Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 4 no. 2 (2026)

From Households to Communities: Building Flood Resilience Through Catchment Systems and Community Partnerships in Carrascal, Surigao del Sur

Ivan Louis C. Ulvida | Marph Daryl C. Porras

Discipline: social work

 

Abstract:

Flooding in Carrascal, Surigao del Sur, poses persistent and evolving risks driven by overlapping factors—climate variability, land-use changes, and socioeconomic vulnerabilities. This thesis examines the effectiveness of catchment systems and community partnerships in building long-term flood resilience in Carrascal through a convergent descriptive mixed-methods approach. The research combines quantitative survey data from 100 households across the municipality’s most flood-prone barangays with qualitative insights from 11 key informant interviews involving community leaders, MDRRMO, and barangay officials. Results show that technical solutions, such as rainwater catchment systems, are most effective when supported by robust social strategies, including participatory planning, cooperative maintenance, and inclusive governance. The findings indicate that catchment systems, when actively maintained and managed with widespread community participation, can significantly reduce flood volumes and improve local preparedness and recovery. Residents rate their readiness and ecological stewardship highly but point out gaps in neighbor-to-neighbor trust, communication, and long-term impact assessment. The study concludes that Carrascal’s adaptive progress depends on the continuous integration of engineering solutions and social capital, backed by transparent management and ongoing capacity building. Policy recommendations focus on strengthening multi-level partnerships, enhancing social cohesion, and establishing adaptive monitoring to ensure that flood mitigation strategies remain effective and relevant. These findings offer valuable empirical evidence and practical guidance for disaster risk reduction in flood-prone communities across the Philippines, positioning Carrascal as a model for grassroots-driven climate adaptation and sustainable development.



References:

  1. Abdullah, N., Ahmad, M.H., & Yusof, N.M. (2024). Community-based flood mitigation in Malaysia: Enhancing public participation and resilience. PMC. https://tinyurl.com/54vrtv3z
  2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  3. Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  4. Denzin, N.K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. McGraw-Hill.
  5. Esteban, M., Villanueva, J.M., & Villanueva, R.M. (2016). Adaptation to climate change and resilience in the Philippines. Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 19(2), 1–12.  
  6. Fano, J.A., & Takeuchi, K. (2010). Establishment of Philippine flood risk index by province based on natural and social factors. Paper presented at the International Conference on Environmental Sustainability.
  7. Fitriani, E., Suryadi, M., & Sari, D. (2022). Community adaptation strategies toward tidal flood: A case study in Langsa City. Jamba: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v14i1.1258
  8. Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 20. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03610-150420
  9. Gahlot, S., Gray, C., & Race, P. (2024). Resilience or rebuild? The costs and benefits of climate adaptation measures for flood. Swiss Re Management Ltd. https://tinyurl.com/y8mrxy2k
  10. Gaillard, J.C., & Mercer, J. (2013). From knowledge to action: Bridging gaps in disaster risk reduction. Progress in Human Geography, 37(1), 93–114.
  11. Galguera, F. (2018). Flood hazard mapping and risk assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 210, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.012
  12. Lasco, R.D., Pulhin, J.M., & Pulhin, F.B. (2022). Community-based approaches to disaster risk reduction in the Philippines: Lessons and policy implications. Philippine Studies, 70(1), 167–188. 
  13. Lew, D.K. (2023). Community engagement and adaptive governance in flood risk management. Environmental Policy and Governance, 33(1), 45–59. 
  14. McGlynn, B., Guerrero, A., Plummer, R., & Baird, J. (2023). Assessing social-ecological fit of flood planning governance. Ecology and Society, 28(1), Article 23. https://tinyurl.com/d2dvf27z
  15. Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133
  16. Pantaleon, R. (2024). Evaluating the effectiveness of catchment systems in flood mitigation. Philippine Journal of Water Resources, 12(2), 45–58.  
  17. Quinn, P., Wilkinson, M., Hewett, C., Adams, R., & Jonczyk, J. (2018). A Catchment Systems Engineering approach to managing floods, droughts and pollution using local knowledge and community partnerships. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 20, EGU2018-12923.
  18. The World Meteorological Organization. (2023). Community-based flood management: Step by step. The World Meteorological Organization. https://tinyurl.com/5xmkum4f
  19. UP Center for Integrative and Development Studies (CIDS UP). (2025, October 1). Flood-Control Fiasco: A Policy Reckoning for Accountability in the Philippines’ Public Works. https://tinyurl.com/mvbsdjke

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic