Lexical Variation of the Cebuano Language
in Southeastern Philippines

Shiela May  R. Abucay,

Lexical Variation of the Cebuano Language in Southeastern Philippines

Abstract:

Language variation studies increasingly focus on lexical differences, emphasizing the uniqueness of language in specific areas. These variations, especially at the lexical level, highlight the uniqueness of a language in a specific area. This paper describes the lexical variation of Cebuano in Davao del Norte, Southeastern Mindanao, using descriptive and dialectological methods, along with lexicostatistics and dialect geography to determine the cognate percentage. Data were collected through interviews with 330 informants using a modified Swadesh 200-Word List. Results showed that Cebuano in Davao del Norte is a dialect of the same language, with a cognate range of 89.2% to 97.5%. There were 30 dispersed isogloss sets found within the province, and the lexical distribution can be categorized into four groups: AB-, AB+, AZ-, and AZ+. This indicates that the Cebuano language in Southeastern Mindanao particularly in Davao del Norte is a dialect of the broader Cebuano language, as it demonstrates high mutual intelligibility, even in distant areas. It can thus be classified under the L-simplex category according to dialect continua, where the variation occurring between regions does not disrupt other areas but runs parallel to each other. The findings of this research can advance linguistic theory, language preservation and documentation and language policy by providing insights into Cebuano’s variety, linguistic features, sociolinguistic contexts, and its potential for revitalization. This research could also influence curriculum development and language policy by considering Cebuano’s linguistic features, as well as future studies on language contact and comparative language analysis.

References:

Asuncion Municipality. (2020). Asuncion Municipality. Retrieved August 1, 2022, from https://asuncion-municipality.com
Braulio E. Dujali Municipality. (2025). Braulio E. Dujali Municipality. Retrieved August 3, 2022, from https://braulioedujali.gov.ph/
Cebuano Language. (2025). https://www.ethnologue.com/size-and-vitality/ceb
Census of Population in Davao Region 2020. (2022). Philippine Statistics Authority. Retrieved June 13, 2022, from http://rsso11.psa.gov.ph/2020-CPH
Chambers, C., & Trudgill, P. (1980). Dialectology. Cambridge University Press.
Crowley, T. (1997). Introduction to historical linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Eberhard, D. M., Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D. (2022). Ethnologue languages. https://archive.org/details/artedelalenguaze00enci_0
Endriga, D. A. P. (2009). The dialectology of Cebuano: Bohol, Cebu, and Davao (Master’s thesis). University of Asia and the Pacific.
Fajardo, M., et al. (2022). Dayalektolohiya ng Cebuano sa Iligan: Isang preliminaryong pag-aaral. Di-gradwadong tesis, MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology.
Gleason, H. A. (1963). An introduction to descriptive linguistics (Revised ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
IGACOS demographic profile. (n.d.). Retrieved September 13, 2022, from https://www.samalcity.gov.ph/
Kapalong Municipality. (2022). Kapalong Municipality. Retrieved September 13, 2022, from http://kapalong.gov.ph/
Labov, W. (2001). Principles of linguistic change: Social factors. Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
McFarland, C. (1981). Linguistic atlas of the Philippines. Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
McKaughan, H. (1964). A study of divergence in four New Guinea languages. American Anthropologist, 66(4, Part 2), 98–120.
Nerbonne, J., & Heeringa, W. (2009). Measuring dialect differences. https://www.academia.edu/2728540/Measuring_dialect_differences
Niedzielski, N. (1999). The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. https://journals.sagepub.com
Nuncio, R., et al. (2020). Pagsipat sa leksikal na baryasyon ng mga terminong Filipino, Bikol, at Cebuano sa kontekstong panginabuhian/pangkabuhayan. https://www.dlsu.edu.ph
Philippine Statistical Yearbook of 2019. (2019). Philippine Statistical Yearbook of 2019. Retrieved September 12, 2022, from https://psa.gov.ph
Reid, L. A. (1994). Subgrouping and number of the Philippine languages or how many Philippine languages are there? Philippine Journal of Linguistics, 25(1–2), 73–129. https://doi.org/10.2307/3623084
Schachter, P., & Otanes, F. T. (1972). Tagalog reference grammar. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520321205
Swadesh, M. (1952). Lexicostatistic dating of prehistoric ethnic contacts: With special reference to North American Indians and the Eskimo-Aleut languages. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 96(4), 171–180.
Thomas, D., & Healy, A. (1962). Some Philippine language subgroupings and reconstruction: A lexicostatistical study. Anthropological Linguistics, 4(1), 21–33.
Trudgill, P. (1988). The role of dialect contact and interdialect in linguistic change.
Weinreich, U. (1954). Is a structural dialectology possible? Word, 10(2–3), 388–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1954.11659597
Wolff, J. (1972). Dictionary of Cebuano Visayan. Cornell University, Southeast Asia Program and Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
Wolff, J. (2001). Facts about the world’s languages: An encyclopedia of the world’s major languages, past and present: Cebuano.
Zorc, R. D. P. (1977). The Bisayan dialects of the Philippines: Subgrouping and reconstruction. Pacific Linguistics.
Zorc, R. D. P., Lobel, J. W., & Hall, W. (2023). Historical linguistics of the Philippines. In The Oxford handbook of Austronesian linguistics (pp. 73–129). Oxford University Press.