6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  31. LEEDY, P. and OMROD, J. (2001) Practical Research: Planning and Design 7th Edition. (MerrillPrentice Hall and SAGE Publications,)
  32. LIBEN, M., & LIBEN, D. (2019). The importance of high quality instructional materials in early literacy. StandardsWork. https:www.standardswork,org/
  33. MADRAZO, A.L., & DIO, R.V. (2020). Contextualized Learning Modules in Bridging Students’ Learning Gaps in Calculus with Analytic Geometry through Independent Learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3),457.http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.3.12456.457-476
  34. MARZANO (2001).  Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. ASCD
  35. MAYER, R. E. (2019). Multimedia Formats in Instructional Design: Enhancing Retention and Comprehension. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(3), 215-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09700-4
  36. MAZZEO, C., RAB, S. Y., & ALSSID, J. L. (2003). Building bridges to college and careers: Contextualized basic skills programs at towards an R&D program in reading comprehension. Retrieved from http://www.rand. org/content/dam/rand/pubs/ monograph_\
  37. MEZIROW, J. (2000). Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspective on a Theory in Progress. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
  38. MIRRILL, M.D. (2002), First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research Development, 50(3) 43-49.hhtps://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505024
  39. MISHRA, P., & KOEHLER, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=12574  
  40. MOGHADDAS, B. (2013). The effect of contextualization on the iranian EFL learners’ Performance in reading tasks.  International Journal of Educational Science and Research (IJESR). 3(2), 11-20. Retrieved from  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236665438
  41. MORATO JR., E.A. (2016). Entrepreneurship. Rex Printing Company, Incorporated. ISBN: 9789712378102
  42. NG, P.K., & KARJANTO, N. (2023). Active learning in mathematical economics: An experimental study among foundation students in Malaysia. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.12837
  43. PAPPAS, C. (2013). The Adult Learning Theory-Andragoy-of Malcom Knwoles, eLearning industry.http://elearningindustry.com/the adult-learning-theory-androgogy-of-malcom-knowles
  44. PIAGET., J. (1936). La naissance de I’intelligence chez I’enfant The origin of intelligence in the child) Delacahux et Niestle
  45. POLAT, M..& ERISTI, B, (2019). The effects of authentic video materials on foreign language listening skill development and listening anxiety in different levels of English proficiency. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research 6 (1). Retrieved from  hhtps:llwww. researchgate.net
  46. POLIKOFF, M. (2021). The challenges of curriculum-based reform in education. Harvard education Press. https://www.brookings.edu/
  47. RAHMAN, K.A.; MOKTHAR,S.A.; ARIFIN, N.A.M.; ISMAILl, M.N.;AZIZ,
  48. T.M.F.T.A. Conceptual Framework: Factors Affecting Learner Performance and Cognitive Load in Educational Multimedia Learning. Proceedings 2022, 82(1), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022082056
  49. REYES, R. (2012). The effect of tutoring on the academic performance of students with difficulties in Araling Panlipunan. Journal of Education and Research, 2(1), 1-10.
  50. SANTOS, R. (2018). The impact of mentoring on the social development and academic performance of students with difficulties in Araling Panlipunan. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 8(1), 1-12.
  51. SMITH, J., JOHNSON, R., & WILLIAMS, L. (2018). Enhancing Learning Through Relevant and Comprehensive Content. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9432-1
  52. STEINER, D. (2023). The evidence based for high-quality instructional materials. Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/
  53. STEINER, D., & JENSEN, B. (2018). Better Curriculum, better learning. Learning First. https://www.learningfirst.org/
  54. TAYLOR & FRANCIS (2002). http://dx.doi .or/10.1080/09243453.2011.652125, http://www.tandfonline.com
  55. VYGOTSKY  L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press
  56. WENTZEL, K. R. (1991). Social competence and academic achievement: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 185-196

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic