Home⇛WVSU Research Journal⇛vol. 14 no. 2 (2025)

Knowledge Reception and Verification in COVID-19 Socio-scientific Choice-Making: A Grounded Theory Among Grade 10 Learners in a Rural Community in the Philippines

Jed Henry S. Lacorte | Peter Ernie Paris

Discipline: health studies

 

Abstract:

Socio-scientific issues are complex, ill-structured, and open-ended, often lacking definitive solutions. Managing the COVID-19 pandemic required practical decisions that guided interventions to promote health-enhancing behaviors. Effective decision-making in such contexts involves integrating knowledge from diverse sources, yet challenges remain in how knowledge is received and verified during crises. This grounded theory research examined knowledge reception and verification as critical processes in socio-scientific decision-making. Twenty-five informants were purposefully selected for interviews, drawing activities, and field observations. Data collection followed Hennink and Kaiser’s (2022) steps to achieve theoretical saturation, employing code frequency counts, comparative methods, stopping criteria, higher-order groupings, and code meanings. Findings revealed that knowledge reception occurred through auditory and visual senses, including problem-situation knowledge from social media, self-care knowledge from families, political and economic knowledge from local government, experiential knowledge from communities, and conceptual knowledge from schools. Verification of knowledge involved assessing source referents and comparing multiple sources. Received knowledge also triggered emotional responses that influenced decision-making. From these categories, the Theory on Knowledge Reception and Verification in Socio-scientific Decision-Making was developed. While limited by the characteristics of its informants, setting, and the COVID-19 context, the study contributes context-specific explanations of decision-making within a rural Filipino community. It highlights how contextual, cultural, and emotional factors shape responses to crises, offering an interdisciplinary framework rarely described by other decision-making theories. Future research may expand this framework by examining how communities in varying contexts receive and verify knowledge, informing localized responses during uncertainty.



References:

  1. Afifah, U. (2023). Rationalism in philosophical studies. Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Instructional Media, 4(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.52690/jitim.v4i1.730
  2. Alampay, L. P. (2024). Cultural values, parenting and child adjustment in the Philippines. International Journal of Psychology, 59(4), 568–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.13117
  3. Alvi, J., & Rehan, N. M. (2022). Role of senses in the construction of knowledge. Global Journal of Business Economics and Management Current Issues, 12(1), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjbem.v12i1.5780
  4. Anzaldo, G. D. (2021). Modular distance learning in the new normal education amidst covid-19. International Journal Of Scientific Advances, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.51542/ijscia.v2i3.6
  5. Ayala, E., Fuertes, W., & Jarrin, F. (2024). Critical thinking skills in research process, a literature review. an input to propose a new measurement instrument to gauge critical thinking. International Journal of Religion, 5(11), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.61707/pwy5df19
  6. Bass, S. B. (2020). “why don’t they just do what we tell them?” risk communication in the time of covid-19. CommonHealth, 1(3), 157–159. https://doi.org/10.15367/ch.v1i3.415
  7. Berawi, M. A. (2020). Empowering healthcare, economic, and social resilience during global pandemic covid-19. International Journal of Technology, 11(3), 436. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v11i3.4200
  8. Berger, J. (2025). What gets shared, and why? Interpersonal Communication and word of mouth. Annual Review of Psychology, 76(1), 559–581. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-013024-031524
  9. Best, A. L., Fletcher, F. E., Kadono, M., & Warren, R. C. (2021). Institutional distrust among African Americans and building trustworthiness in the COVID-19 response: Implications for ethical public health practice. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 32(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2021.0010
  10. Bratianu, C., Vătămănescu, E.-M., Anagnoste, S., & Dominici, G. (2020). Untangling knowledge fields and knowledge dynamics within the decision-making process. Management Decision, 59(2), 306–323. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-05-2019-0559
  11. Cavazza, N., & Roccato, M. (2024). Personal experiences with the National Healthcare System and Institutional Trust in times of COVID‐19. Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.13029
  12. Cebesoy, U. B., & Rundgren, S. C. (2021). Embracing socioscientific issues-based teaching and decision-making in teacher professional development. Educational Review, 75(3), 507–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1931037
  13. Chai, J., Weng, Z., & Liu, W. (2021). Behavioral Decision making in Normative and Descriptive Views: A Critical Review of literature. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(10), 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14100490
  14. Chhachhar, A. R., Nizamani, M. Q., & Ali, M. (2023). Challenging times of covid-19 pandemic: Social Media Infodemic. Journal of Journalism, Media Science & Creative Arts, 3(1), 198–217. https://doi.org/10.56596/jjmsca.v3i1.61
  15. Conlon, C., Timonen, V., Elliott-O’Dare, C., O’Keeffe, S., & Foley, G. (2020). Confused about theoretical sampling? Engaging theoretical sampling in diverse grounded theory studies. Qualitative Health Research, 30(6), 947–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319899139
  16. Corwin, Z. B., & Clemens, R. F. (2020). Analyzing fieldnotes: A practical guide. Handbook of Qualitative Research in Education. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788977159.00047
  17. Coşkun, K. (2020). A new explanation for the conflict between Constructivist and Objectivist grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920938280
  18. Crivelli, D., Acconito, C., & Balconi, M. (2024). Emotional and cognitive “route” In decision-making process: The relationship between executive functions, psychophysiological correlates, decisional styles, and personality. Brain Sciences, 14(7), 734. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14070734
  19. Dang, H. L. (2021). Social Media, Fake News, and the COVID-19 Pandemic: Sketching the case of Southeast Asia. Advances in Southeast Asian Studies, 14(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-0054
  20. Del Castillo, F. (2023). Pakikipagkapwa-tao as a mode of inter-religious dialogue in the contemporary Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 79(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v79i1.8015
  21. Diesen, G. (2022). Source credibility: Creating experts to herd the masses. Russophobia, 83–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1468-3_4
  22. Dimitrov, B. (2021). The axioms in my understanding from many years of experience. Axioms, 10(3), 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10030176
  23. Dix, A., Gill, S., Hare, J., & Ramduny-Ellis, D. (2022). Body and mind. In Oxford University Press eBooks (pp. 89–111). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198718581.003.0005
  24. Ecker, U. K., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N., Kendeou, P., Vraga, E. K., & Amazeen, M. A. (2022). The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y
  25. Fei, D. (2020). From ‘the mind isolated with the body’ to ‘the mind being embodied’: Contemporary approaches to the philosophy of the body. Cultures of Science, 3(3), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096608320960242
  26. Finley, S., & Howard, A. (2024). Does grounded theory have a place in graduate research? American Journal of Qualitative Research, 8(3), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/14889
  27. Foley, G., Timonen, V., Conlon, C., & O’Dare, C. E. (2021b). Interviewing as a vehicle for theoretical sampling in grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920980957
  28. Galang, J. R. F., Gopez, J. M. W., Gozum, I. E. A., & Sarmiento, P. J. D. (2021). Social distancing as a recontextualization of Filipino values and Catholic religious practices: A response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Religion and Health, 60(5), 3245–3264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01361-z
  29. Gans-Combe, C. (2022). Trust in institutions or the scientist? the drivers and mechanisms of trust in research and innovation as a means to improve related political outcomes. Ethical Evidence and Policymaking, 56–85. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447363972.ch003
  30. Godbout, P. (2023). Situation awareness: A pivotal process for sensemaking and decision making in the learning and practice of physical activities. Athens Journal of Sports, 10(3), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajspo.10-3-3
  31. González-Padilla, D. A., & Tortolero-Blanco, L. (2020). Social media influence in the COVID-19 pandemic. International Braz j Urol, 46(suppl 1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.s121
  32. Hennink, M., and Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science and Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
  33. Ismail, N. (2023). Power relations in changing the culture of the community power relations in changing the culture of society. INFERENSI Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 17(2), 281–304. https://doi.org/10.18326/infsl3.v17i2.281-304
  34. Israelashvili, J. (2021). More positive emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic are associated with better resilience, especially for those experiencing more negative emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648112
  35. Kim, J. W., Lee, J., & Dai, Y. (2023). Misinformation and the paradox of trust during the covid-19 pandemic in the U.S.: Pathways to risk perception and compliance behaviors. Journal of Risk Research, 26(5), 469–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2023.2176910
  36. Kisa, S., & Kisa, A. (2024). A comprehensive analysis of COVID-19 misinformation, public health impacts and communication strategies: A scoping review (Preprint). Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/56931
  37. Kumar, B. V., & Shailaja, N. (2024). Social Exchange Theory: Exploring reciprocity, equity, and relationship management in diverse contexts. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i06.32850
  38. Lacorte, J. H. (2024). Knowledge and emotions in socioscientific decision making. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v2i4.367
  39. Lacorte, J. H. (2025). Characteristics of knowledge in socioscientific decision making. Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, 4(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.56556/jssms.v4i1.1135
  40. Lan, J. (2024). Emotional Influences on individual decision-making: A comprehensive literature review. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 49(1), 142–148. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/49/20231925
  41. Leblanc-Sirois, Y., Gagnon, M., & Blanchette, I. (2022). Affective states during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: Progression of intensity and relation with public health compliance behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.883995
  42. Lokesh, R., Sullivan, S., Calalo, J. A., Roth, A., Swanik, B., Carter, M. J., & Cashaback, J. G. (2022). Humans utilize sensory evidence of others’ intended action to make online decisions. Scientific Reports, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12662-y
  43. Loreau, M. (2023). Reunifying knowledge of body and mind. In Oxford University Press eBooks (pp. 113–122). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197628430.003.0010
  44. Majid, U., Wasim, A., Bakshi, S., & Truong, J. (2020). Knowledge, (mis-)conceptions, risk perception, and behavior change during pandemics: A scoping review of 149 studies. Public Understanding of Science, 29(8), 777–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520963365
  45. Martikainen, J., & Hakoköngäs, E. (2023). Drawing as a method of researching social representations. Qualitative Research, 23(4), 981-999. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211065165
  46. Medina, B. T., & Medina, M. C. (2023). The elderly in the Filipino family. Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research, 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1530-353520230000023016
  47. Montibeller, G., & Von Winterfeldt, D. (2024). Behavioral Decision Research: Descriptive and Prescriptive perspectives. In International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science (pp. 15–40). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44424-1_2
  48. Muthia, E., Reynaldhi, N., Margolang, P. A., & Syahputra, H. (2024). Peran Pengalaman dalam Pembentukan Pengetahuan: Perspektif Filsafat Empirisme. Mauriduna Journal of Islamic Studies, 5(2), 1009–1019. https://doi.org/10.37274/mauriduna.v5i2.1354
  49. Parcon, J. V. (2020). Istorya sa plasa: The Ilonggo plaza as a communication context. Philippine Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 25, 18–44. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/148673406.pdf.
  50. Pareek, S., & Goncalves, J. (2024). Peer-supplied credibility labels as an online misinformation intervention. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 188, 103276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103276
  51. Pedroso, J. E. (2021). Students’ views from webinars: A qualitative study. International Journal of Arts and Humanities Studies, 1(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijahs.2021.1.1.6
  52. Pedroso, J. E., Tubola, L. F., & Aquidado, E. J. (2023). Facebook Messenger: As means of communication for academic inquiries. Journal of Digital Learning And Distance Education, 2(2), 491–505. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v2i2.116
  53. Rabb, N., Geana, M., & Sloman, S. (2023). Communities of knowledge in trouble. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 19(2), 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916231187997
  54. Ribeiro, J. M., De Oliveira, E. S. F., & Gonçalves, R. F. L. (2021). Contexts of qualitative research in health. Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem, 74(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167.2021740101
  55. Rizma, N. S., & Dewi, N. E. (2024). Epistemologi : Rasionalisme, empirisme, kritisisme, pragmatisme positivisme dan positivisme logis. Sinar Dunia Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(1), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.58192/sidu.v3i1.1799
  56. Rodriguez, R. L., Padilla, J. R., Montefalcon, M. D., Abisado, M., & Raga, R. (2023). The post behind anonymity: A thematic discourse analysis of Facebook posts from confession pages in different Universities in the Philippines. In 2023 11th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET) (pp. 529–533). https://doi.org/10.1109/iciet56899.2023.10111104
  57. Saarimäki, H. (2021). Naturalistic stimuli in affective neuroimaging: A review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.675068
  58. Sarfo, J. O., Debrah, T. P., Gbordzoe, N. I., Afful, W. T., & Obeng, P. (2021). Qualitative research designs, sample size and saturation: Is enough always enough? Journal of Advocacy, Research, and Education, 8(3), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.13187/jare.2021.3.60
  59. Saroh, S. (2024). The philosophy of rationalist. Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Instructional Media, 4(3), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.52690/jitim.v4i3.782
  60. Sigauke, I., Swansi, K., & Tsvara, P. (2020). Scaling up grounded theory: Problems, implications and options for qualitative researchers. East African Journal of Education And Social Sciences, 1(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.46606/eajess2020v01i01.0007
  61. Sher, S., McKenzie, C. R., Müller-Trede, J., & Leong, L. (2022). Rational choice in context. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(6), 518–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221120387
  62. Szuster, A., Huflejt-Łukasik, M., Karwowska, D., Pastwa, M., Laszczkowska, Z., & Imbir, K. K. (2022). Affective attitudes in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic: The dynamics of negative emotions and a sense of threat in Poles in the first wave of the pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), 13497. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013497
  63. Talaoui, Y. (2023). The situation of incommensurability in strategic management. Symphonya Emerging Issues in Management, 1, 96–107. https://doi.org/10.4468/2023.01.06talaoui
  64. Thomas, H., & Earthy, S. (2023). Qualitative interviews. Encyclopedia of Health Research in the Social Sciences, 269–274. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800885691.ch49
  65. Uy, H. O. (2023). A cross-case analysis on filial care assumption among Filipino adults. Medical Research Archives, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v11i11.4605 
  66. Wang, S. (2023). Can different contexts affect memory recall? Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 8, 2214–2219. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.4679
  67. Williams, J. R. (2021). Publicity and common commitment to believe. Erkenntnis, 88(3), 1059–1080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-021-00393-x
  68. Yamao, S. (2024). Social exchange theory. In Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks (pp. 274–279). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035308767.ch35
  69. Yixuan, W. (2023). Cross-cultural comparison of family education in China and the west: A study centered on Ang Lee’s film trilogy. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 6(23). https://doi.org/10.25236/ajhss.2023.062311.
  70. Zheng, D. (2020). Building resident commitment through tourism consumption: A relational cohesion lens. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 16, 100441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100441

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic