Home⇛Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Sustainable Development⇛vol. 13 no. 1 Part 5 (2025)

Restorative Justice Practices in Yunnan Province, China

Cu Pong | Philip B. Magtaan

Discipline: Law

 

Abstract:

This study mainly focuses on the indepth discussion of restorative justice practices in Yunnan Province, China, with a particular emphasis on implementation, challenges, and implications. This study used descriptive research methods to interview 450 individuals from various judicial departments in Yunnan Province, China. The research results indicate that in the implementation of restorative justice in Yunnan Province, the legal framework, organizational capacity, and feedback mechanism have been recognized to a certain extent, but the feedback mechanism still needs further strengthening. In terms of challenges, the current Criminal Procedure Law has procedural issues such as unclear legal provisions, insufficient practice in economic and environmental crimes, single restorative measures, and a lack of effective community supervision mechanisms. In terms of the Implications of restorative justice practices, restorative justice has positive effects on cultural aspects (promoting cross-border ethnic harmony), economic production development (reducing various dispute losses), and political and governance systems (playing a role in resolving grassroots conflicts). Age significantly influences the legal framework and organizational efficiency in implementing restorative justice, yet participation rates remain consistent across different work units and types, showing little to no notable fluctuation. Implementing the strategies, facing challenges, and observing impacts are closely linked, showing a strong positive correlation. This study proposes a series of targeted improvement measures, including improving the legal framework, strengthening organizational capacity building, optimizing feedback mechanisms, addressing procedural challenges, resolving political challenges, strengthening social participation, and deepening positive influence. The fundamental purpose is to promote the practical development of restorative justice in Yunnan Province.



References:

  1. Liu J. (2021). Restorative environmental justice. Master's thesis, Sichuan University). https://doi.org/10.27342/d.cnki.gscdu
  2. [2]        Zhang L. (2020). Application and improvement of restorative justice in the crime of indiscriminate logging. Master's thesis, Central South University of Economics and Law. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD202202&filename=1020964534.nh
  3. [3]        Liao B. (2022). The application of restorative justice concept in sentencing negotiation. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities Humanities and Social Sciences Edition (03), 65-72.
  4. [4]        Godwin, G. (2023). Restorative justice. https://law.asia/restorative-justice-china/
  5. [5]        Lui, W.C.Y. (2021). Comparing the Implementation of Restorative Justice in the Inquisitorial System of China with the Adversarial Tradition in Hong Kong. In: Gavrielides, T. (eds) Comparative Restorative Justice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74874-6_9
  6. [6]        Jiang, J., Chen, Z. Victim Welfare, Social Harmony, and State Interests: Implementing Restorative Justice in Chinese Environmental Criminal Justice. Asian J Criminol 18, 171–188 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-022-09376-5
  7. [7]        Zhang, Y., & Xia, Y. (2021). Can restorative justice reduce incarceration? A story from China. Justice Quarterly, 38(7), 1471–1491. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2021.1950814
  8. [8]        Salm, J., Da Silva Neto, N., & Pamplona, J. (2021). Restorative justice: a substantive, intergenerational and ecological approach in the Amazon Region of Brazil. Contemporary Justice Review, 24(2), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2021.1910813
  9. [9]        Zhang, Y., & Xia, Y. (2021b). Can restorative justice reduce incarceration? A story from China. Justice Quarterly, 38(7), 1471–1491. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2021.1950814
  10. [10]      Jones, A. (2024). The Heart of Facilitation in Restorative Justice. https://www.learningforjustice.org/magazine/fall-2024/the-heart-of-facilitation-in-restorative-justice
  11. [11]      Taylor, T. O., & Bailey, T. M. (2021). The Restorative Justice Attitudes Scale: Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation. The Counseling Psychologist, 50(1), 6–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/00110000211044485
  12. [12]      Zhou, Z., & Wong, W. (2021). Young children’s understanding of restorative justice. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715279
  13. [13]      Stewart, R., & Ezell, J. M. (2022). Understanding Perceptions, Barriers, and Opportunities around Restorative Justice in Urban High Schools. Urban Education, 59(9), 2619–2648. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859221119110
  14. [14]      Xiao S. (2022). To promote social harmony and stability with restorative justice [N]. Procuratorial Daily, 2022-05-24 (003).
  15. [15]      Tom B, & Huang Y. (2021). Punitive Recovery and Restorative Justice. Journal of Henan Police College, (03), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.16231/j.cnki.jh pc.2021.03.008.
  16. [16]      Wen L. (2022). The "hexagon" judicial shield guards the biodiversity [N]. Rule of Law Daily, 2022-03-November (008).

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic