Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 34 no. 2 (2025)

The Level of Learning Motivation, the Perceived Impact of ChatGPT as an Academic Assistance Tool, and the Academic Performance of Senior High School Students in a Private Institution

Marvin Victor Cutaran | Bernadiene Agduyeng | Sean Kristoffer Fernandez | Tristan Juhro Romero | Alessandra Chelseia Tuazon | Kristel Joy Dapiawen | Shiellah Mae Barsicula | Lady Valen Charon Dela Peña

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

As technology becomes increasingly prevalent in education, artificial intelligence (AI) tools like Chat Generative PreTrained Transformer (ChatGPT) have emerged as significant resources in academic settings. In this context, parents and educators play a crucial role in ensuring students effectively use these tools while maintaining high motivation and academic success. To explore this relationship, this study employed a descriptive-comparative-correlational design to assess the level of learning motivation, the perceived impact of ChatGPT as an academic assistance tool, and the academic performance of senior high school students at Saint Mary’s University. By utilizing a mixed-method approach, the research combined quantitative data gathered via a Likert scale with qualitative insights from an openended question. Specifically, a purposive sampling technique was used to select 229 senior high school students. Analysis of the data revealed that students were motivated in their studies and perceived ChatGPT’s impact positively as an academic assistance tool. Moreover, notable variations were observed in learning motivation across different sexes and levels of educational proficiency, as well as in the perceived impact of ChatGPT relative to educational proficiency levels. Furthermore, a moderately low positive correlation was found between learning motivation and academic performance, while very low correlations were noted between ChatGPT’s perceived impact and both academic performance and learning motivation. However, the study has limitations due to its small sample size and the uneven distribution of participants across various strands and tracks and proficiency levels, which affected the generalizability of the results. Future researchers should address these limitations for a more comprehensive understanding of the topic. Ultimately, the findings provide a foundation for developing educational strategies and targeted interventions involving parents in boosting student motivation and academic performance.



References:

  1. Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Ballesteros, M. a. A., Vargas, C. G. a. P., Ulloa, M. N. O., Ulloa, C. R. G., Romero, J. M. P., Jaramillo, N. D. G., Orellana, H. U. C., Anzoátegui, D. X. A., & Roca, C. L. (2024). Knowledge, attitudes, and perceived Ethics regarding the use of ChatGPT among generation Z university students. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00157-4
  2. Agapito, J. J. (2023). User Perceptions and Privacy Concerns Related to Using ChatGPT in Conversational AI Systems. Available at SSRN 4440366
  3. Ahmadi, A. (2023). ChatGPT: Exploring the threats and opportunities of artificial intelligence in the age of Chatbots. Asian Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 12(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.51983/ajcst-2023.12.1.3567
  4. Ahmed, A. (2023). Chat GPT achieved one million users in record time - revolutionizing Time-Saving in various fields. Digital Information World. https://www.digitalinformationworld.com/2023/01/chat-gpt-achieved-one-million-users in.html#:%7E:text=As%20per%20the%20recent%20reports,to%20reach%20a%20similar%20hallmark
  5. Akpan, I. D. (2000). Single Parenting and Social Adjustment of Adolescent Students. University of Uyo Journal of Women Academics (UJOWACS). 1(1), 164 – 125
  6. Ali, J. K. M., Shamsan, M. a. A., Hezam, T. A., & Mohammed, A. a. Q. (2023). Impact of CHATGPT on learning motivation: Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v2i1.51
  7. APA Dictionary of Psychology. (2018). https://dictionary.apa.org/motivation
  8. Arokiaraj, K. A., & et al. (2024). Investigating the relationship between student motivation and academic performance. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(5), 2713–2727. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i5.3327
  9. Awan, R, Noureen, G., Naz, A. (2011). A Study of Relationship between Achievement Motivation, Self concept and Achievement in English and Mathematics at Secondary level. International Education Studies, 4(3), 72 – 79.
  10. Babad, E. (2007). Teachers’ Nonverbal Behavior and its Effects on Students. In Springer eBooks (pp. 201–261). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5742-3_7
  11. Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Harvard University Press
  12. Balhorn, L. S., Weber, J. M., Buijsman, S., Hildebrandt, J., Ziefle, M., & Schweidtmann, A. M. (2024). Empirical assessment of ChatGPT’s answering capabilities in natural science and engineering. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54936-7
  13. Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2003). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Review of Economic Studies, 70, 489-520.
  14. Berger, J., & Karabenick, S. A. (2011). Motivation and students’ use of learning strategies: Evidence of unidirectional effects in mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.06.002
  15. Bettayeb, A. M., Talib, M. A., Altayasinah, A. Z. S., & Dakalbab, F. (2024). Exploring the impact of ChatGPT: conversational AI in education. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1379796
  16. Bo, W. V., & Fu, M. (2018). How is learning motivation shaped under different contexts: An ethnographic study in the changes of adult learner’s motivational beliefs and behaviors within a foreign language course. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01603
  17. Bosire, J. P. O. (2024). Preschool teachers’ beliefs about children, self-efficacy, classroom quality and children’s early language. The Journal of Educational Research, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2024.2329581
  18. Bouzar, A., Idrissi, K. E., & Ghourdou, T. (2024). GENDER DIFFERENCES IN PERCEPTIONS AND USAGE OF CHATGPT. International Journal of Humanities and Educational Research, 06(02), 571–582. https://doi.org/10.47832/2757-5403.25.32
  19. Bovermann, K., Weidlich, J., & Bastiaens, T. (2018). Online learning readiness and attitudes towards gaming in gamified online learning – a mixed methods case study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0107-0
  20. Brandmiller, C., Schnitzler, K., & Dumont, H. (2023). Teacher perceptions of student motivation and engagement: longitudinal associations with student outcomes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39(2), 1397–1420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00741-1
  21. Brenner, C. A. (2022). Self-regulated learning, self-determination theory and teacher candidates’ development of competency-based teaching practices. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00184-5
  22. Bridges, D. (2009). Research quality assessment in education: impossible science, possible art? British Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 497–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920903111565
  23. Brookhart, S. M. (2008). How to give effective feedback to your students. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  24. Caratiquit, K., & Caratiquit, L. J. C. (2023). ChatGPT as an academic support tool on the academic performance among students: The mediating role of learning motivation. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 4(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v4i1.1558
  25. Cascella, M., Montomoli, J., Bellini, V., & Bignami, E. (2023). Evaluating the feasibility of CHATGPT in Healthcare: An analysis of multiple clinical and research scenarios. Journal of Medical Systems, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-023-01925-4
  26. Cavallo, A. M. L., Rozman, M., Blinkenstaff, J., & Walker, N. (2003). Students’ learning approaches, reasoning abilities, motivational goals and epistemological beliefs in differing college science courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 33, 18-23.
  27. Çelik, O. (2024). Academic motivation in adolescents: the role of parental autonomy support, psychological needs satisfaction and self-control. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1384695
  28. Chai, C. S., Lin, P.-Y., Jong, M. S.-Y., Dai, Y., Chiu, T. K. F., & Qin, J. (2021). Perceptions of and Behavioral Intentions towards Learning Artificial Intelligence in Primary School Students. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 89–101. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27032858
  29. Chassignol, M., Хорошавин, А. В., Klímová, A., & Bilyatdinova, A. (2018). Artificial Intelligence trends in education: a narrative overview. Procedia Computer Science, 136, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.233
  30. Chatterjee, J., & Dethlefs, N. (2023). This new conversational AI model can be your friend, philosopher, and guide . . . and even your worst enemy. Patterns, 4(1), 100676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.100676
  31. Chen, E., Huang, R., Chen, H., Tseng, Y., & Li, L. Y. (2023). GPTutor: a ChatGPT-powered programming tool for code explanation. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2305.01863
  32. Ciolacu, M., Binder, L., & Popp, H. (2019). Enabling IoT in Education 4.0 with BioSensors from Wearables and Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/siitme47687.2019.8990763
  33. Coan, J. A., & Gottman, J. M. (2007). The Specific Affect Coding System (SPAFF). (pp. 267–285). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195169157.003.0017
  34. Cotton, D., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
  35. Coursera (2024). What is artificial intelligence? Definition, uses, and types. Coursera. https://www.coursera.org/articles/what-is-artificial-intelligence
  36. Csiksezentmihalyi, M., & Nakamura, J. (1989). The dynamics of intrinsic motivation: A study of adolescents. In C. Ames, & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Goals and cognitions (Vol. 3, pp. 45-72). San Diego: Academic Press
  37. Cui, Y., Zhang, D., & Leung, F. K. S. (2019). The influence of parental educational involvement in early childhood on 4th grade students’ mathematics achievement. Early Education and Development, 32(1), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2019.1677131
  38. De Silva, G. H. B. A., Sandanayake, T., & Firdhous, M. (2023). ChaTGPT in Higher Education: A Comprehensive Review of its Impact on Student research. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16000.20485
  39. DeLong, M., & Winter, D. (2002). Strategies for motivating students. Learning to teach and teaching to learn mathematics: Resources for professional development (pp.159-168). Washington, D. C.: Mathematical Association of America.
  40. Du Boulay, B. (2016). Artificial intelligence as an effective classroom assistant. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 31(6), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1109/mis.2016.93
  41. Duchatelet, D., & Donche, V. (2019). Fostering self-efficacy and self-regulation in higher education: a matter of autonomy support or academic motivation? Higher Education Research & Development/Higher Education Research and Development, 38(4), 733–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1581143
  42. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M. Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D... & Wright, R. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
  43. Ekin, S. (2023). Prompt Engineering For ChatGPT: A Quick Guide To Techniques, Tips, And Best Practices. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.22683919.v2
  44. Elliott, A.J., & Dweck, C.S. (2005). Handbook of competence and motivation. New York: Guilford Press
  45. Evans, M. A., & Shaw, D. (2008). Home grown for reading: Parental contributions to young children’s emergent literacy and word recognition. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(2), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.2.89
  46. Fan, W., & Williams, C. M. (2009). The effects of parental involvement on students’ academic self‐efficacy, engagement and intrinsic motivation. Educational Psychology, 30(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903353302
  47. Feldman, R. S. (2005). Understanding Psychology 7th E. New York: McGraw Hill Higher Education.
  48. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
  49. Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Watt, H. M. G. (2010). Development of Mathematics Interest in Adolescence: Influences of gender, family, and school context. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 507–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00645.x
  50. Geng, J., & Razali, A. B. (2020). Tapping the potential of Pigai Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) program to give feedback on EFL writing. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(12B), 8334-8343. https://doi.org/10.13189/ UJER.2020.082638
  51. Gonzalez-DeHass, A. R., Willems, P. P., & Holbein, M. F. D. (2005). Examining the relationship between parental involvement and student motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-3949-7
  52. Grolnick, W. S. (2009). The role of parents in facilitating autonomous self-regulation for education. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104321
  53. Haque, M. A., & Li, S. (2024). Exploring ChatGPT and its impact on society. AI And Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00435-4
  54. Harter, S. (1978). Effectance motivation reconsidered: Toward a developmental model. Human Development, 21, 34-64.
  55. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
  56. Helberger, N., & Diakopoulos, N. (2023). ChatGPT and the AI Act. Internet Policy Review, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.14763/2023.1.1682
  57. Hetler, A. (2024, July 31). What is ChatGPT? WhatIs. https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/ChatGPT
  58. Hill, N. E., & Taylor, L. C. (2004). Parental school involvement and children’s academic achievement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(4), 161–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00298.x
  59. Hmoud, M., Swaity, H., Hamad, N., Karram, O., & Daher, W. (2024). Higher education students’ task motivation in the Generative Artificial Intelligence context: the case of ChatGPT. Information, 15(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15010033
  60. Hsu, H. K., Wang, C., & Levesque‐Bristol, C. (2019). Reexamining the impact of self-determination theory on learning outcomes in the online learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 24(3), 2159–2174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09863-w
  61. Hua, S., Jin, S., & Jiang, S. (2023). The limitations and ethical considerations of CHATGPT. Data Intelligence, 6(1), 201–239. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00243
  62. Huang, S. L., & Shiu, J. H. (2012). A user-centric adaptive learning system for e-learning 2.0. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 214-225.
  63. Ippolito, D., Yuan, A., Coenen, A., & Burnam, S. (2022). Creative Writing with an AI-Powered Writing Assistant: Perspectives from Professional Writers. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2211.05030
  64. Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023). Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(2), 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115
  65. Jeno, L. M., Adachi, P. J. C., Grytnes, J., Vandvik, V., & Deci, E. L. (2018). The effects of m‐learning on motivation, achievement and well‐being: A Self‐Determination Theory approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 669–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12657
  66. Jowarder, M. I. (2023). The Influence of ChatGPT on Social Science Students: Insights Drawn from Undergraduate Students in the United States. Indonesian Journal of Innovation and Applied Sciences, 3(2), 194–200. https://doi.org/10.47540/ijias.v3i2.878
  67.  Juhász, L., Mooney, P., Hochmair, H. H., & Guan, B. (2023). ChatGPT as a mapping assistant: A novel method to enrich maps with generative AI and content derived from street-level photographs. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2306.03204
  68. Jungert, T., Levine, S., & Koestner, R. (2020). Examining how parent and teacher enthusiasm influences motivation and achievement in STEM. The Journal of Educational Research, 113(4), 275–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1806015
  69. Kaledio, P., Robert, A., & Frank, L. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on students’ learning experience. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4716747
  70. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., . . . Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
  71. Keith, T. (2022). Combating academic dishonesty, Part 1 – understanding the problem. The University of Chicago. https://academictech.uchicago.edu/2022/02/16/ combating-academic-dishonesty-part-1-understandingthe-problem/
  72. Keller, M. M., Goetz, T., Becker, E. S., Morger, V., & Hensley, L. (2014). Feeling and showing: A new conceptualization of dispositional teacher enthusiasm and its relation to students’ interest. Learning and Instruction, 33, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.03.001
  73. Kiemer, K., Gröschner, A., Pehmer, A., & Seidel, T. (2015). Effects of a classroom discourse intervention on teachers’ practice and students’ motivation to learn mathematics and science. Learning and Instruction, 35, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.10.003
  74. Kung, T. H., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon, L., Elepaño, C., Madriaga, M., Aggabao, R., Diaz-Candido, G., Maningo, J., & Tseng, V. (2023). Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLOS Digital Health, 2(2), e0000198. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198
  75. Kusurkar, R. A., Cate, O. T., Vos, C. M., Westers, P., & Croiset, G. (2012). How motivation affects academic performance: a structural equation modelling analysis. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 18(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9354-3
  76. Lee, D., & Yeo, S. (2022). Developing an AI-based chatbot for practicing responsive teaching in mathematics. Computers and Education/Computers & Education, 191, 104646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104646
  77. Lee, H. (2023). The rise of ChatGPT: Exploring its potential in medical education. Anatomical Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2270
  78. Lee, Y., Hwang, G., & Chen, P. (2022). Impacts of an AI-based chabot on college students’ after-class review, academic performance, self-efficacy, learning attitude, and motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(5), 1843–1865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10142-8
  79. Li, Y., Hu, T., Ge, T., & Auden, E. (2019). The relationship between home-based parental involvement, parental educational expectation and academic performance of middle school students in mainland China: A mediation analysis of cognitive ability. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.08.003
  80. Liu, J., Shen, D., Zhang, Y., Dolan, B., Carin, L., & Chen, W. (2022). What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.deelio-1.10
  81. Llanga, E., Silva, M., y Vistin Remache, J. (2019). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation in the student. Atlante Education and Development Notebooks. https://www.eumed.net/rev/atlante/2019/09/motivacion-extrinseca intrinseca.htm
  82. Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of CHATGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
  83. Lu, C., & Cutumisu, M. (2022). Online engagement and performance on formative assessments mediate the relationship between attendance and course performance. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00307-5
  84. Lund, B., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S. R., & Wang, Z. (2023). ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(5), 570–581. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24750
  85. Maggiolini, L. M. (2013). Motivational Strategies in a Digital Age: Phones and Facebook in a classroom. Classroom, 24, 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2013.24.83-97
  86. Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: a mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9
  87. Makewa, L. N. (2019). Constructivism Theory in Technology-Based Learning. In Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series (pp. 268–287). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5915-3.ch015
  88. Martín-Núñez, J. L., Ar, A. Y., Fernández, R. P., Abbas, A., & Radovanović, D. (2023). Does intrinsic motivation mediate perceived artificial intelligence (AI) learning and computational thinking of students during the COVID-19 pandemic? Computers and Education. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100128
  89. Masoudi, H. (2024). Effectiveness of ChatGPT in Improving English Writing Proficiency among Non-native English Speakers. International Journal of Educational Sciences and Arts, 3(4), 62–84. https://doi.org/10.59992/ijesa.2023.v3n4p2
  90. Mata, L., Pedro, I., & Peixotoa, F. J. (2018). Parental support, student motivational orientation and achievement: The impact of emotions.
  91. Matari, A. S. A., Udhubi, K. H. S. A., Saadi, S. A., Albalushi, W., & Albalushi, S. O. (2024). The effectiveness of the academic support tool (ChatGPT) on stimulating learning for A’Sharqiyah University students in the Sultanate of Oman from their point of view. The International Journal for Talent Development, 14(2), 119–141. https://doi.org/10.20428/ijtd.v14i2.2358
  92. Mohamed, A. M. (2023). Exploring the potential of an AI-based Chatbot (ChatGPT) in enhancing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teaching: perceptions of EFL Faculty Members. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11917-z
  93. Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Impact of the implementation of CHATGPT in Education: A Systematic review. Computers, 12(8), 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12080153
  94. Muñoz, S. A. S., Gayoso, G. G., Huambo, A. C., Tapia, R. D. C., Incaluque, J. L., Aguila, O. E. P., Arias-Gonzáles, J. L. (2023). Examining the Impacts of ChatGPT on Student Motivation and Engagement. Social Space, 23(1), 1-27.
  95. Muola, J. M. (2010). A Study of the Relationship between Academic Achievement Motivation and Home Environment among Standard Eight Pupils. Educational Research and Reviews, 5(5), 213-217.
  96. Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
  97. Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318
  98. Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2018). Factors that influence behavioral intention to use mobile‐based assessment: A STEM teachers’ perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12609
  99. Nilson, Linda (2003). Teaching at its best: A Research-Based Resource for College Instructors, 2nd edition, Anker Publishing, pages 41-44.
  100. Olive, K., Tang, X., Loukomies, A., Juuti, K., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2022). Gendered difference in motivational profiles, achievement, and STEM aspiration of elementary school students. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954325
  101. OpenAI. (2022). About. https://openai.com/about/
  102. OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 is OpenAI’s most advanced system, producing safer and more useful responses. https://openai. com/product/gpt-4
  103. Pan, M., & Hsu, W. (2024). Examining students’ tripartite efficacy beliefs in physical education through a teaching personal and social responsibility intervention. The Journal of Educational Research, 117(2), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2024.2329585
  104. Peng, H., Ma, S., & Spector, J. M. (2019). Personalized adaptive learning: an emerging pedagogical approach enabled by a smart learning environment. Smart Learning Environments, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0089-y
  105. Pomerantz, E. M., Moorman, E. A., & Litwack, S. D. (2007). The how, whom, and why of parents’ involvement in children’s academic lives: More is not always better. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 373–410. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430305567
  106. Pritchard, A. (2017). Ways of learning: Learning theories for the classroom. Routledge.
  107. Qadir, J. (2023). Engineering Education in the Era of ChatGPT: Promise and Pitfalls of Generative AI for Education. 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1109/educon54358.2023.10125121
  108. Qiu, J. (2019). A preliminary study of English mobile learning model based on constructivism. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(9), 1167-1172. http://dx.doi. org/10.17507/tpls.0909.13
  109. Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2021). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494 820.2021.1884886       
  110. Rahayu, D. R., Yulianti, Y., Fadillah, A. E., Lestari, E., Faradila, F., & Fitriana, D. (2023). PERAN ORANG TUA DALAM PENDIDIKAN ANAK. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:254869822
  111. Rahman, M. M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for Education and Research: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5783. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095783
  112. Rajeswari, P., & Madhusudan, J. V. (2022). A Systematic Review on Effect of Artificial Intelligence and Augmented Reality on Students’ Academic Performance and Motivation. In The Proceedings of The 4th International Conference On Virtual Reality (Vol. 15, p. 135).
  113. Ran, H., Kim, N., & Secada, W. G. (2021). A meta‐analysis on the effects of technology’s functions and roles on students’ mathematics achievement in K‐12 classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 258–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12611
  114. Rawat, S., Mittal, S., Nehra, D., Sharma, C., & Kamboj, D. (2023). Exploring the Potential of ChatGPT to improve experiential learning in Education. https://doi.org/10.1145/3647444.3647910
  115. Ray, P. P. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-physical Systems, 3, 121–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003
  116. Raza, H., Furqan, M., & Ilham, R. N. (2022). The effect of accounting study club and online-based mentoring on student academic achievement with motivation as an intervening variable: An analysis of accounting student behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(8), 3554-3569. https://doi.org/10.54088/jpsp.v6n8.10454
  117. Rogers, M. A., Wiener, J., Marton, I., & Tannock, R. (2009). Parental involvement in children’s learning: Comparing parents of children with and without Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Journal of School Psychology, 47(3), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2009.02.001
  118. Rubas, J. B. (2023). College academic performance in science-related programs and senior high school strands: A basis for higher education admission policy. Education Mind. https://doi.org/10.58583/pedapub.em2303
  119. Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). War of the chatbots: Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Ernie and beyond. The new AI gold rush and its impact on higher education. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1). Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.23
  120. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  121. Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). When rewards compete with nature: The understanding of intrinsic motivation and self reulation.pp14-54.
  122. Sandu, R., Gide, E., & Elkhodr, M. (2024). The role and impact of ChatGPT in educational practices: insights from an Australian higher education case study. Discover Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00126-6
  123. Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3&4), 299-323.
  124. Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories an educational perspective. Pearson Education.
  125. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
  126. Silitonga, L. M., Hawanti, S., Aziez, F., Furqon, M., Zain, D. S. M., Anjarani, S., & Wu, T. (2023). The impact of AI Chatbot-Based Learning on Students’ motivation in English Writing classroom. In Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 542–549). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40113-8_53
  127. Sison, M., Galvez, R., & Coronel, J. M. D. (2017). Assessing the learning styles of senior high school students of La Consolacion University Philippines: Implications in the teaching-learning process. International Journal of Education and Research, 5(12), 45-52.
  128. Skavronskaya, L., Hadinejad, A., & Cotterell, D. (2023). Reversing the threat of artificial intelligence to opportunity: A discussion of ChatGPT in tourism education. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15313220.2023.2196658
  129. Svinicki, M. D., & Vogler, J. S. (2012). Motivation and learning: Modern theories. Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, 2336-2339.
  130. Taecharungroj, V. (2023). “What can ChatGPT do?” analyzing early reactions to the innovative AI chatbot on Twitter. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7010035
  131. Tanvir, K., Islam, M., Sezan, S. B. K., Sanad, Z. A., & Ataur, A. I. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on Academic Performance among Bangladeshi Undergraduate Students. International Journal of Research in Science & Engineering, 35, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.55529/ijrise.35.18.28
  132. The future of learning: AI is revolutionizing education 4.0. (2024, September 12). World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2024/04/future-learning-ai-revolutionizing-education-4-0/
  133. Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S. V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., Monés, A. M., & Ioannou, A. (2022). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools’ digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 6695–6726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8
  134. United States. Office of Educational Technology. Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning: Insights and Recommendations, report, May 2023; Washington D.C.. (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc2114121/: accessed September 15, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
  135. Vallerand, R. J., Blanchard, C., Mageau, G. A., Koestner, R., Ratelle, C., Leonard, M., Gagne, M., & Marsolais, J. (2003). Les passions de l’âme: On obsessive and harmonious passion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 756–767. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.756
  136. Van Der Sluis, S., Vinkhuyzen, A. a. E., Boomsma, D. I., & Posthuma, D. (2010). Sex differences in adults’ motivation to achieve. Intelligence, 38(4), 433–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.04.004
  137. Virtudazo, J. M. (2023). Determinants of Senior High School tracks and strands Inclination of Grade 10 students of Buenavista II. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(3), 893–906. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v2i3.3109
  138. Vogels, E. A. (2021). Some digital divides persist between rural, urban and suburban America. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/08/19/some-digital-divides-persist-between-rural-urban-andsuburban-america/
  139. Vu, T., Magis-Weinberg, L., Jansen, B. R. J., Van Atteveldt, N., Janssen, T. W. P., Lee, N. C., Van Der Maas, H. L. J., Raijmakers, M. E. J., Sachisthal, M. S. M., & Meeter, M. (2021). Motivation-Achievement Cycles in Learning: a Literature Review and Research Agenda. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 39–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09616-7
  140. Wardat, Y., Tashtoush, M. A., AlAli, R., & Jarrah, A. M. (2023). ChatGPT: A revolutionary tool for teaching and learning mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 19(7), em2286. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13272
  141. Weldy, T. G., & Turnipseed, D. L. (2010). Assessing and Improving learning in Business Schools: Direct and Indirect Measures of learning. Journal of Education for Business, 85(5), 268–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320903449535
  142. Wild, T. C., Enzle, M. E., Nix, G., & Deci, E. L. (1997). Perceiving others as intrinsically or extrinsically motivated: effects on expectancy formation and task engagement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(8), 837–848. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297238005
  143. Xu, J. (2011). Predicting students’ homework environment management at the secondary school level. Educational Psychology, 32(2), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2011.635639
  144. Yang, T. C., Hwang, G. J., & Yang, S. J. H. (2013). Development of an adaptive learning system with multiple perspectives based on students’ learning styles and cognitive styles. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 185-200.
  145. Yildiz, T. A. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on language Learners’ motivation. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, 5(2), 582–597. https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1314355
  146. Yu, Z., & Deng, X. (2022). A Meta-Analysis of gender differences in e-Learners’ Self-Efficacy, satisfaction, motivation, attitude, and performance across the world. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.897327
  147. Yunus, M. M., & Abdullah, N. R. K. R. B. (2011). Motivation and attitudes for learning English among year six students in primary rural school. Procedia: Social & Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2631–2636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.160
  148. Zheng, S., Huang, J., & Chang, K. C. (2024).  Why does ChatGPT fall short in providing truthful answers? (n.d.). Ar5iv. https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/2304.10513
  149. Zou, H., Yao, J., Zhang, Y., & Huang, X. (2023). The influence of teachers’ intrinsic motivation on students’ intrinsic motivation: The mediating role of teachers’ motivating style and teacher‐student relationships. Psychology in the Schools, 61(1), 272–286. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23050

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic