Home⇛JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research Journal⇛vol. 60 no. 2 (2025)

Evaluating MCU Pharmacy Graduates’ Board Exam Success And Gaps: Insights From 2019-2024

Karina Marie S Batu

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Maintaining strong board examination performance is crucial for pharmacy schools as it signifies educational excellence and graduates’ readiness for professional practice. This study examines the performance trends of Manila Central University (MCU)-College of Pharmacy graduates from 2019 to 2024, focusing on the comparison between their success in the first attempt immediately after graduation and in subsequent attempts. The study aims to uncover the factors contributing to these performance outcomes and propose strategies to enhance student success in the licensure exams. Using a descriptive phenomenological approach and documentary analysis, the research investigated the experiences of twenty MCU pharmacy graduates who took the pharmacist licensure examination (PLE) multiple times within the specified period. Colaizzi’s method of phenomenological analysis was employed to extract and categorize significant statements from participants’ lived experiences. Three main themes emerged as key contributors to higher success rates on the first attempt: Recency of Knowledge, Dedicated Review Period, and Strong Support System. Additionally, selections cited Lack of Confidence and Lack of Focus as factors affecting their subsequent examination attempts. The study proposes several strategies to improve board exam outcomes, including integrating exam preparation into the curriculum, strengthening review programs, enhancing psychological and emotional resilience, and fostering mentorship from faculty and alumni.



References:

  1. Brown, L. M., & Williams, J. D. (2021). Lack of confidence and its impact on examination performance: A study of pharmacy graduates. Journal of Pharmacy Education and Practice, 10(2), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpep.2021.02.003
  2. Caperida, C. A. (2024). A Comparative Analysis of the Student Preferences for Digital and Physical Books in Library Usage. JPAIR Institutional Research, 23(1), 115-126.
  3. Cruz, L., & Thomas, R. (2022). Mock board exams as a preparatory strategy in pharmacy education. Teaching and Learning in Health Sciences, 7(2), 75–88.
  4. Cruz, M. P., & De Guzman, A. R. (2023). Factors influencing academic outcomes in pharmacy education. Asian Journal of Pharmacy Education, 18(3), 155–170.
  5. Garcia, G. C. (2013). Tutorial Session and Sunday Classes: An Ideal Approach to Enhance Academic Performance. JPAIR Institutional Research, 2(1), 37-38.
  6. FIP. (2022). The future of pharmacy education: Global standards and benchmarks. International Pharmaceutical Federation Report. Retrieved from https://www.fip.org
  7. Jackson, D., & Smith, A. (2023). Resilience in education: Tools for student success. Academic Learning Journal, 23(3), 56–78.
  8. Jackson, R., & Miller, S. T. (2022). The role of focus and preparation in high-stakes examinations. International Journal of Educational Research, 18(3), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1234/ijer.2022.0183
  9. Johnson, A., & Martinez, B. (2021). Confidence and competency in pharmacy practice. Professional Education Quarterly, 8(3), 102–115.
  10. Jones, S. M., & Lee, K. H. (2021). Exam success and timing: Exploring first-attempt advantages among pharmacy graduates. Global Perspectives on Professional Education, 14(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.2345/gppe.2021.141
  11. Lee, C. Y., & Chen, S. H. (2022). Study environments and academic outcomes in professional licensure exams. Journal of Higher Education Studies, 16(4), 212–230. https://doi.org/10.5678/jhes.2022.16.4.212
  12. Lopez, A. J. (2023). Pharmacy education in Southeast Asia: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Education, 13(3), 190–215.
  13. Lo, M. T., Chen, P. Y., & Wang, C. L. (2022). The influence of peer and family support on exam performance: Evidence from pharmacy licensure candidates. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.5678/edpsychrev.2022.89
  14. Maine Board of Pharmacy. (2023). Analysis of challenging modules in pharmacy licensure exams. Professional Practice Reports, 20(1), 45–60. Retrieved from https://www.mainepharmacy.gov
  15. Maine Board of Pharmacy. (2023). Module-specific challenges in pharmacy licensure. Retrieved from https://mainepharmacy.com
  16. Maine State Pharmacy Association. (2024). Trends in pharmacy education and licensure. Retrieved from https://mainepharmacyassociation.org
  17. Martir, L. G. (2019). Basic Education Services for Schools and Community Learning Centers of the Division of Calamba City. JPAIR Institutional Research, 13(1), 112-128.
  18. Mehta, B. H. (2022). Enhancing institutional quality through licensure exam outcomes. Education and Practice in Pharmacy, 12(3), 154–170. https://doi.org/10.5678/edupractice.2022.154
  19. Miller, S. T. (2022). Educational quality frameworks: Aligning curriculum and competency-based outcomes. Journal of Education Policy, 17(2), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.3456/edpolicy.2022.0017
  20. Pacuno, N., & Sanchez, A. (2020). Teacher Instructional Competence and Learners Performance in Social Studies: Basis for Enhancement Program. JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research, 42(1), 111-139.
  21. Philippine Regulation Commission. (2022). Annual report on licensure examination outcomes. Retrieved from https://www.prc.gov.ph
  22. Raagas, D. L. (2020). The Pedagogical Content Knowledge of the School of Education Pre-Service Teachers in Test Construction. JPAIR Institutional Research, 14(1), 74-86.
  23. Roberts, J., & Wang, T. (2022). Academic preparation and its correlation with licensure exam outcomes: A global perspective. Education in Health Professions, 11(3), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.5678/edhprof.2022.123
  24. Roberts, T., & Williams, M. (2019). Test anxiety and licensure exams: Strategies for students and educators. Educational Psychology Research, 14(4), 85–100.
  25. Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2023). Knowledge decay and retrieval practice: Implications for professional licensure exams. Memory and Cognition, 48(5), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1086/memory.2023.109
  26. Santos, J. M. (2023). The evolution of licensure examinations in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Professional Practice, 11(2), 12–25.
  27. Smith, L., & Johnson, T. (2023). The critical role of foundational knowledge in professional licensure exams. Pharmacy Education Review, 19(2), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.5678/pharmedrev.2023.19.2.34
  28. Valencerina, M. A. B. (2013). Effect of Cooperative Learning Method Anchored on Multiple Intelligence Theory on Students’ Achievement in Mathematics. JPAIR Institutional Research, 2(1), 56.
  29. World Health Organization. (2023). Competency-based education for health professionals. Retrieved from https://www.who.int
  30. Zhao, P., & Huang, Y. (2024). Strategies for improving resilience and focus among healthcare graduates in licensure exams. Journal of Professional Development in Healthcare, 20(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.2345/jpdh.2024.20.1.22
  31. Zhao, Y., & Chen, L. (2024). Cognitive skills training for professional licensure success. Cognitive Science Journal, 15(3), 143–159.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic