What People Are Saying About City Libraries in Metro Manila: Insights from Google Maps Reviews
Luis Ezra D. Cruz | Agnes S. Barsaga
Discipline: library and information science
Abstract:
Public libraries play a central role in fostering equitable access to information, lifelong learning, and social inclusion within their communities. Evaluating how effectively these libraries fulfill these roles is essential for ensuring that services remain responsive to user needs. While traditional assessment tools, such as surveys and usage statistics, provide valuable quantitative insights, they often overlook the spontaneous and candid perspectives that reflect genuine user experiences. This study examines the potential of online review platforms, specifically Google Maps, as alternative sources of user feedback for evaluating public library services. The research focused on city libraries in Metro Manila, Philippines and employed qualitative content analysis and sentiment analysis of user-generated reviews. Nine city libraries with sufficient reviews within the predetermined date range were analyzed using Taguette for thematic coding and TextBlob for sentiment classification. Findings revealed six recurring themes: service quality, collections, facilities, accessibility, programs, and technology. Service quality and facilities emerged as the most frequently mentioned areas. Overall sentiment toward Metro Manila city libraries was largely positive, with users highlighting courteous staff and well-maintained facilities. However, concerns were raised about inconsistent operating hours, limited technological infrastructure, and outdated online information. The study shows that online reviews provide valuable and timely insights into user experiences and expectations, complementing formal evaluation mechanisms. It recommends that city libraries in Metro Manila adopt systematic monitoring of online feedback, strengthen their digital presence, and address operational and infrastructural gaps to improve user satisfaction.
References:
- Agyekum, B. O. (2022). Public libraries and sustainable community development: A review of roles and challenges. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1–15.
- Bongo, M. F., &Acosta, L. A. (2023). Client’s assessment on the accessibility, user-friendliness, and relevance of e-resources of a public library in the Philippines. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4644740
- Borrego, Á., & Comalat Navarra, M. (2021). What users say about public libraries: An analysis of Google Maps reviews. Online Information Review, 45(1), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-09-2019-0291
- Campana, K., Mills, J. E., Kociubuk, J., & Martin, M. H. (2022). Access, advocacy, and impact: How public libraries are contributing to educational equity for children and families in underserved communities. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 36(4), 561576. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2021.2017375
- Chen, K., & Chang, C.-W. (2024). Reimagining library services through user feedback: A framework for integrating digital review platforms. Library Management, 45(1), 3448. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-05-2022-0053
- de Oliveira Silva, A., de Souza Pinto, A. L., & Lima, H. M. de. (2025). Information literacy and social protagonism: The role of public libraries in Belém, Pará. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação, 17(1), 1–15. https://www.scielo.br/j/rdbci/a/PCzcftwDhNybdsMKsXGwSRg/abstract/?lang=en#
- Dorado, R. P. (2010). Assessment of the quality services of libraries of state universities and colleges in Iloilo City [Master’s thesis, Central Philippine University]. CPU Institutional Repository. https://repository.cpu.edu.ph/handle/20.500.12852/611
- Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
- Fagyan, C. K., Macalingay, M. B., Abellada, A. P., Munar, B. B., Depnag, M. C., & Kitani, A. B. M. (2023). The impact of library use frequency on student satisfaction: An evaluation of resources, services, and facilities. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 7(1), 339–346. https://www.irejournals.com/paper-details/1704885irejournals.com
- Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
- Hong, H., Kim, H.-S., & Lennon, S. J. (2018). The effects of perceived quality and usefulness of consumer reviews on review reading and purchase intention. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 31, 70–84.
- Hossain, M. J., Chowdhury, M. T., Rahman, H., Hossain, M. S., Shara, S. A., & others. (2024). Detection of deceptive hotel reviews through the application of machine learning techniques. In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (Vol. 1030, pp. 445–456). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3594-5_38
- Husain, A. J. A., Alsharo, M., AlRababah, S. A., & Jaradat, M.-I. R. (2023). Content-rating consistency of online product review and its impact on helpfulness: A fine-grained level sentiment analysis. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 18, 177–200. https://doi.org/10.28945/5187
- Khan, A. M., & Loan, F. A. (2022). Exploring the reviews of Google Maps to assess the user opinions about public libraries. Library Management, 43(1/2), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-05-2022-0053 35
- Killick, S., van Weerden, A., & van Weerden, F. J. (2014). Using LibQUAL+® to identify commonalities in customer satisfaction: The secret to success? Performance Measurement and Metrics, 15(2), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-04-2014-0012
- Kim, J., & Lee, J. (2021). An analysis of spatial accessibility changes according to the attractiveness index of public libraries using social media data. Sustainability, 13(16), 9087. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169087
- Lee, J., & Hong, I. B. (2021). The influence of situational constraints on consumers’ evaluation and use of online reviews: A heuristic–systematic model perspective. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(5), 748–767. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16050085
- Magnani, M. (2020). The economic and behavioral consequences of online user reviews. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(3), 616–642. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12357
- McIntyre, S. H., McQuarrie, E. F., & Shanmugam, R. (2016). How online reviews create social network value: The role of feedback versus individual motivation. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24(3–4), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2015.1095218
- Mussell, J., & Gordon, C. (2017). Uncovering the evidence: Faculty perceptions of distance library services. Journal of Library and Information Services in Distance Learning, 11(3–4), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2017.1347121
- National Library of the Philippines. (2024). Directory of affiliated public libraries. https://web.nlp.gov.ph/directory-2/
- Republic Act No. 7743. (1994). An act providing for the establishment of congressional, city and municipal libraries and barangay reading centers throughout the Philippines. https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1994/ra_7743_1994.html
- Roy, A., Khare, A., Liu, B. S. C., Hawkes, L. M., & Swiatek-Kelley, J. (2012). An investigation of affect of service using a LibQUAL+™ survey and an experimental study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38(5), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.03.018
- Schufreider, B., & Romaine, S. (2008). Making sense of your usage statistics. The Serials Librarian, 54(1–2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/03615260801974164
- Schoenmueller, V., Netzer, O., & Stahl, F. (2020). The polarity of online reviews: Prevalence, drivers, and implications. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(6), 1121–1145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243720941832
- Scott, R. (2011). Strategies that public libraries use to build communities. Public Library Quarterly, 30(4), 307–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2011.625604.
- Tuble, R. M., & Bayoneta, M. J. A. R. (2020). The performance of public libraries in Negros Occidental, Philippines. Philippine Social Science Journal, 2(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.52006/main.v2i2.89
ISSN 2423-2254 (Online)
ISSN 2423-1916 (Print)