Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 34 no. 2 (2025)

Spill the Tea: A Conversation Analysis of the Ogie Diaz Showbiz Update Talk Show

Jasmin Andrea Pacalna | Harry Dave B. Villasor

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study examined the communication strategies employed in the Ogie Diaz Showbiz Update talk show, focusing on their role in shaping conversational dynamics and audience engagement. Using conversation analysis, 30 widely viewed episodes were analyzed to identify key strategies such as turn-taking, topic nomination, interruptions, repair mechanisms, and politeness strategies. The study aimed to determine how these strategies influenced the flow of discourse and contributed to the overall coherence of conversations within the talk show format. Findings revealed that the host, Ogie Diaz, skillfully utilized humor, repetition, and direct audience engagement to sustain fluid discussions. His approach helped maintain viewer interest and guided interactions effectively. Meanwhile, the guests employed elaboration, clarification techniques, and politeness strategies to navigate exchanges, ensuring smooth and cooperative dialogue. The study also observed that interruptions and overlaps introduced spontaneity into conversations, but excessive use sometimes led to disruptions and conversational breakdowns. Repair mechanisms, such as rephrasing and self-correction, played a crucial role in maintaining clarity, managing misunderstandings, and reinforcing the credibility of statements. Additionally, strategic pauses and silence were used to highlight important points, regulate the pacing of discussions, and create dramatic effects for the audience. This research emphasizes the significance of effective communication strategies in media discourse, particularly in Philippine talk shows. The findings provide valuable insights for educators, media practitioners, and students in improving communication skills, enriching critical engagement with media, and understanding the dynamics of structured dialogue in public conversations. Ultimately, this study contributes to the broader discourse on conversational strategies and their impact on audience perception.



References:

  1. Abbas, N. F. (2020). Pragmatics of Overlapping Talks in Therapy Sessions. DOI: 10.17263/jlls.803705. Ajileye, M. O., Dozie, C. P., & Ekwuribe, C. F. (2023). Turns, Turn-Taking, and or Interruptions! A Pragmatic Approach to Discourse. Retrieved from https://www.ijsre.com.ng/assets/vol.%2C-16(4)-chinomso-patricia-dozie-et-al.pdf.
  2. Al-Mutairi, S. (2020). Pauses and their functions in Arabic talk shows: An analysis of conversational patterns. Journal of Arabic Linguistics, 14(1), 45-60.
  3. Alafnan, M. A. & Rudio, L. D. (2023). Student-Teacher Email Requests: Comparative Analysis of Politeness Strategies Used by Malaysian and Filipino University Students. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n1p353.
  4. Albert, S. & de Ruiter, J. P. (2018). Repair: The Interface Between Interaction and Cognition. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12339.
  5. Alghamdi, E. (2024). System and User Strategies to Repair Conversational Breakdowns of Spoken Dialogue Systems: A Scoping Review. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1145/3640794.3665558.
  6. Almakrob, A. Y. (2020). Culture-Specific Aspects of Turn-taking: An Analysis of Conversations in a Saudi Context. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3621264.
  7. Amalia, D. R., Mulyono, H., & Suryoputro, G. (2019). Politeness strategies in WhatsApp communication between EFL teachers and students: An analysis based on Brown and Levinson’s framework. Journal of Language and Communication Studies. Retrieved https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1226910.pdf.
  8. Ambalegin. & Safitri , V. (2019). The Types Of Politeness Strategy In “17 Again” Movie Script: Pragmatic Approach. Retrieved from https://ejournal.upbatam.ac.id.
  9. Amin, M. E., et. al. (2020). Evaluating the quality of research in health: A framework for qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 30(4), 1-15. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1136%2Fbmj.320.7226.50.
  10. Angeli, G., et. al. (2019). Mimic and Rephrase: Reflective Listening in Open-Ended Dialogue. Retrieved from https://aclanthology.org/K19-1037.pdf.
  11. Araneta, J. E., et. al. (2023). Politeness Strategies of Manobo Students in a Classroom in Kidapawan City, Philippines. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.53899/spjrd.v28i2.247.
  12. Bannard, C., et. al. (2024). Conversational topic maintenance and related cognitive abilities in autistic versus neurotypical children. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613241286610.
  13. Bao, D. (2020). Exploring How Silence Communicates. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1265815.
  14. Bazile-Dutes, A. (2022). 12 Famous People Who Were Disrespected on Late-Night Talk Shows and Made      my Jaw            Literally Drop. Retrieved from https://www.buzzfeed.com/ajanibazile/inappropriate-late-night-host-interviews.
  15. Bearis, B. J. I., et. al. (2023). Turn-Taking Features in Toni Talks. Retrieved from https://typeset.io/pdf/turn-taking-features-in-toni-talks-a-conversation-analysis-2mumdpmo.pdf.
  16. Boland, F. K. et. al. (2023). A Practical Guide to Conversation Research: How to Study What People Say to Each Other. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231183919.
  17. Bordey, H. (2024). Sharon Cuneta, Kiko Pangilinan File Cyber Libel Case vs. Cristy Fermin. Retrieved from https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/showbiz/chikaminute/906353/sharon-cuneta-kiko-pangilinan-files-cyber-libel-case-vs-cristy-fermin/story/.
  18. Brannan, G. D., Brannan, J. M., & Tenny, S. (2022). Qualitative Study. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470395/.
  19. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. DOI:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  20. Bunce, A., Guest, G., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82.
  21. Canagarajah, S. & Matsumoto, Y. (2020). The use of gesture, gesture hold, and gaze in trouble-in-talk among multilingual interlocutors in an English as a lingua franca context. Retrieved https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.08.015.
  22. Carnay, O. (2022). “OGIE DIAZ SHOWBIZ UPDATE” youtube channel wins “2022 Most Influential Online Entertainment Program;”. Retrieved from http://hollywoodflip.com/ogie-diaz-showbiz-update
  23. Carter, S. (2018). Managing conversational rhythm: The use of pauses and silence in American talk shows. Television & New Media, 19(4), 357-374.
  24. Cimenli, B., Jenks, C., & Sert, O. (2022). Topic maintenance in video-mediated virtual exchanges: Rolling the ball back in L2 interactions. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102834.
  25. Cogo, A. & Ting, S. P. (2022). Repetition and Rephrasing in English as a Lingua Franca Medical Consultations in  Hong Kong. Retrieved from https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/30471/3/TING&COGO_draft_chapter_V3.pdf.
  26. Compton, K. (2021). “He’s Going to Ask What He Wants”: Male Talk Show Hosts and Sexism. Retrieved from https://www.thelexingtonline.com/blog/2021/3/10/
  27. Cotton, E. (2023). Here are Nine of the Most Controversial and Problematic British TV Shows that would        Never get Aired Today. Retrieved from https://www.buzzfeed.com/elizabeth_cotton/problematic-british-tv-shows-uk.
  28. Cruz, M., & Reyes, L. (2021). Interactive topic management in Filipino online talk shows: A study of live audience engagement. Journal of Asian Media and Communication, 19(3), 45-61.
  29. Culling, J. F. & Hadley, L. V. (2022). Timing of head turns to upcoming talkers in triadic conversation: Evidence for prediction of turn ends and interruptions. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1061582.
  30. Cushion, S., et. al. (2022). Questioning Fact-Checking in the Fight Against Disinformation: An Audience Perspective. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2022.2097118.
  31. De Guzman, A. (2022). Sensationalism and Stereotyping in Philippine Talk Shows: A Critical Analysis. Philippine Journal of Media Studies, 15(2), 234-249.
  32. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  33. Dippold, D. (2023). “Can I have the scan on Tuesday?” User repair in interaction with a task-oriented chatbot and the question of communication skills for AI. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.12.004.
  34. Emrani, F. (2019). A Conversation Analysis of Self-Initiated Self-Repair Structures in Advanced Iranian EFL Learners. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED591531.pdf.
  35. Eslami, Z., & Ranjbar, M. (2021). The Role of Imagery in Enhancing Conversational Engagement. Journal of Language and Communication Studies, 12(3), 45-60.
  36. France-Presse, A. (2023). How a Foul-Mouthed South Korean Radio Host Tursconed his Show into a Youtube   Hit        after being       Silenced. Retrieved from https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/east-asia/article/3211360/how-foul-mouthed-south-korean-radio-host-turned-his-show-youtube-hit-after-being-silenced?campaign=3211360&module=perpetu al_scroll_0&pgtype=article.
  37. Gelaga, J. S. (2023). Turn-Taking Strategies of Secretary Harry Roque as a Presidential Spokesperson: A Conversation Analysis. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.56648/aide-irj.v5i1.89.
  38. Giangola, J. (2019). You Can Say That Again: The Role of Repetition in Conversation Design. Retrieved from https://medium.com/google-design/you-can-say-that-again-the-role-of-repetition-in-conversation-design-55937ef0f0ba.
  39. GMA Integrated News. (2024). Ogie Diaz on Cyberlibel Case Filed by Bea Alonzo: “Sila pa rin ang gusto        naming            magkatuluyan”. Retrieved from https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/showbiz/chikaminute/905576/ogie-diaz-on-cyberlibel-case-fi led-by-bea-alonzo-sila-pa-rin-ang-gusto-naming-magkatuluyan/story/.
  40. Gonzales, G. (2021). Collective Anger: People Speak Up on Toni Gonzaga-BBM Interview. Retrieved from https://www.rappler.com/technology/features/toni-gonzaga-bongbong-marcos-interview-reaction s-facebook-twitter-websites/.
  41. Grin, A. (2022). Bald on Record: How to Analyze Politeness. Retrieved from https://studybay.com/blog/the-bald-on-record-strategy.
  42. Hanh, N. T. M. & Hoa, N. T. Q. (2019). Repair Strategies in English Conversations and their Application in Teaching English Interaction Skill to B2 Level Learners. Retrieved from https://www.vnseameo.org/TESOLConference2016/materials/1_1.pdf.
  43. Hoey, E. M. & Kendrick, K. H. (2018). Conversation Analysis. Retrieved from https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_2328034_7/component/file_2328033/content.
  44. Hsieh, S. C. (2018). Political Talk Shows in Taiwan: First and Third Person Effects, Their Attitudinal Antecedents        and Consequences. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8367&context=etd.
  45. Itzkoff, D. (2019). Sara Gilbert Balances Her Lives on ‘The Conners’ and ‘The Talk’. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/14/arts/television/sara-gilbert-the-conners-the-talk.html.
  46. Jacobson, C. (2019). Talk Shows as the Way to Control People, But not just Entertainment. Retrieved from https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/talk-shows-just-entertainment-or-the-way-to-control
  47. Jing, Z. (2024). Will Taiwan Shut Down a Talk Show over a Discriminatory Comment? Retrieved from https://www.rfa.org/english/news/afcl/fact-check-taiwan-call-show-02052024152053.html.
  48. Lee, A., & Mohd, R. (2022). Repetition and Persuasion in Malaysian Political Speeches. Journal of Southeast Asian Media Studies, 14(1), 89-104.
  49. Lee, J. (2023). The Influence of Talk Shows on Perception: A Study of Media Impact on Students and Educators. Journal of Media Literacy, 29(3), 112-125. Retrieved from www.journalofmedialiteracy.com/talk-show-perception.
  50. Li, X., & Zhao, L. (2020). Managing topics in Chinese online talk shows: Strategies and challenges in the digital age. In M. Tan & A. Lee (Eds.), Chinese Media Dynamics (pp. 76-92). Springer.
  51. Liu, Y. (2019). Conversational interruptions and overlaps in Chinese talk shows: Cultural and communicative implications. Asian Communication Research, 16(4), 234-250.
  52. Llorica, M. M. & Sosas, R. V. (2022). Politeness Strategies Of Filipino Teenagers In The Household. Retrieved from https://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/5200.
  53. Mason, M. (2010). Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews. Qualitative Social Research, 11(3). Retrieved from https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1428
  54. McLean, S. (2024). Conversational Interruptions vs. Overlaps: Learning to Recognize the Difference to Promote Team Creativity. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/conversational-interruptions-vs-overlaps-learning-recognize-mcl ean-dxrwc/.
  55. McLeod, S. (2024). How to Conduct Conversation Analysis: Guide & Examples. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35524.23688.
  56. Merriam-Webster. (2023). Let’s Talk Tea. Retrieved       from https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/tea-slang-meaning-origin.
  57. Misaka, G. T. (2023). Repair Practices by Japanese Third-Age Learners in Communicative Lessons Online. Retrieved from https://www.hpu.edu/research-publications/tesol-working-papers/2023/3_gabriel_misaka.pdf.
  58. Nowell, L. S., et. al. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-13. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847.
  59. Ratanakul, P. (2019). Managing topics in Thai media talk shows: Cultural and interactional strategies. InC. Ho & Y. Xie (Eds.), Asian Media Studies (pp. 147-163). Routledge.
  60. Reyes, F. (2020). Managing discourse in Philippine talk shows: Patterns of interruptions and overlaps. Philippine Journal of Media Studies, 21(2), 99-115.
  61. Reyes, J. M. (2019). Silence and turn-taking in Filipino talk shows: An exploration of pauses and conversational management. Philippine Journal of Communication Studies, 18(2), 112-129.
  62. Reyes, L. (2023). Sensationalism and Repetition in Philippine Media Talk Shows: A Critical Examination. Philippine Media Review, 22(4), 310-325.
  63. Santos, M. A. (2021). Managing conversational lapses: Repair strategies in Philippine talk shows. Philippine Journal of Communication Studies, 19(3), 134-150.
  64. Sato, K. (2022). Controversial Comments on LGBTQ+ Individuals Spark Protests in Japan. Tokyo Times. Retrieved from www.tokyotimes.com/controversial-comments-lgbtq.
  65. Scott,                     H.        (2023). Critical Discourse        Analysis.          Retrieved      from https://www.sesync.org/resources/critical-discourse-analysis-visual-approach.
  66. Shank, C. (2020). A Brief Overview of Conversational Repair. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341435052_A_brief_overview_of_conversational_repa ir.
  67. Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education           for Information, 22(2), 63-75. Retrieved from https://www.pm.lth.se/fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/Shenton_Trustworthiness.pdf.
  68. Skantze, G. (2021). Turn-taking in Conversational Systems and Human-Robot Interaction: A Review. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2020.101178.
  69. Smith, J., & Davidson, R. (2020). Repetition as a Discourse Strategy: Emphasizing and Reinforcing Key Messages. Journal of Communication Research, 18(2), 55-70.
  70. Sosas, R. (2022). Politeness Strategies Of Filipino Teenagers In The Household. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369184792_Politeness_Strategies_Of_Filipino_Teenag ers_In_The_Household.
  71. Statistics Solutions. (2021). What is Transferability in Qualitative Research?. Retrieved from https://www.statisticssolutions.com/what-is-transferability-in-qualitative-research/.
  72. Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618987.
  73. Vranjes, J. (2021). A Multi-Modal Analysis of Turn-Taking in Interpreter-Mediated Psychotherapy. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.113201.2021.a06.
  74. Wang, N. (2022). How Ogie Diaz keeps up with local entertainment’s changing landscape. Retrieved from https://manilastandard.net/?p=314281659.
  75. Wang, S. (2020). The Impact of Video Length on User Engagement and Content Analysis. Journal of Media Studies, 35(2), 123-136.
  76. Wulandari, P., & Suhartono, H. (2021). The Role of Repetition in Indonesian Political Discourse. Asian Journal of Political Science, 29(3), 112-127.
  77. xPolit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2014). Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice. Wolters Kluwer Health. Retrieved from https://cmc.marmot.org/Record/.b4209138x.
  78. Zhang, Y., & Hu, Q. (2020). Emotional Impact and Perception of Imagery in Dialogue. Discourse Studies, 22(1), 78-94.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic