Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 34 no. 8 (2025)

Evaluating the Nexus: Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge and its Significance on Students’ Science Process Skills

Rebo Salvalosa | Christine P. Abo

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

One of the methods of teaching science crucial for developing scientific skills is the development of Science process skills. This study aimed to evaluate the nexus of teachers' pedagogical content knowledge and significance on the Science process skills of the Junior High School students. A descriptive and correlational method was used. The respondents involved were three hundred thirty-one (331) students and thirteen (13) Science teachers. The data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, Pearson r, t-test, and regression analysis. The findings reveal that Science teachers possess basic proficiency in content knowledge (M = 0.65, SD = 0.44) but excel in pedagogical knowledge (M = 4.88, SD = 0.08), classroom management (M = 4.96, SD = 0.04), and teaching strategies (M = 4.78, SD = 0.12). Their curricular expertise is extensive (M = 4.16, SD = 0.16). In contrast, students demonstrate a beginning proficiency level in basic Science process skills (M = 0.36, SD = 0.37), indicating a low foundation in applying scientific knowledge to learn concepts. However, students exhibit minimal proficiency in integrated Science process skills (M = 0.51, SD = 0.50), enabling them to understand lessons, engage in direct reasoning, and accurately interpret scientific inquiry. A significant correlation is found between Science teachers' high-quality traits in teaching strategies and students' basic Science process skills (r = 0.620, p < 0.05). The study concludes that Science teachers' basic proficiency level implies an understanding of scientific concepts and exceptional capacity to improve teaching practice through effective use of the 5Es (Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, and Evaluate). The findings highlight the importance of Science teachers' pedagogical knowledge and classroom strategies in developing students' basic and integrated Science process skills, emphasizing the need for targeted professional development to enhance teachers' content knowledge and pedagogical expertise.



References:

  1. Aktamis, H. & Ergin, O. (2018). The impact of instructional methods on students’ independent thinking and scientific process skills. International Journal of Science Education, 40(3), 345-362
  2. Alam, A., & Mohanty, A. (2023). Learning on the move: A pedagogical framework for state-of-the-art mobile learning. In Data Management, Analytics, and Innovation (pp. 735–748). Springer.
  3. Alatas, S., & Fachrunisa, R. (2018). Enhancing students’ scientific investigations through the development of science process skills. International Journal of Science and Education, 34(5), 267-284.
  4. Aman, V. (2020). Transfer of knowledge through international scientific mobility: Introduction of a network-based bibliometric approach to study different knowledge types. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(2), 565-581.
  5. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education. 8th edition. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
  6. Azam, M. (2019). Challenges in teaching abstract concepts in K-12 science curricula: Focus on force and motion. Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 123-135.
  7. Batisla-Ong, F. (2021). Enhancing students’ cognitive engagement through the scientific method: Implications for teaching process skills. Journal of Science Education Research, 5(2), 45-58.
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  9. Derilo, R. C. (2019). Basic and integrated science process skills acquisition and science achievement of seventh-grade learners. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(1), 281-293.
  10. Doyle, H., Smith, L., Brown, T., & Clarke, R. (2020). Exploring the impact of teaching experience on instructional strategies. Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 189-205.
  11. Fulden-Guler, F. (2021). Pre-service science teachers’ perceptions of pedagogical content knowledge. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 345-362.
  12. Garcia, L. R., & Garcia, M. D. (2023). The Science Performance of Filipino High School Students: An Analysis of Contributing Factors. Philippine Journal of Science Education, 15(2), 112-128.
  13. Gizaw, G., & Sota, S. (2023). Improving science process skills of students: A review of literature. Science Education International, 34(3), 216-224.
  14. Hodges, G. W., Tippins, D., & Oliver, J. S. (2015). A study of highly qualified science teachers’ career trajectory in the deep, rural south: Examining a link between deprofessionalization and teacher dissatisfaction. School Science and Mathematics, 113(6), 263-274.
  15. Inaya, E., Suparmi, A., Sarwanto, S., & Ashadi, A. (2020). The correlation between science process skills and science achievement in physics learning. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 14(1), 104–111.
  16. Irwanto, Rohaeti, E., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (2018). Undergraduate students’ science process skills in terms of some variables: A perspective from Indonesia. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(5), 751-764.
  17. Jardinico III, E. C., & Linaugo, J. D. (2023). Acquired basic and integrated science process skills and academic performance in Earth Science of Grade 11 students in a Philippine public high school. Philippine Social Science Journal, 6(1), 63-73.
  18. Juhji, J., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2020). Interaction between scientific attitudes and science process skills toward technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 1-16.
  19. Juhji. (2016). Developing science process skills in secondary education: A focus on inquiry-based learning. Journal of Science Education Research, 28(3), 145-162.
  20. Kim, H. (2018). Development and validation of a test of integrated science process skills for the further education and training learners. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Pretoria, South Africa.
  21. Kruea-In, C., Kruea-In, N., & Fakcharoenphol, W. (2015). A study of Thai in-service and pre-service science teachers’ understanding of science process skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 993-997.
  22. Kurniawan, W., Pathoni, H., Muliawati, L., Kurniawan, D. A., Romadona, D. D., Ningsi, A. P., & Dari, R. W. (2020). Relationship of science process skills and critical thinking of students in physics subject. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5581-5588.
  23. Kusuma, A. E., & Rusmansyah. (2020). Analysis of science process skills for senior high school students in Banjarmasin. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET 2019) (pp. 23-26). Atlantis Press.
  24. Makarwi, T. (2015). Enhancing science education through the development of process skills. International Journal of Science Education, 30(4), 212-228.
  25. Malipot, M. (2023, December 7). 2022 PISA results a ‘clear indication’ that PH education system is in ‘worst state’. Manila Bulletin.
  26. Ogunkola, B. J. (2016). Science education and teacher effectiveness: Challenges and strategies for improvement. Science Education Journal, 45(2), 123-135.
  27. Olvido MMJ, Dayagbil FT, Alda RC, Uytico BJ and Rodriguez KFR (2024). An exploration of the quality of graduates of Philippine teacher education institutions. Front. Educ. 9:1235261.
  28. Paring, I. R. B., Cereno, A. C. C., & Decano, R. S. (2021). Determining factors to students’ science achievement in the implementation of K to 12 spiral progression approach: a mixed method. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 6(1), 46–54.
  29. Robinson, M. (2017). Overcoming barriers in science education: Building teacher confidence through professional development. Educational Research Journal, 32(4), 210-225.
  30. Salz, S., & Figueroa, D. T. (2019). Take the Test: Sample Questions from OECD’s PISA Assessments. OECD Publishing.
  31. Santos, J. F., Dela Cruz, P. L., & Reyes, C. M. (2022). Assessing Science Proficiency Among Filipino Learners: Bridging Gaps Through Targeted Instruction. Asian Science Education Journal, 18(3), 79-95.
  32. Saputro, S. (2019). Enhancing students’ scientific process skills and manipulative abilities through effective learning strategies. Journal of Science Education Research, 5(2), 123-135.
  33. Servallos, N.J. (2023, December 7). PISA: Philippines 5 to 6 years behind. The Philippine Star.
  34. Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Understanding descriptive research designs and methods. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 34(1), 8-12.
  35. Sodervik, I., Makinen, J., & Lonka, K. (2014). The role of prior knowledge and conceptions in learning science among pre-service teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(2), 160-173.
  36. Suharta, I. G. P., & Parwati, N. N. (2020). Relationship between teacher’s content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, and self-efficacy and its impact on student’s mathematics learning achievement. In Proceedings of the 4th Asian Education Symposium (AES 2019) (pp. 293–296). Atlantis Press.
  37. Temiz, B. K. (2020). Assessing skills of identifying variables and formulating hypotheses using different methods. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(1), 1–17.
  38. Tretter, T. R., Brown, S. L., Bush, W. S., Saderholm, J. C., & Holmes, V. (2013). Valid and reliable science content assessments for science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(2), 269-295.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic