Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 4 no. 2 (2026)

The Mediating Effect of Epistemic Curiosity Between Perceived Critical Thinking Disposition and Research Competence of Senior High School Students Under Education 4.0

Julven Tuba | Princess May Quilaton | Glory Anne Aban | Jun Mark R. Panlaan

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Epistemic curiosity is increasingly recognized as a key factor in students’ learning engagement. However, its role in supporting critical thinking and research competence among senior high school students remains poorly established. This study examined the relationships among epistemic curiosity, perceived critical thinking disposition, and research competence, with particular focus on the mediating effect of curiosity. Quantitative, nonexperimental, descriptive–correlational methods were employed, utilizing data from 144 students via adopted survey questionnaires. Correlational analyses indicated no significant relationships among the three variables. Mediation analysis using the Sobel z-test revealed that epistemic curiosity did not significantly mediate the association between critical thinking disposition and research competence. These findings suggest that while students may exhibit high levels of curiosity and cognitive ability, these attributes do not necessarily result in enhanced research skills. The study emphasizes the need for interventions that combine curiosity-driven approaches with explicit instruction in metacognition, research methods, and self-regulated learning. Project QUEST is proposed as an intervention to enhance research competence among senior high school students while maintaining curiosity and engagement.



References:

  1. Aditya, R., Suhendi, E., & Samsudin, A. (2023). Exploring high school students' critical thinking skills using active learning: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 12(6). https://tinyurl.com/43amb9hc
  2. Alzate, O.E. (2025). Critical thinking and epistemic sophistication in science education. Journal of Intelligence, 13(8), 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13080093
  3. American Psychological Association. (2020). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
  4. Andreucci-Annunziata, P., Riedemann, A., Cortés, S., Mellado, A., del Río, M.T., & Vega-Muñoz, A. (2023). Conceptualizations and instructional strategies on critical thinking in higher education: A systematic review of systematic reviews. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1141686
  5. Bastida, E., Jr., & Saysi, J. (2023). Factors contributing to research writing apprehension among Senior High School students in a private educational institution in the Philippines. American Journal of Educational Research, 11(6), 421–429. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-11-6-11
  6. British Educational Research Association. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). https://tinyurl.com/3fjc48be
  7. Cárdenas, M.C., Farfan, C.A., & Ticlla, M.E. (2021). Development of critical thinking in high school students. Revista Iberoamericana de educación. https://doi.org/10.31876/ie.vi.118
  8. Chen, X., Twomey, K., Hayes, M., & Westermann, G. (2024). The limits of curiosity? New evidence for the roles of metacognitive abilities and curiosity in learning. Metacognition and Learning, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09407-9
  9. De Torres, R., Escamus, L., Manumbale, R., & Gayeta, N. (2022). Research writing competencies of Senior High School students in selected schools in Batangas Province. Asia Pacific Journal of Advanced Education and Technology. https://tinyurl.com/42s5r2zj
  10. Fadillah, R.W., Rahmat, A., Winarno, N., & Hanif, N.M. (2025). The role of curiosity in academic outcomes: A study of Junior High school science students. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 13(3), 775–792. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v13i3.45232
  11. Fahruddin, I., Mariani, S., & Asih, T.S.N. (2022). Analysis of epistemic curiosity and critical thinking ability in Mathematics learning. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 11(1), 55–61. https://tinyurl.com/mzvdhjud
  12. Fahruddin, I., Mariani, S., & Asih, T.S.N. (2022). Critical thinking ability reviewed from epistemic curiosity interest type in comic-assisted learning. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 11(1), 9–16. https://tinyurl.com/mrcmfy2m
  13. Farillon, L.M. (2022). Scientific reasoning, critical thinking, and academic performance in Science of selected Filipino Senior High School students. UTAMAX Journal of Ultimate Research and Trends in Education, 4(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.31849/utamax.v4i1.8284
  14. George-Reyes, C.E., López-Caudana, E.O., & Ramírez-Montoya, M.S. (2023). Research competencies in university students: Intertwining complex thinking and Education 4.0. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep478. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13767
  15. Given, L. (2008). The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://tinyurl.com/2fdpdcbk
  16. Gruber, M., & Fandakova, Y. (2021). Curiosity in childhood and adolescence — What can we learn from the brain. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 39, 178–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.03.031
  17. Habungan, D.L. (2019). Challenges encountered by Grade 12 students of Taal Senior High School in writing a research paper: Basis for proposed action plan. Ascendens Asia Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, 3(2C). https://tinyurl.com/5akh5hfh
  18. Harford, T. (2024). How to stay curious while avoiding distraction. Financial Times. 
  19. Hunaepi, H., Ikhsan, M., Suwono, H., & Sulisetijono, S. (2021). The contribution of epistemic curiosity and its relevance to science process skills on biology prospective teacher. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(Special Issue), 112–117. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7iSpecialIssue.1070
  20. Indah, R.N., Toyyibah, N., Budhiningrum, A.S., & Afifi, N. (2022). The research competence, critical thinking skills and digital literacy of Indonesian EFL students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(2), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1302.11
  21. Jovanović, T., Jaškov, M., Jelić, S., & Bogdanović, I. (2024). How do epistemic curiosity and metacognitive abilities shape physics performance and general school performance. Zbornik Instituta za pedagoska istrazivanja, 56(2), 239-258. https://doi.org/10.2298/ZIPI2402239J
  22. Khairuddin, Z., Daud, K.M., Anuar, N., Satimin, O., Yusof, F.H.M., & Sabri, S. (2024). Relationship between perceived students’ critical thinking skills and academic writing skills. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VIII(IIIS), 4709–4721. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2024.803343s
  23. Kim, S., Harris, P., & Néher, B. (2025). Curiosity can influence metacognitive processes. Metacognition and Learning, 20(1), Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-025-09444-y
  24. Koyuncuoğlu, D. (2023). The mediating role of general self-efficacy in the relationship between metacognition and academic success of university students. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, 7(1), 184-201. https://doi.org/10.51383/ijonmes.2023.302
  25. Kusumi, T. (2025). Critical thinking attitudes and inquiry-based learning skills of high school students: A three-year longitudinal study at a “Super Science” High School. The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.5926/jjep.73.28
  26. Lacson, E., & Dejos, E., Jr. (2022). Research skills scale for Senior High School students: Development and validation. International Journal of Educational Research & Innovation, 20(3), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6727946
  27. Litman, J. (2008). Interest and deprivation factors of epistemic curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(7), 1585–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.014
  28. Luna, A., & Ballado, R. (2025). Perceived research competence of Senior High School research teachers in the Division of Northern Samar. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 51(7), 830–841. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i72172
  29. Mertens, D., & Wilson, A. (2019). Program evaluation theory and practice: A comprehensive guide (2nd ed.). Guilford Publications. https://www.guilford.com/excerpts/mertens2_old_ch7.pdf?t=1
  30. Muis, K., Chevrier, M., Denton, C., & Losenno, K. (2021b). Epistemic emotions and epistemic cognition predict critical thinking about socio-scientific issues. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.669908
  31. Mussel, P. (2022). Processes underlying the relation between cognitive ability and curiosity with academic performance: A mediation analysis for epistemic behavior in a five-year longitudinal study. Journal of Intelligence, 10(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10020023
  32. Muthaharoh, S., & Sukarelawan, M.I. (2023). Improving high school students’ research skills through light diffraction experiments using the Problem-Based Learning model. Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika, 10(2), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.12928/jrkpf.v10i2.566
  33. Nakamura, S., Reinders, H., & Darasawang, P. (2022). A classroom-based study on the antecedents of epistemic curiosity in L2 learning. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 51(2), 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09839-x
  34. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2024) Fostering Higher-Order Thinking Skills online in higher education: A scoping review. OECD Publishing. https://tinyurl.com/26vtxx8r
  35. Paurillo, P. (2019). Research writing ability of Senior High School students as perceived by teachers of sampled schools in Quezon City. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3), 1788–1800. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2019.43.17881800
  36. Pilande, A. (2023). Level of critical thinking skills among Senior High School students of Alfredo Parilla National High School: A correlational study SY 2022–2023. (Unpublished manuscript). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374584375
  37. Pimentel, J. (2010). A note on the usage of Likert Scaling for research data analysis. USM R&D Journal, 18(2), 109–112. https://tinyurl.com/fcfxxv97
  38. Pinuto, J.C. (2024). Teaching competence of Senior High School teachers and its influence on students’ academic performance. Ignatian International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 2(6), 2566-2622. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12671359
  39. Ramos, J.-J. (2018). Critical thinking skills among Senior High School students and its effect on their academic performance. International Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 3(2), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.58885/ijssh.v3i2.60.jr
  40. Samante, J. (2023). Difficulties encountered by the Senior High School students in Labo Science and Technology High School in writing research. E-Saliksik. https://tinyurl.com/mspsr6w8
  41. Sari, T.N.I., Rakhmawati, A., Ratnawati, D., Purwanti, N., & Yulianti, Y. (2025). Quality of critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and creativity skills: Survey of high school students in biology learning. Didaktika Biologi: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Biologi, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.32502/didaktikabiologi.v9i1.185
  42. Selvarani, S., & Saroja, M. (2022). Critical thinking and academic achievement of secondary school students. International Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(4), 383–400. https://journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/5272
  43. Servado, R. (2024). The level of scientific research skills of Senior High School students in academic research. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19(10), 1-1. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11202917
  44. Shahzadi, U., & Saira. (2022). Levels of students’ critical thinking skills and their academic achievement at secondary level: A diagnostic study. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 3(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2022(3-II)15
  45. Sosu, E. (2013). The development and psychometric validation of a Critical Thinking Disposition Scale. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.09.002
  46. Sousa, V., Driessnack, M., & Mendes, I.A. (2007). An overview of research designs relevant to nursing: Part 1: Quantitative research designs. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 15(3), 502–507. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692007000300022
  47. Tracy, S. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. https://tinyurl.com/yck7mvsc
  48. van der Graaf, J., Lim, L., Fan, Y., Kilgour, J., Moore, J., Gašević, D., & Molenaar, I. (2022). The dynamics between self-regulated learning and learning outcomes: An exploratory approach and implications. Metacognition and Learning, 17(3), 745-771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09308-9
  49. Vilhunen, E., Turkkila, M., Lavonen, J., Salmela-Aro, K., & Juuti, K. (2022). Clarifying the relation between epistemic emotions and learning by using experience sampling method and pre-posttest design. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.826852
  50. Wandansari, S.A., & Hernawati. (2021). Studi curiosity, epistemic curiosity, dan keberhasilan belajar dalam konteks akademik. Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, 35(2), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.21009/pip.352.6

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic