Development and Validation of Strategic Intervention Materials (SIM) in Mathematics
Cheryl Asia
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
This study explores the impact of Strategic Intervention Materials (SIM) on Grade 8
students’ understanding of Triangle Congruence. Conducted during the 2015–2016
school year at a public high school, the research specifically targets this challenging
mathematical concept to determine if specialized materials can effectively bridge
learning gaps. The topic was chosen because it was one of the most challenging
areas for students, based on the Secondary Learning Competencies for the fourth
grading period. The researchers implemented a pre-test and post-test approach to
measure the impact of the SIM on student achievement. This evaluation included
a diverse group of participants: 40 students, 13 Mathematics teachers, and a
division supervisor, ensuring a comprehensive view of the material’s effectiveness.
Statistical analysis revealed a significant improvement in student performance
following the intervention. Statistical analysis revealed a clear improvement in
performance following the use of SIM. Prior to the intervention, most students
(46%) were rated at the “Fair” level, with only 10% reaching the “Very Satisfactory”
level. Following the intervention, student achievement shifted significantly: 41%
reached the “Satisfactory” level, while the “Very Satisfactory” and “Excellent”
categories increased to 15% and 5%, respectively. Notably, the number of students
in the “Poor” category decreased from five students in the pre-test to only one
student in the post-test. This upward trend is statistically supported by the mean
scores, which rose from 7.87 to 13.82, representing a positive mean gain of 5.95
points. Statistical analysis confirmed a significant difference between these scores,
as the computed exceeds the tabular value of 1.96 at the 0.05 level of significance.
Consequently, the null hypothesis is rejected. These results demonstrate that
SIM effectively enhanced student understanding and academic performance in
Mathematics by successfully addressing existing learning gaps. Teachers also
gave positive feedback, noting that the SIM’s structure guide, activity, assessment, enrichment, and reference cards were not only effective for this topic but could also
be adapted for other lessons. Students and teachers shared helpful suggestions
for improving the material. Based on what was learned, the study encourages the
continued use and refinement of SIM to close learning gaps and to support different
types of learners more effectively.
References:
- Amor, A. (2007, December). Strategic intervention in English for high school students: Strategic intervention as venue for enhancement.
- Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is—or might be—the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-14. https://edr.sagepub.com/content/vol25/issue9/
- Barredo, K. B. (2014). Development and validation of strategic intervention materials (SIM) in biology [Master’s thesis, Manuel L. Quezon University]. MLQU Digital Archives. https://www.scribd.com/document/354817452/Development-and-Validation-of-Strategic-InterventionMaterial-SIM-in-Biology
- Barredo, K. J. D. A. (n.d.). Development on the academic performance in science using strategic intervention material [Unpublished manuscript]. Tunasan Elementary School, Muntinlupa City.
- Clayton County Public Schools. (2015). Effective teaching strategies and tools.
- Condor, G. (2002). Cooperative learning in the secondary mathematics classroom: Discussion, theory, and contemporary research.
- De Juan, M. (2015). Development and validation of strategic intervention materials in teaching English I [Unpublished undergraduate thesis].
- Dy, J. (2014). Strategic intervention materials (SIM) in teaching Science IV (Physics): Its effectiveness. Department of Education.
- Knoff, H. M. (2012). School discipline, classroom management, and student self-management: A PBS implementation guide.
- Pierangelo, R., & Giuliani, G. A. (2008). Frequently asked questions about response to intervention: A step-by-step guide to education.
- Ramm, L. (2006). The impact of the use of printed instructional materials with native language support on immigrant students’ performance in high school mathematics [Master’s thesis, Irkutsk State Linguistic University]. ISLU Digital Repository. http://islu.ru/en/library/theses/ramm2006-impact-materials
- Rodrigo, L. (2015, October 21). Importance of strategic intervention materials. Udyong: DepEd Bataan Teachers’ Corner. http://udyong.gov.ph/teachers-corner/6925importance-of-strategic-intervention-materials
- Salviejo, M. A., Aranes, A. E., & Espinosa, A. A. (2014). Strategic intervention material-based instruction, learning approach and students’ performance in chemistry. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 2, 1-18.
- Sevilla, C. O. (1996). The research method. Rex Bookstore.
- Swanson, H. L. (1999). Instructional components that predict treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities: Support for a combined strategy and direct instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14(3), 129-140.
- Wilson, J. W. (1996). Meaningful mathematics instruction. Mathematics Teacher, 89(5), 346–348. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.89.5.0346
ISSN 2980-4728 (Online)
ISSN 0117-3294 (Print)