Research culture and ethics of faculty researchers at the university level
Renelle Caraig
Abstract:
A strong ethical foundation safeguards the rights and welfare of research
participants, fosters public trust, and aligns research practices with both
global standards and local values. This paper will address university faculty
researchers' research culture and ethical practices. The paper will examine
the shared challenges, incentives, and advantages of research at the
individual, professional, and institutional levels. This paper facilitated
purposive sampling to select the four participants who will undergo key
informant interviews as the data collection process and used reflexive
thematic analysis for data analysis. based on the extracted data, the global
theme “research uplifts human potential that goes beyond the community”
was created to summarize the study. the analysis is organized into three main
themes, illustrating how research influences and extends beyond academic
and community boundaries. The analysis indicates that research driven by
institutional and personal motivations can significantly uplift human
potential and extend its benefits beyond academic settings into the broader
community. This multi-faceted approach to understanding research culture
and ethics illustrates the complex interplay between individual aspirations,
institutional frameworks, and societal contributions.
References:
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
- Caraig, R. V. (2023). A Proposed faculty loading guide framework for the research subjects in the senior high school in the Philippines. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 15(1), 178-191. https://ijci.net/index.php/IJCI/article/view/1053
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. https://edge.sagepub.com/creswellrd5e
- Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Cornell University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctt1hhfnmg
- Khodyakov, D., Stockdale, S., Jones, A., Mango, J., Jones, F., & Lizaola, E. (2013). On measuring community participation in research. Health Education & Behavior: The Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 40(3), 346–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198112459050
- Lasco, G., Yu, V. G., & Palileo-Villanueva, L. (2021). How ethics committees and requirements are structuring health research in the Philippines: a qualitative study. BMC Medical Ethics, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00653-z
- Peshkin, A. (1988). In search of Subjectivity—One’s own. Educational Researcher, 17(7), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x017007017
- Quitoras, M. C. L., & Abuso, J. E. (2021). Best practices of higher education institutions (HEIs) for the development of research Culture in the Philippines. Pedagogical Research, 6(1), em0087. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/9355
- Sabio, R. A., & Sabio, C. J. (2013). Current challenges and prospects facing distance education in the Philippines. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 11(1), 59-77. https://asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/222
- Salazar-Clemeña, R. M., Almonte-Acosta, S. A. (2007). Developing research culture in Philippine higher education institutions: Perspectives of university faculty. In Proceedings of the Competition, Cooperation, and Change in the Academic Profession: Shaping Higher Education’s Contribution to Knowledge and Research.
ISSN 3028-1628 (Online)
ISSN 3028-161X (Print)