HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 49 no. 8 (2025)

Investigating Content Language and Integrated Learning Among Taiwanese Students: Basis for a Gamified Learning Material

Clyde Peligro

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study examined the effectiveness of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL), a teaching approach that promotes the simultaneous acquisition of content and language proficiency. Fifty-four students participated in a one-group pretest-posttest design. Data collection involved a researcher-made questionnaire to assess content knowledge and an adapted survey using the modified Vocabulary Knowledge Scale (VKS) by Dale Brown to measure receptive vocabulary knowledge. Findings indicated that CLIL effectively enhanced the two target objectives: recognizing vocabulary related to recycling and identifying phrases emphasizing the importance of recycling for the environment. Significant improvements in both content understanding and receptive vocabulary were observed after the intervention. Based on these results, the study recommends developing CLIL-based lesson exemplars enriched with gamified activities to support teachers in effectively implementing the CLIL approach. This highlights the potential of CLIL to achieve integrated learning outcomes, enhancing both content and language proficiency in educational settings. Speaking Proficiency, Content, and Language Integrated Learning, Content Knowledge, Receptive Vocabulary, and Paired Sample T-test.



References:

  1. Bier, A. (2015). An exploration of the link between language and cognition. EL. LE, 4(1), 71-83.
  2. Briggs, J. G., Dearden, J., & Macaro, E. (2018). English medium instruction: Comparing teacher beliefs in secondary and tertiary education. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(3), 673-696.
  3. Brown, D., & University, N. (2008, December). Using a modified version of the Vocabulary Knowledge Scale to aid vocabulary development. Retrieved from JALT Publications.
  4. Coyle, D. (1999). Theory and planning for effective classrooms: Supporting students in content and language integrated learning contexts. London: CILT.
  5. Coyle, D. (2006). Content and Language Integrated Learning Motivating Learners and Teachers. Scottish Languages Review, 1-18.
  6. Coyle, D., & Pladevall, E. (2015, February 23). Reflecting on CLIL innovation. An interview with Do Coyle and Elisabet Pladevall. (I. P. Vives, & N. L. Galés, Interviewers) doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.610
  7. Executive Yuan, Republic of China (Taiwan). (2023, September 12). Bilingual 2030. Retrieved from Executive Yuan, Republic of China (Taiwan): https://rb.gy/rsum6x
  8. González, D. M. (2014, June 16). Connecting theory and practice: A connectionist approach to second language acquisition. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 1-26.
  9. Hemmi, C., & Bates, D. L. (Eds.). (2021). International Perspectives on English Language Teaching. Springer Nature Switzerland AG: Palgrave Macmillan.
  10. Huang, Y.-P., & Tsou, W.-L. (2023). CLIL development in bilingual education in Taiwan: Past, present, and future. 課 程 與 教 學 , 26(1), 1-26. doi:10.6384/CIQ.202301_26(1).0001
  11. Hurajova, Anna. (2015). Content and language integrated learning as a bilingual educational approach in the European context. 11. 219-228.
  12. National Development Council. (2024, February 07). National Development Council Main Operations Publications. Retrieved from National Development Planning: http://tinyurl.com/2s6z6r3n
  13. Oxford University Department of Education. (2024). English as a Medium of Instruction.
  14. ÖZDEN, M. (2008). The effect of content knowledge on pedagogical content knowledge: The case of teaching phases of matters. E¤itim Dan›flmanl›¤› ve Araflt›rmalar› ‹letiflim Hizmetleri Tic. Ltd. fiti., 633-645.
  15. Quasi-experimental, experimental, and mixed research designs. (2019). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  16. Xuan, 丁. D. (2023, July 27). What Happened to Taiwan’s 2030 Bilingual Policy? Retrieved from Medium: https://tinyurl.com/b6rmzj3d