Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 4 no. 2 (2026)

Accent Discrimination and Identity Empowerment in Filipino Media: The Case of Melai Cantiveros-Francisco

Jonabel C. Humang-it

Discipline: English studies (non-specific)

 

Abstract:

Discrimination based on accent is a recurring sociolinguistic issue in multilingual cultures that stigmatizes regional accents and associates them with poor competence or social degradation. Such bias in the Philippine context shapes how speakers are appraised in both day-to-day and media interactions. The paper employs Empowerment Theory as the theoretical framework to analyze how accent stigma might be redefined as identity empowerment through the mediated speech of Filipino TV celebrity Melai Cantiveros- Francisco. It explores the role of her linguistic and extralinguistic resources as means of signifying empowered authenticity, including speech patterns, diction, humor, body language, and audience engagement. The study was conducted following an Interactional Sociolinguistics approach, employing a qualitative discourse-analytic design. As the main data, two publicly available episodes of the Magandang Buhay talk show on YouTube were used. The videos were selected based on premeditation, transcribed at their natural frequency, and analyzed through repeated coding, in which empowerment-specific aspects were identified in both the power of speech and the non-speech of verbal and nonverbal interactions. The results show three interconnected dimensions of empowerment: intrapersonal (self-efficacy and confidence, as reflected in the retention of accents and stance), interactional (social validation and supportive alignment with co-participants and interactional framing), and behavioral (consistent authenticity and agency across communicative situations). Taken together, these trends show that a regionalist accent does not function as a deficit but rather serves as an interactional tool for selfconstruction and validity within the discourse. The paper identifies how the empowered accent performance conveys the current ideology of the standard language in a negative manner and shifts toward a scenario in which the regional voice is treated as a positive attribute of originality. The findings contribute to knowledge of linguistic identity formation in Philippine media and underscore the importance of inclusive media practices that recognize linguistic diversity as a tool of social empowerment.



References:

  1. Alsop, R., & Heinsohn, N. (2005). Measuring empowerment in practice: Structuring analysis and framing indicators. Policy Research Working Paper; No. 3510. © World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3510
  2. Alzeer, J., & Benmerabet, H. (2023). The development of human personality: A comprehensive overview. Psychological Disorders and Research, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31487/j.PDR.2023.01.01
  3. Attardo, S. (2017). Humor in language. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.342
  4. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company.
  6. Bautista, M.L. (2000). Defining standard Philippine English: Its status and grammatical features. https://tinyurl.com/2w55szc2
  7. Bender, K., Cyphers, G., García, A.R., & Ferguson, K. (2021). Empowerment theory. In M. D. Lewis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Social Work (pp. 1–11). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.1144
  8. Bradley, M. (2025). Authenticity: The art of genuine self-presentation—and why it matters. Monique Bradley. https://tinyurl.com/46y6hzum
  9. Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407
  10. Burgos, M., Politico, J., & Vergara, M. (2024). Cultural identity and English language learning: Narratives of Filipino college students. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 2(12), 487–500. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14550487
  11. Clough, S., & Duff, M. (2020). The role of gesture in communication and cognition: Implications for understanding and treating neurogenic communication disorders. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, Article 323. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00323
  12. Coupland, N. (2007). Style: Language variation and identity. Cambridge University Press. https://tinyurl.com/bpzbmhyt
  13. Darvin, R., & Sun, T. (2024). Intercultural communication and identity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009206754
  14. Delaney, A. (2022, March 11). Filler words and floor holders: The sounds our thoughts make. JSTOR Daily. https://tinyurl.com/4e25e4da
  15. Derwing, T., & Munro, M. (2009). Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language Teaching, 42(4), 476–490. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480800551X
  16. Du Bois, J.W., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Cumming, S., & Paolino, D. (1993). Outline of discourse transcription. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research (pp. 45–89). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  17. Ebben, M., & Bull, E. (2023). Constructing authenticity: Social media influencers and the shaping of online identity. In IntechOpen. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/1153494
  18. Fuse, A., Alloggio, K., & Yang, S. (2023). Listener factors related to the perception of accented speech. Communication Disorders Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/15257401231183648
  19. Gluszek, A., & Dovidio, J. (2010). The way they speak: A social psychological perspective on the stigma of nonnative accents in communication. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 214–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309359288
  20. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
  21. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall.
  22. Gonzales, D.H. (2025). “Shimenet” as shibboleth: Linguistic performance in Philippine social media. Journal of Discourse Review, 1(1), 65–74.
  23. Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press. https://tinyurl.com/3bn83cwx
  24. Gustilo, L., Dumanig, F., & Jubilado, R. (2025). General attitudes, intelligibility, and acceptability: How Philippine English is perceived by Filipino-Americans. Languages, 10(6), 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10060124
  25. Haddad, L., & Toney-Butler, T.J. (2018). Empowerment. In StatPearls. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430929/
  26. Hall, K., & Nilep, C. (2015). Code-switching, identity, and globalization. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd ed., pp. 597–619). John Wiley & Sons. https://tinyurl.com/yes3ms6w
  27. Hideg, I., Shen, W., Koval, C., & Yu, M. (2024). Hear, hear! A review of accent discrimination at work. Current Opinion in Psychology, 56, 101906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101906
  28. Jegede, O.O. (2025). Humour as a pragmatic tool in multicultural online interactions. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 59(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-025-09930-7
  29. Joos, M. (1967). The five clocks: A linguistic excursion into the five styles of English usage. Harcourt, Brace & World.
  30. Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125
  31. Kipchoge, R. (2024). Language and identity: Code-switching practices among multilingual communities. European Journal of Linguistics, 3(3), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.47941/ejl.2053
  32. Lakshmikantha, S. (2019). Language and identity: How dialects shape cultural identity. JETIR: Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 6(2). https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1902H18.pdf
  33. Lee, C. (2014). Language choice and self-presentation in social media: The case of university students in Hong Kong. The language of Social Media (pp. 91–111). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029317_5
  34. Lippi-Green, R. (1997). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. Routledge.
  35. Llorente-Alonso, M., García-Ael, C., & Topa, G. (2024). A meta-analysis of psychological empowerment: Antecedents, organizational outcomes, and moderating variables. Current Psychology, 43, 1759–1784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04369-8
  36. Mahboob, A., & Cruz, P. (2013). English and Mother-Tongue-Based Multilingual Education: Language attitudes in the Philippines. Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 1, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.59960/1.a1
  37. Malon, J. (2022). The drama on provincial accented speech. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 4(3), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v4i3.1031
  38. Marx, N. (2002). Never quite a “Native Speaker”: Accent and identity in the L2—and the L1. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(2), 264–280. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.59.2.264
  39. McKenzie, R. (2010). The social psychology of English as a global language. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8566-5
  40. Mendoza, H. (2020). An investigation of Filipino ESL learners’ language stereotypes toward Philippine lectal speakers using a matched guise test. Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 8, 57–83. https://doi.org/10.59960/8.a1
  41. Mona, A. (2024). Code-switching in multilingual societies. European Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.47941/ejl.1770
  42. Obenza, B., Caloc, L.J., & Baradillo, D. (2024). A political discourse analysis of the Philippine politicians’ speech acts on people’s initiative: A forensic linguistics study. European Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejals.v7i2.559
  43. Ochs, E. (1993). Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(3), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3
  44. Orelus, P. (2020). Other people’s English accents matter: Challenging standard English accent hegemony. Excellence in Education Journal, 9(1), 120–148. http://www.excellenceineducationjournal.org/
  45. Pélissier, M., & Ferragne, E. (2022). The N400 reveals implicit accent-induced prejudice. Speech Communication, 137, 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2021.10.004
  46. Quinto, E.J., Ong, A.K., Yabut, G., Muralla, G.A., Valenzuela, R.A., & Villariba, Y.D. (2024). Prejudice towards regional accents of Philippine English. English World-Wide, 45(2), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.00091.qui
  47. Rangaves, D. (2024). Identity empowerment: How it makes you strong. Dr. Diana Rangaves, PharmD, RPh. https://tinyurl.com/3tdee4he
  48. Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15(2), 121–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00919275
  49. Roberts, C., Davies, E., & Jupp, T. (2014). Language and discrimination. Taylor & Francis.
  50. Sarooj, R. (2020). A qualitative study on the effect of linguistic discrimination on the students of Iqra University. Pakistan Review of Social Sciences (PRSS), 1(1), 59–68. https://tinyurl.com/2rtm4e4a
  51. Sidle, C.C. (2019). Empowered: Leadership development for higher education. Academic Impressions.
  52. Stangor, C., & Walinga, J. (2014). Introduction to Psychology – 1st Canadian Edition. Victoria, B.C.: BCcampus. https://opentextbc.ca/introductiontopsychology/
  53. Sumantry, D., & Choma, B. (2021). Accent-based stereotyping, prejudice, and their predictors. Personality and Individual Differences, 179, 110894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110894
  54. Tatel, S.P. (2019). Linguistic insecurity among Filipino college students of English: The case of De La Salle University. Philippine Journal of Linguistics, 50(2), 115–131. https://www.pjl-phil.com/article/2019/50/francis-b.-tatel
  55. Teshaboyeva, N.Z., & Xidirova, D.N. (2024). Accent: Its importance and functions in communication and sociolinguistic contexts. Obrazovanie Nauka i Innovatsionnye Idei v Mire, 58(1), 164–167. https://scientific-jl.org/obr/article/view/3261
  56. Wakat, G., Paulino, F., Cagaoan, S., & Ulla, M. (2023). Of tongues and ties: Surfacing inclusive strategies in linguistically diverse classrooms. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2268462. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2268462
  57. Wang, Y., & Sun, P.P. (2024). Development and validation of scales for speaking self-efficacy: Constructs, sources, and relations. PLOS One, 19(1), e0297517. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297517
  58. Whitworth, N. (2021, May 3). Accent, identity and prejudice. Carnegie Education (Leeds Beckett University). https://tinyurl.com/msbjn7s4
  59. Wijayanti, R.A. (2024). Linguistic diversity in education: Strategies for inclusive learning environments. English Language and Education Spectrum, 4(1), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.53416/electrum.v4i1.228
  60. Yan, X. (2024a). Effects of accent stigma on second language learners: A systematic review and research agenda. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1369119. 
  61. Yan, X. (2024b). The impact of accent stigma on self-efficacy and acculturation strategy among international students in the United States. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1414282. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1414282
  62. Yang, S.-F. S. (1993). The impact of empowerment on job satisfaction: A case study in a hotel (Master’s thesis). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations, 339. https://doi.org/10.25669/z53y-vmki
  63. Zeng, J., & Li, X. (2023). Navigating language ideologies in the Philippines: A critical analysis of discourses surrounding language policy. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 405. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01911-8
  64. Zimmerman, M. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of Community Psychology (pp. 43–63). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_2

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic