HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 25 no. 6 (2024)

School Heads Transformational Leadership Practices, Teachers’ Morale, and Performance

Omerah Mindalano Barangai

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The purpose of this study is to determine the school heads transformational leadership practices, teachers’ morale, and performance. Survey data were gathered from 10 school heads and 150 teachers from public elementary schools of Division of Lanao del Sur. The findings revealed that both the teachers and school heads respondents rated “high” the leadership practices of the school heads, in terms of transformational leadership practices. However, they tend to show high morale when it comes to teacher Rapport with the school head, satisfaction with teaching, rapport among teachers, teacher salary, teacher status, and it shows very high in terms of curriculum issues. Moreover, the result of the Performance Appraisal System for Teachers (PAST) revealed that most teachers’ respondents have very high satisfactory performance measured in terms of instructional competence, professional and personal characteristics, punctuality and attendance. However, variables, namely moral satisfaction, teachers’ transformational leadership, and school heads’ transformational leadership, have no direct association with their PAST. Based on the finding, this study concludes that the elementary school teachers’ Performance appraisal has a significant relationship to the teachers’ transformational leadership assessment and teachers’ morale satisfaction in contrast, it has no significant relationship to school heads transformational leadership. Teachers’ morale satisfaction is the best predictor of teachers’ performance, which implies that once teachers are satisfied with their personal and professional engagement in the school, their performance would be better.



References:

  1. Abu-Tineh, A. (2003). Exploring the relationship between the perceived leadership style of principals and their teacher’s practice of the five disciplines of learning schools.
  2. Avolio, B. J., & Locke, E. E. (2002). Contrasting different philosophies of leader motivation—Altruism versus egoism. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(2), 169-191.
  3. Avolio, B. J., (2007). Promoting More Integrative Strategies of Leadership Theory-Building.
  4. Avolio, B. J., Bass, B, M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(4), 441-462.
  5. Avolio, B. J., Zhu, W., Koh, W., & Bhatia, P. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(8), 951-968.
  6. Barnett, K. & McCormick, J. (2004). Leadership and Individual Principal – Teacher Relationships in School.
  7. Barnett, K., McCormick, J., & Conners, R. (2001). Transformational leadership in schools—panacea, placebo or problem? Journal of Educational Administration, 39 (1), 24-46.
  8. Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (Eds) (1994). Improving Organizational Effectiveness Through Transformational Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  9. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: The Free Press.
  10. Bass, B. M. (1990). Concepts of leadership. In B.M. Bass & R. M. Stogdill (Eds.) Handbook of Leadership: Theory, research, & managerial applications (3rd ed.), 1212. New Ethics and Integrity in Leadership style 114.
  11. Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18 (3), 19-31.
  12. Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19-31.
  13. Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational Leadership: Industrial, Military and Educational Impact. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  14. Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industry, military, and educational impact. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  15. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. California: Sage Publications.
  16. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. (1994). Transformational Leadership: Improving Organizational Effectiveness, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
  17. Bently, R., & Rompel, A. (1980). Manual for the Purdue teacher Opinionaire. West Lafayette, IN: University Book Store.
  18. Blanchard, K.H. (2007). Leading at a Higher Level. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  19. Boss, J. L. (Ed.). (1997). Teaching well and liking it: Motivating faculty to teach effectively. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  20. Brouer, R.L., Douglas, C., Treadway, D.C. and Ferris, G.R. (2013). Leader political skill, relationship quality, and leadership effectiveness: A two-study model test and constructive replication. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(2), 185-198.
  21. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
  22. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
  23. Cai, Y., & Lin, C. (2006). Theory and Practice on Teacher Performance Evaluation. Frontiers of Education in China, 1, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-005-0004-x
  24. Cizek, G. C. (1999). Handbook of educational policy. Academic Press: San Diego.
  25. Clough, D. B. (1989). Yes, we can improve staff morale. Address at the 51st annual Conference of the American Association of School Personnel Administrators. Cleveland, Ohio.
  26. Coad, F. C., & Berry, A. J. (1998). Transformational leadership and learning organization. Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 19(3), 164-172.
  27. Covington, M.V. (2000). Goal Theory, Motivation, and School Achievement: An Integrating Review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 171-200.
  28. Day, D. V. (2000). Leadership development: A review in context. Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 581-613.
  29. Ellenburg, F. C. (1972). Factors affecting teacher morale, NASSP Bulletin, 56, 76-87.
  30. Espejo, R., Schuhmann, W., Schwaninger, M., & Bilello, U. (1996). Organizational transformation and learning: A cybernetic approach to management. New York: Wiley.
  31. Evans, L. (1997). Understanding teacher morale and job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 831-845.
  32. Evans, L. (1998). Teacher morale, job satisfaction, and motivation. London, England: Paul Chapman.
  33. Fisher, B. A. (1974). Small Group Decision-making: Communication & The Group Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  34. Fisher, D. (2005). The Missing Link: Standards, Assessment and Instruction. Voice from the Middle.
  35. Flores, M. (2004). The Impact of School Culture and Leadership on New Teachers; Learning in the Workplace. International Journal of Leadership in Education.
  36. Frances Anne, F., & Lora J., L. (n.d.). Maslow's hierarchy of needs and student academic success. Teaching And Learning in Nursing. 6-13. Available from: ScienceDirect, Ipswich, MA. Accessed April 6, 2013.
  37. Fullan, M. G. (1992). Getting reform right: What works and what doesn't. Phi Delta Kappa, 73(10), 744-752.
  38. Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2000). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (6th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  39. Gerhardt, P. L. (2004). Leading theories and practices of employers as it pertains to job satisfaction: Cost-benefit analysis of creating work environments of satisfaction versus employee turnover. A paper presented at Capella University, School of Business and Technology. Minneapolis, MN.
  40. Green, R. (2000). Natural forces: How to significantly increase school performance in the third millennium. Unpublished manuscript.
  41. Hartford, S. C. (2000). Employee perceptions of leader credibility and its relationship to employee communication satisfaction and Health Care Organization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University.
  42. Heller, H., Clay, R., & Perkins, C. (1993). The Relationship Between Teacher Job Satisfaction and Principal Leadership Style. Journal of School Leadership, 3(1), 74-86.
  43. Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. (1969). The Situational Leadership Theory.
  44. Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1969). Life cycle theory of leadership. Training & Development Journal, 23(5), 26-34.
  45. Herzberg, F., Snydermann, B., & Musner, B. (1959). The Motivation to work (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
  46. Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (1987). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). New York: Random House.
  47. Huges, R. L., Ginett, R. G., & Curphy, G. J. (1999). Leadership: Enhancing the Lessons of Experience. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
  48. Johnson, J. R. (2002). Leading the learning organization: Portrait of four leaders. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(5), 241-249.
  49. Johnson, J. R. (2002). Leading the learning organization: Portrait of four leaders. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(5), 241-249.
  50. Johnson, S. (1996). Leading to change: The challenge of the new superintendency. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  51. Keeler, B. T., & Andrews, J. H. (1963). The leader behavior of principals, staff morale, and productivity. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 9, 179-191.
  52. Koerner, T. F. (1990). Developing staff morale. The Practitioner, 16, 4.
  53. Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. J. (2002). Leadership challenge (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  54. Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1995). The leadership challenge: how to keep getting extraordinary things done in organizations. California: Jossey-Bass.
  55. Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1995). The leadership challenge: how to keep getting extraordinary things done in organizations. California: Jossey-Bass.
  56. Lam, Y. L. J. (2002). Defining the effect of transformational leadership on organizational learning: a cross-cultural comparison. School Leadership & Management, 22(4), 439-452.
  57. Leithwood, K. (1996). International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  58. Levine, M. (1986). Excellence in education: Lessons from America’s best-run companies and schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 63, 150-186.
  59. Lipham, J. M., Rankin, R. E., & Hoeh, J. A. (1985). The principalship: Concepts, competencies, and cases. New York: Longman.
  60. Lucas, S., & Valentine, J. (2002). Transformational Leadership: Principals, Leadership Teams, and School Culture. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Research Association, New Orleans, L.A.
  61. Lumsden, L. (1998). Teacher morale. ERIC digests, 120. Retrieved January 9, 2011 from ERIC database on the World Wide Web: http://eric.uoregon.edu/publications/digests/digest120.html
  62. Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. C. (1996). Educational administration: Concepts and Practices. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  63. Madmood, H. (1993). Leadership and School Effectiveness. Kuala Lumpur: DBP.
  64. Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row.
  65. Matthew, J. L., & Crow, G. M. (2010). The Principalship: New Roles in Professional Learning.
  66. McBer, H. (2000). A Model of Teacher Effectiveness. Department for Education and Employment.
  67. McEwan, E. K. (2003). 10 Traits of Highly Effective Principals: From Good to Great Performance. CA: Corwin Press.
  68. Mendel, P. C. (1987). An investigation of factors that influence teacher morale and satisfaction with work conditions. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
  69. Morrison, M., & Rosenthal, A. (1997). Exploring learning organization: Enacting mental models - the power of the Rosenthal stage. Journal of Workplace Learning, 9(4), 124-129.
  70. Napier, T. G. (1966). Teacher morale. Unpublished Ed.D. Dissertation, University of Nebraska Teacher College.
  71. Olsen, B., & Anderson, L. (2004). Courses of Action: A Report on Urban Teacher Career Development. Los Angeles: Retention Report Series, UCLA’s Institute for Democracy, Education and Access.
  72. Parks, D. J. (1983). Leadership in times of austerity. Educational Leadership, 40, 11-13.
  73. Parrish, D. A. (2001). The Impact of leadership behavior on organizational commitment and job autonomy of information services librarians. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University.
  74. Paul, J., Costley, D. L., Howelly, J. P., & Dorfman, P. W. (2002). The mutability of charisma in leadership research. Management Decision, 40(1), 192-200.
  75. Pounder, J. S., & Coleman M. (2002). Women - better leaders than men? In general and educational management it still “all depends.” Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 23(3), 122-133.
  76. Rempel, A. M., & Bently, R. R. (1970). Relationship with selected factors. The Journal of Teacher Education, 21, 534-539.
  77. Senge, P., Cambron–McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2000). Schools that learn. New York: Doubleday.
  78. Seravia-Shore, M. (2008). Diverse teaching strategies for diverse learners. In R. W. Cole (Ed.), Educating everybody’s children: We know what we need to do. (Chapter 2).
  79. Sergiovanni, T. J. (2005). The Virtues of Leadership.
  80. Sivanathan, N., & Fekken, G. C. (2002). Emotional intelligence, moral reasoning and transformational leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(4), 198-204.
  81. Smith, C. S., & Piele, K. P. (2006). School Leadership: Handbook for excellence in student learning. CA: Fourth Edition, Corwin Press.
  82. Stogdill, R. M. (1963). Manual for the leader behavior description questionnaire – form XII; An experimental revision. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
  83. Strachan, P. (1996). Managing transformational change: The learning organization and teamworking. Team Performance Management, 2(2), 2-40.
  84. Suraya, W. H., & Yunus, J. N. (2012). Principal Leadership Style in high Academic Performance of Selected Secondary Schools in Kelantan Darulnaim. International Journal of Independent Research & Studies, (April 2012).
  85. Tatlah, I. A., Quraishi, U., & Hussain, I. (2010). A survey study to find out the relationship between leadership styles and demographic characteristics of elementary and secondary school teacher. Educational Research and Reviews, 5(11), 655-661.
  86. Taylor, T. V. (2002). Examination of leadership practices of principals identified as servant leaders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri – Columbia, MO.
  87. Thompson, G., & Glasø, L. (2015). Situational leadership theory: A test from three perspectives. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 36(5), 527-544.
  88. Thompson, G., & Vecchio, R. P. (2009). Situational leadership theory: A test of three versions. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(5), 837-848.
  89. Tirmizi, S. A. (2002). The 6-L framework: A model for leadership research and development. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(5), 269-279.
  90. Ubben, G. C., Hughes, L. W., & Norris, C. J. (2001). The Principal: Creative leadership for effective schools, Fourth Edition. MA: Pearson Education Company.
  91. Vockell, E. (2001). Educational Psychology: A Practical Approach. Online.
  92. Washington, R., & Watson, H. F. (1976). Positive teacher morale: The principal’s responsibility. NASSP Bulletin, 60, 4-6.
  93. Whitaker, T., Whitaker, B., & Lumpa, D. (2000). Motivating and inspiring teachers: The educational leader’s guide for building staff morale. Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education.
  94. Winter, L., & Butzon, J. (2009). Attribution Theory and School Reform. JEP: Ejournal of Education Policy, 2.
  95. Yu, H., Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2002). The effect of transformational leadership on teachers’ commitment to change in Hong Kong. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(4), 368-389.
  96. Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in organizations. (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall.
  97. Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in Organizations, 7th ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  98. Yukl, G., Gordon, A., & Taber, T. (2002). A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: Integrating a half century of behavior research. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 15-32.