Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Slang: Analyzing Oral Communication Attitudes Within Philippine Higher Education
Robert Salvador | Donna Mae T. Parrar | Lerma P. Yapiso
Discipline: Linguistics
Abstract:
This mixed-methods study examined the sociolinguistic perspectives
on slang in oral communication within a Philippine state university. It sought to
identify and classify the most prevalent slang terms, assess their effectiveness
across various demographic groups, and explore attitudes toward slang within
social and academic contexts. Employing an explanatory sequential design, the
research used descriptive statistics to categorize slang terms by their linguistic
formation, origin, and contextual meaning. Through Lichtman's 3Cs method—
coding, categorizing, and concept formation—the researchers unearthed complex
attitudes toward slang, emphasizing its deep roots in gay lingo and Internet
culture. Findings revealed that while slang is widely recognized as a powerful
tool for enhancing social cohesion and bridging communication gaps, its
effectiveness varies significantly by age, gender, and residence. Despite its
widespread use, concerns were raised about its potential to hinder clear
communication, particularly in formal academic settings. The study concluded
that while slang is integral to identity formation and social interaction, its use
should be carefully moderated to ensure clarity and effectiveness in
communication. To address these challenges, it was recommended that
educational institutions incorporate discussions on the sociolinguistic
implications of slang into curricula, establish guidelines for its appropriate use,
and promote cross-generational dialogue to bridge communication gaps. This
balanced approach may help maintain the cultural relevance of slang while
upholding academic discourse standards.
References:
- Abdullah, N.N., & Mohd Ghazali, N. (2021). Slang language use in social media among Malaysian youths: A sociolinguistic perspective. International Young Scholars Journal of Languages, 4(2), 68–79. http://irep.iium.edu.my/95013/
- Cabantac-Lumabi, B.M. (2020). The lexical trend of backward speech among Filipino millennials on Facebook. International Journal of English and Comparative Literary Studies, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.47631/ijecls.v1i1.148
- Ciccarino, I., & da Silva, J. (2024). A mixed-methods strategy for small samples in ill-structured literature. 23, 17–25. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecrm.23.1.2477
- Dimaculangan, N. (2022). Speakers’ ambivalent attitude toward Philippine English: An issue for integrating the variety into ESL instruction. Journal of World Englishes and Educational Practices, 4(2), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.32996/jweep.2022.4.2.8
- Dreisbach, J.L., & Demeterio, F.P., III. (2021). Language use and preference in the multilingual context of Davao City, Philippines. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(1), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i1.18454
- Germe, A.A., & Carado, C. (2025). Factors influencing the use of slang language among Generation Z students. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 30(3), 15–25. https://tinyurl.com/3bjcmam8
- Gimadieva, E. (2024). The potential of the linguistic and information technology of the GLIGLISH neural network in teaching foreign language oral communication to students of a language university. Philology and Culture, 2, 272-280. https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2024-76-2-272-280
- Giles, H., Edwards, A., & Walther, J. (2023). Communication accommodation theory: Past accomplishments, current trends, and future prospects. Language Sciences, 99, 101571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101571
- Gregorio, J.F., Briol, S.R., Miraflores, R.B., & Biray, E.T. (2022). Swardspeak as a communication medium among education students in a state university. The Research Probe, 2(2), 20–24.
- Guzman, J. (2017). Slang as a means of language in low-socioeconomic status individuals: A cross-comparison of multicultural individuals in the United States. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. https://ijllnet.com/journals/Vol_4_No_4_December_2017/5.pdf
- Haro Álvarez, G. (2024). Cohesión social en cooperativas del municipio de San Andrés Cholula, Puebla [Social cohesion in cooperatives of the municipality of San Andrés Cholula, Puebla]. Economía, Sociedad y Territorio, 24(75), e1986. https://doi.org/10.22136/est20241986
- Hendrajati, E., Zahrok, S., Subali, E., Agustin, D.S.Y., & Wahyuddin. (2023). The impact of slang usage on Indonesian from a sociolinguistic perspective. Journal of Development Research, 7(1), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.28926/jdr.v7i1.302
- Jebaselvi, C.A.E., Mohanraj, K., Thangamani, A., & Kumar, M.R. (2023). The impact of social media on the evolution of language and communication trends. Shanlax International Journal of English, 12(1), 41–44. https://doi.org/10.34293/english.v12i1.6725
- Jeresano, E., & Carretero, M. (2022). Digital culture and social media slang of Gen Z. United International Journal for Research & Technology, 3(4), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36361.93285
- Lesada, J. (2017). Taglish in Metro Manila: An analysis of Tagalog-English code-switching. University of Michigan Library. https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/139623
- Lichtman, M. (2014). Qualitative research for the social sciences. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544307756
- Liu, J.Y., Zhang, X.Y., & Li, H.X. (2023). Analysis of language phenomena in internet slang: A case study of internet dirty language. Open Access Library Journal, 10: e10484. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1110484
- Matias, F.M. (2023). Impact of internet slang on the academic writing of computer science students. American Research Journal of Humanities Social Science (ARJHSS), 6(7), 44–54. https://tinyurl.com/5n78t5ue
- Munalim, L., Genuino, C., & Tuttle, B. (2022). Turn-taking model for Filipino high-context communication style from no-answered and non-answered questions in faculty meetings. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 28(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2022-2801-04
- Puspitasari, I., & Setiawan, S. (2023). Critical discourse analysis on Banyumas tourism promotion media. Tell: Teaching of English Language and Literature Journal, 12(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.30651/tell.v12i1.20430
- Purwati, D. (2020). The effects of lecturers' formal and informal talks on students' understanding of the material in the language learning process. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v8i1.1315
- Quimosing-Ocay, A., & Ocampo, D. (2024). Decoding gay lingo: A morpho-sociolinguistic analysis of swardspeak among college students. Issues in Language Studies, 18(3), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.5850.2024
- Rafiqoh, A. (2023). The effect of using slang among students towards the Indonesian language. Aladzkiya International of Education and Social (AIoEs), 4(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.55311/aioes.v4i2.201
- Rosales, H. (2019). Stylistics variation: Understanding gay lingo in social perspectives. The Normal Lights, 13(1), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.56278/tnl.v13i1.1240
- Sathiyaraj, A., Deivam, M., & Arul Kavya, T. (2025). Navigating multilingual classrooms: Expectations, opportunities, and challenges in inclusive pedagogy. FORTELL: A Journal of Teaching English Language and Literature, 50, 135–140.
- Sicam, F.P., & Lucas, R.I. (2016). Language attitudes of adolescent Filipino bilingual learners towards English and Filipino. Asian Englishes, 18(2), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2016.1179474
- Sikandar, M.H., Riaz, A., & Mah-e-Nao. (2022). The impact of slang on the academic writing of undergraduate students in Pakistan. Webology, 19(3), 1115–1127. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2692267020
- Thuy, V.L.T. (2021). The phenomenon of standard deviated language of student communication and the purity preservation issue of Vietnamese. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 15(3). https://ijicc.net/images/Vol_15/Iss_3/15319_Vinh_2021_E1_R.pdf
- Trimastuti, W. (2017). An analysis of slang words used in social media. Jurnal Dimensi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 5(2), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.24269/dpp.v5i2.497
- Ulla, M.B., Macaraeg, J.M., & Ferrera, R. (2024). ‘What’s the word? That’s the word!’: Linguistic features of Filipino queer language. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), 2322232. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2322232
- Vacalares, M., Salas, A.F., Babac, B.J., Cagalawan, A., & Calimpong, C. (2023). The intelligibility of internet slangs between millennials and Gen Zers: A comparative study. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 9(1), 400–409. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2023.9.1.0456
- Yap, E.J., & Saludez, L.M. (2022). Students’ morpho-pragmatic awareness of the codified Philippine English and millennial slang as input to teaching vocabulary in junior high school. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(8), 2–25. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7003656
Full Text:
Note: Kindly Login or Register to gain access to this article.
ISSN 2984-8385 (Online)
ISSN 2984-8288 (Print)