Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 35 no. 9 (2025)

Acceptability of Online Registration of the SEC to the Farmers and Fisherfolks in the Eastern Gumaca Quezon

Iglserio Torres Jr | Melchor Espiritu

Discipline: Agriculture

 

Abstract:

This study examined the acceptability of online registration processes of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) among farmers and fisherfolks in Eastern Gumaca, Quezon. Amid digital transformations in governance and growing interest in e-services, understanding how marginalized sectors engage with formal registration systems is critical for inclusive development. The research employed a descriptive cross-sectional design and surveyed 100 farmers and fisherfolks using a validated questionnaire focused on business profiles, level of acceptability of SEC registration, and perceived effects of registration. Results revealed that 65% of respondents had not registered with the SEC, primarily due to lack of awareness, documentation, or technical support. Business profiles showed a dominance of microenterprises and sole proprietorships, with minimal VAT registration and limited formal tax compliance. The level of acceptability of online SEC registration was rated “moderately acceptable” overall, with respondents showing higher acceptance for simplified components such as business name verification but lower acceptance for complex legal procedures like filing articles of incorporation and submitting bylaws. Significant differences in acceptability were found based on SEC and BIR registration status and business size, but not by form of business organization. Findings indicate that prior exposure to regulatory processes enhances acceptance, while microbusinesses and non-tax-registered respondents perceive online registration as burdensome. The study concludes that while there is moderate willingness to engage with SEC registration, practical and procedural barriers remain. It recommends targeted support programs, simplified legal documentation, integrated SEC-BIR processes, and education campaigns to boost regulatory compliance and digital participation among rural entrepreneurs.



References:

  1. Abu-Shanab, E. and Bataineh, L.Q. (2024). Challenges facing e-government projects: how to avoid failure? International Journal of Emerging Sciences, 4(4), pp.207-217.
  2. Al-Mahameed, Isoud Mohammed (2022). The impact of perceived reliability of electronic business systems in user satisfaction: an empirical study in Jordan telecom companies. Management science, 39 (2), pp.163-181.
  3. Bojang, M. B. (2021). Critical Factors Influencing e-Government Adoption in The Gambia. Society & Sustainability, 3(1), 39-51.
  4. Botchway, E.A., Yeboah-Boateng, E.O. and Kwofie, T.E. (2021). Benefits of e-governance implementation in physical infrastructure development at the local government level. Electronic government, an International Journal, 12(4), pp.395-405.
  5. Buchanan-Clarke, S., & Mashingaidze, S. (2021). Rebuilding Constitutionalism and Rule of Law in Zimbabwe.
  6. Burgueño, R., & Medina-Casaubón, J. (2021). Validity and reliability of the interpersonal behaviors questionnaire in physical education with Spanish secondary school students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 128(1), 522-545.
  7. Ceesay, L. B., & Bojang, M. B. (2020). Embracing E-government during the covid-19 pandemic and beyond: insights from the Gambia. Global Journal of Management and Business Research: A Administration and Management, 20(13), 33-41
  8. Chaushi, A., Chaushi, B. A., & Ismaili, F. (2021). Measuring e-Government Maturity: A metasynthesis approach. SEEU Rev, 11(2), 51-67.
  9. Choi, M., Lee, J., & Hwang, K. (2019). Information systems security (ISS) of E-Government for sustainability: A dual path model of ISS influenced by institutional isomorphism. Sustainability, 10(5), 1555.
  10. Cruz, M., & Mendoza, J. (2020). Barriers to small business compliance in the Philippines: A regulatory and economic perspective. Philippine Journal of Business and Development, 12(2), 45-67.
  11. Dahiya, B. P. (2019). Impact Of ICT In Developing World. Business Management and Social Innovations, 401.
  12. De La Cruz, P. (2021). Challenges in digital business registration: Assessing the impact of online platforms on rural entrepreneurs. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Digital Transformation, 5(1), 22-39.
  13. García-Sánchez, I.M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B. and Frias-Aceituno, J. (2022). Determinants of e-government development: Some methodological issues. Journal of Management and Strategy, 3(3), p.11.
  14. Gonzalez, R., & Tan, L. (2021). The role of business size in regulatory compliance: A study of SMEs and micro-enterprises in agricultural sectors. Philippine Economic Review, 18(1), 88-103.
  15. Heeks, R. (2022). Deriving an ICT4D research agenda: A commentary on ‘information and Communication Technologies for Development (ICT4D): Solutions seeking problems?’ Journal of Information Technology, 27(4), 339–341. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2012.31
  16. Heeks, R. (2021). Foundations of ICT4D, Information and Communication Technology for Development (ICT4D), 37–95, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315652603-3
  17. Heidari, H., Mousakhani M. and Rashidi, H. (2024). The Impact of Traditional and Electronic Service Quality on Customer Satisfaction, Trust and Loyalty in Banking Industry. International Journal of Scientific Management and Development, 2(11), 614-620.
  18. Holton, J. A. (2019). Teaching and learning grounded theory methodology: The seminar approaches. The SAGE Handbook of Current Developments in Grounded Theory, 415– 434. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526485656.n22
  19. Hooda Nandal, A., & Singla, M. L. (2019). Investigating the impact of metaphors on citizens’ adoption of e-governance in developing countries: an empirical study. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 13(1), 34-61.
  20. Jallow, A. K. (2022). Formulation of Integrated e-Government Implementation Framework (eGovIF): case of developing economies.
  21. Jamshed J. M. (2021). An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between e government and Corruption. Retrieved from http://www.uhu.es/ijdar/10.4192/1577-8517-v12_6.pdf
  22. Jorge-Pagán, J., Ojeda-Castro, A. M., Valera-Márquez, J., & González, M. A. (2020). ESSENTIALS ISSUES FOR E-GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY. Issues in Information Systems, 21(1).
  23. Kayabsi, A., Celik B., Buyukarslan, A. (2023). The analysis of the relationship among perceived electronic service quality, total service quality and total satisfaction in Banking sector. International Journal of Human Sciences, 10(2), pp.304-325.
  24. Koen, B., Loosveldt, G., Vandenplas, C., & Stoop, I. (2022). Response rates in the European Social Survey: Increasing, decreasing, or a matter of fieldwork effort. Survey methods: Insights from the field, 1-12.
  25. Lin, F., Fofanah, S. S., & Liang, D. (2021). Assessing citizen adoption of e-Government initiatives in Gambia: A validation of the technology acceptance model in information systems success. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 271-279.
  26. Nyoni, T., Mutongi, C. and Munyaradzi, N. (2019). Population dynamics in the Gambia: an ARIMA approach.
  27. Obedait, A. A., Youssef, M., & Ljepava, N. (2019). Citizen-centric approach in delivery of smart government services. In Smart technologies and innovation for a sustainable future (pp. 73-80). Springer, Cham.
  28. Pineda, S., & Ramos, E. (2020). Understanding the gaps in business registration among micro and small enterprises: A case study in rural communities. Southeast Asian Business Review, 9(3), 15-29.
  29. Queirós, A., Faria, D. and Almeida, F., (2021). Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studies.
  30. Sachan, A., Kumar, R& Kumar, R. (2022). "Examining the impact of e government service process on user satisfaction", Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 321-336
  31. Sanayel, A. and Jokar, A. (2023). Determining the Effect of Electronic Services Quality on Satisfaction. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(4), 103-111.
  32. Santa, R., MacDonald, J. B., & Ferrer, M. (2019). The role of trust in e-Government effectiveness, operational effectiveness and user satisfaction: Lessons from Saudi Arabia in e-G2B. Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 39-50. 
  33. Santos, C., & Reyes, M. (2022). Legal formalities and the informal economy: Why rural businesses struggle with registration and taxation compliance. Journal of Public Policy and Economic Studies, 7(2), 67-81.
  34. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2019). Annual compliance report on business registration and online filing efficiency. Manila, Philippines: SEC Regulatory Affairs Division.
  35. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2021). Trends and challenges in online registration: Analysis of compliance among SMEs and micro-enterprises. Manila, Philippines: SEC Business Registration Bureau.
  36. Villanueva, J. (2019). The influence of business structure on registration compliance: An empirical study on sole proprietorships, partnerships, and corporations. Philippine Journal of Business Policy, 6(4), 98-117.
  37. Wariri, O., Okomo, U., Cerami, C., Okoh, E., Oko, F., Jah, H., Bojang, K., Susso, B., Olatunji, Y., Nkereuwem, E. and Akemokwe, F.M., (2021). Establishing and operating a ‘virtual ward’ system to provide care for patients with COVID-19 at home: experience from The Gambia. BMJ Global Health, 6(6), p.e 005883.
  38. World Bank Report (2022). Digital Economy Diagnostic the Gambia. Retrieved from https://www.digitaldevelopmentpartnership.org/pdflibrary/The_Gambia_Digital_Economy_Diagnostic_Report.pdf
  39. World Bank. (2020). The Gambia Economic Update, December 2020: Preserving the Gains. World Bank.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic