Program Satisfaction of the Pioneering Graduates of the Bachelor in Secondary Education &ndash;Science in a Philippine State University

Rey-mark  Basagre,

Program Satisfaction of the Pioneering Graduates of the Bachelor in Secondary Education –Science in a Philippine State University

Abstract:

After the implementation of the new teacher education curricular program, the BSE major in Science program had its first batch of graduates in the academic year 2021-2022. Yet, studies on the implementation of this new curricular offering have not yet been carried out. This study utilized a descriptive survey as a method of research. This study uses a scale to gather data on the BSEd - Science program graduates’ satisfaction with the curriculum and instruction, facilities, and student support. Data were treated using mean, frequency, and rank. Interviews with college administrators, graduates, and the employers of the graduates were also conducted to gather relevant data that could help in the analysis of results. Results showed that the graduates are “satisfied” with the program’s curriculum and instruction, support to students, and facilities, with a mean of 4.4, 4.37, and 4.01, respectively. Further, the strengths and areas for improvement of the program were identified. The identified strengths of the program are an organized and flexible curriculum, learner-centered and academic freedom, relevant competencies, approachable and competent faculty, and good resources and facilities. The identified themes for the areas for improvement of the program are the improvement of the laboratory room and apparatus, handson laboratory activities, and others. Overall, the students are “satisfied” with implementing the new program.

References:

Abdullah, Z., Alsagoff, S. A., Ramlan, M. F., & Sabran, M. S. (2014). Measuring student performance, student satisfaction and its impact on graduate employability. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(4), 108-124.
Aggarwal, Y. P. (2008). Meaning of the term-descriptive survey research method’. International journal of transformations in business management, 1(6), 2231-6868.
Aktamis, H., & Ergin, Ö. (2008, June). The effect of scientific process skills education on students’ scientific creativity, science attitudes and academic achievements. In Asia-Pacific forum on science learning and teaching (Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1-21). The Education University of Hong Kong, Department of Science and Environmental Studies.
Altawalbeh, K., & Al-Ajlouni, A. (2022). The Impact of Distance Learning on Science Education during the Pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education, 5(1), 43-66.
Bañez, S. E., & Pardo, C. (2016). Licensure examination performance of BSEd-biological and physical science graduates in a state university in Northern Philippines. Journal of Educational and Human Resource Development (JEHRD), 4, 119-132.
Basagre, R. M., Alpaño, J. M., Barquilla, J., Bongalos, J., De La Torre, A. C., & Nares, J. C. (2022). Projectile Horizontal and Vertical Motion Independence Demonstrator. SEAQIS Journal of Science Education, 2(02), 12-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.58249/sjse.v2i02.68
Beltran-Cruz, M., & Cruz, S. B. B. (2013). The Use of Internet-Based Social Media as a Tool in Enhancing Student’s Learning Experiences in Biological Sciences. Higher Learning Research Communications, 3(4), 68-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v3i4.170
Berney, M. F. (1989). Physical facilities evaluation in teacher education programs. In A practical guide to teacher education evaluation (pp. 169-176). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Butt, B. Z., & Ur Rehman, K. (2010). A study examining the students satisfaction in higher education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5446-5450.
Basagre, R. M. G. (2018, July). Inquiry-Based Formative Assessment in Grade 10 Electricity and Magnetism. In Ascendens Asia Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2, No. 4). http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14194.73926
Basagre, R. M. (2023, April). Effects of hands-on, structured inquiry activities on students’ conceptual understanding. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2619, No. 1). AIP Publishing.
Cañete, C. M. T., Durano, C. G. P., Libres, D. C., Pria, L. C. G., Lantajo, J. T., & Virgo, J. K. Science Process Skills of BSEd Science Majors in Leyte Normal University: Level of Development.
Cuadra, L. J., Aure, M. R. K. L., & Gonzaga, G. L. (2019). The use of tracer study in improving undergraduate programs in the University. Asia Pacific Higher Education Research Journal (APHERJ), 6(1).
Dacorro, J. C., Españo, J. M., & Villanueva, J. M. (2022). Optimizing Academic Achievement of Second-Year BSED-Science Students Using Worldwide Telescope (WWT) as an Exploratory Tool in Learning Astronomy. Available at SSRN 4104638. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4104638
Department of Education. (2019). DepEd Order No. 12, s. 2019: Policy Guidelines on the K to 12 Basic Education Program
Diez, J., Garde, J. R., & Lanticse, G. M. (2022). Using Web-Based Interactive Exercises to Increase the Academic Achievement of First-Year BSEd-Science Students in Stoichiometry. Available at SSRN 4092890. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4092890
Ferrer, R. C., Buted, D. R., & Ferrer, I. M. C. (2015). Performance of BSEd science graduates in licensure examination for teachers: Basis for a regression model. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(5), 1-6.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty‐first century. Science education, 88(1), 28-54.
Labaria, J. (2016). Job Satisfaction and Employability of Education Graduates of Western Philippines University-Quezon Campus. In International Conference on Research in Social Sciences, Humanities and Education (SSHE-2016) May (pp. 20-21). http://dx.doi.org/10.17758/URUAE.UH0516128 1
Laguatan, R. P. (2020). Science teacher’s qualities: basis for faculty sustainable program. Review, 121.
Maslow, A. H. (1948). “Higher” and “lower” needs. The journal of psychology, 25(2), 433-436.
Okabe, M. (2013). Where does Philippine education go?: the” K to 12” program and reform of Philippine basic education. IDE Discussion Paper, 425.
Özgelen, S. (2012). Students’ science process skills within a cognitive domain framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(4), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.846a
Rainsbury, E., Hodges, D. L., Burchell, N., & Lay, M. C. (2002). Ranking workplace competencies: Student and graduate perceptions.
Rogayan, Danilo V. “Retrospective Evaluation of the Science Education Program in a Philippine State University.” Online Submission 8.7 (2019): 352-369.
Sadlak, J., & Cai, L. N. (2009). The world-class University as part of a new higher education paradigm: From institutional qualities to systemic excellence. Bucharest: Unesco-Cepes.
Strong, M. (2006). Does new teacher support affect student achievement. Research Brief, 6(1), 1-4.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability.
Towers, E., Rushton, E. A., Gibbons, S., Steadman, S., Brock, R., Cao, Y., ... & Richardson, C. (2023). The “problem” of teacher quality: exploring challenges and opportunities in developing teacher quality during the Covid-19 global pandemic in England. Educational Review, 1-17.