Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 7 no. 4 (2026)

A Descriptive Study on the Effectiveness of the Scan-and-Learn Mobile Application in Enhancing Knowledge, Skills, and Engagement in Technical and Vocational Education

Shanyna Jade A. Tambio | Regie Boy B. Fabro

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study examines the effectiveness of the Scan-and-Learn Mobile App in enhancing Grade 7 students' learning outcomes in Technical and Vocational Education (TVE), focusing on their knowledge and skills re- lated to kitchen tools and equipment. The research addresses the chal- lenge of limited access to physical resources in schools by exploring how mobile learning technology can support teaching and learning in resource-constrained environments. Using descriptive research meth- ods, data were collected from 71 student respondents through surveys that included both closed-ended and open-ended questions. The re- sponses were analyzed using weighted means to evaluate the app's im- pact across five components: knowledge, skills, engagement and moti- vation, perceived usefulness, and satisfaction. The findings reveal that the app significantly improves students' knowledge and understanding of kitchen tools, as well as their practical skills in operating kitchen equipment. Students report high levels of engagement and motivation, emphasizing the app's interactive features, such as step-by-step in- structional videos and scanning tools, as key factors in making learning enjoyable and effective. The app is also perceived as a highly useful sup- plementary tool for reinforcing classroom learning, providing quick ac- cess to information, and fostering independent study. However, the study notes that while the app enhances understanding and skill devel- opment, hands-on practice is essential to further improve students' ability to apply their skills accurately in real-world scenarios. The study concludes that the Scan-and-Learn Mobile App is a valuable educational resource, particularly for public schools with limited access to physical resources, as it provides an innovative and cost-effective solution for improving TVE learning outcomes. Future research is recommended to investigate the long-term retention of knowledge gained through the app and to explore its application in other areas of TVE. *Corresponding author: E-mail: antoniolimrodil@gmail.com Tambio & Fabro, 2026 / A Descriptive Study on the Effectiveness of the Scan-and-Learn Mobile Application IJMABER 1709 Volume 7 | Number 4 | April | 2026



References:

  1. Arxer, S. L. (2025). The role of community‑en‑gaged qualitative research in urban governance: Enhancing public management and policy outcomes. In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer. https://link.springer.com/rwe/10.1007/978‑3‑319‑31816‑5_4486‑1">https://link.springer.com/rwe/10.1007/978_x001E_3_x001E_319_x001E_31816_x001E_5_4486_x001E_1">https://link.springer.com/rwe/10.1007/978‑3‑319‑31816‑5_4486‑1
  2. Asmawi, A., & Alam, M. S. (2024). Qualitative re-search: Understanding its underlying philosophies.Forum for Education Studies, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.59400/fes.v2i2.1320">https://doi.org/10.59400/fes.v2i2.1320">https://doi.org/10.59400/fes.v2i2.1320
  3. Astaneh, B., & Masoumi, S. (2018). From paper to practice: Indexing systems and ethical standards. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24, 647–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948‑017‑9899‑x">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948_x001E_017_x001E_9899_x001E_x">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948‑017‑9899‑x
  4. Bergsteedt, B., & du Plessis, A. (2025). Reimagining transformation through strategic thinking and accountable governance in the South African public university sys‑tem. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734‑025‑01517‑w">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734_x001E_025_x001E_01517_x001E_w">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734‑025‑01517‑w
  5. Bozalek, V., & Zembylas, M. (2025). Psychology, the posts, and qualitative research.Qualitative Research in Psychology, 22(3), 708–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2024.2425716">https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2024.2425716">https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2024.2425716
  6. Carta, J. J., Wills, H., Greenwood, C. R., Beecher, C., Bowman‑Perrott, L., & Lee, J. D. (2025). Nurturing the next generation of community‑engaged researcher leaders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. https://link.springer.com/con‑tent/pdf/10.1007/s43494‑025‑00164‑1.pdf">https://link.springer.com/con_x001E_tent/pdf/10.1007/s43494_x001E_025_x001E_00164_x001E_1.pdf">https://link.springer.com/con‑tent/pdf/10.1007/s43494‑025‑00164‑1.pdf
  7. Crede , M., & Harms, P. D. (2021). Three cheers for descriptive statistics—and five more reasons why they matter. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 14(4), 486–488. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2021.110">https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2021.110">https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2021.110
  8. Currier, J. M., Drescher, K. D., & Harris, J. I. (2015). Spiritual functioning among veterans seeking residential treatment for PTSD: A matched control group study. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 7(3), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000019">https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000019">https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000019
  9. Dagli, G., Altinay, F., & Altinay, Z. (2025). Education for sustainable development: Challenges and opportunities of transformative learning and teaching. Sustainability, 17(6), 2440. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062440">https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062440">https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062440
  10. Elliott, R., & Timulak, L. (2021). Essentials of descriptive-interpretive qualitative research: A generic approach. American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/es‑sentials‑descriptive‑interpretive‑qualita‑tive‑researchElsevier. (n.d.). Pure Impact AI: Evidence-based impact narratives, informed by responsible AI.
  11. Elsevier. https://www.else‑vier.com/en‑gb/products/pure/impact‑ai">https://www.else_x001E_vier.com/en_x001E_gb/products/pure/impact_x001E_ai">https://www.else‑vier.com/en‑gb/products/pure/impact‑ai
  12. Gagliardi, A. R., Berta, W., Kothari, A., Boyko, J., & Urquhart, R. (2017). Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health systems: A scoping review. Implementation Science, 12(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012‑017‑0696‑3">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012_x001E_017_x001E_0696_x001E_3">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012‑017‑0696‑3
  13. Grund, J., Singer‑Brodowski, M., & Bu ssing, A. G. (2023). Emotions and transformative learning for sustainability: A systematic review. Sustainability Science, 19, 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625‑023‑01439‑5">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625_x001E_023_x001E_01439_x001E_5">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625‑023‑01439‑5
  14. Horcea‑Milcu, A.‑I., Dorresteijn, I., Leventon, J., Stojanovic, M., Lam, D. P. M., Lang, D. J., Moriggi, A., Raymond, C. M., Sta lhammar, S., Weiser, A., & Zimmermann, S. (2024). Transformative research for sustainability: characteristics, tensions, and moving forward. Global Sustainability,7, e14. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2024.12">https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2024.12">https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2024.12
  15. Huynh, T. (2022). Reinforcing reflective practice through reflective writing in higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(6), 1–18. https://ijlter.myres.net/in‑dex.php/ijlter/article/view/1959">https://ijlter.myres.net/in_x001E_dex.php/ijlter/article/view/1959">https://ijlter.myres.net/in‑dex.php/ijlter/article/view/1959
  16. Intorsureanu, I., Oprea, S.‑V., Ba ra, A., & Vespan, D. (2025). Generative AI in education: Perspectives through an academic lens. Elec-tronics, 14(5), 1053. https://doi.org/10.3390/electron‑ics14051053">https://doi.org/10.3390/electron_x001E_ics14051053">https://doi.org/10.3390/electron‑ics14051053
  17. Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The Action Research Planner: Doing Criti-cal Participatory Action Research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‑981‑4560‑67‑2">https://doi.org/10.1007/978_x001E_981_x001E_4560_x001E_67_x001E_2">https://doi.org/10.1007/978‑981‑4560‑67‑2
  18. Liang, Y., & Zhang, L. J. (2025). The relative effects of input‑and output‑based instruction on the development of L2 knowledge and the relationships with individual differences in working memory. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 10(34). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862‑025‑00343‑y">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862_x001E_025_x001E_00343_x001E_y">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862‑025‑00343‑y
  19. Lim, W. M. (2024). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619">https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619">https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
  20. Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research(4th ed., pp. 97–128). Sage Publications. https://mi‑guelangelmartinez.net/IMG/pdf/2018_denzin_lincoln_handbook_qualitative_re‑search‑213‑263.pdf">https://mi_x001E_guelangelmartinez.net/IMG/pdf/2018_denzin_lincoln_handbook_qualitative_re_x001E_search_x001E_213_x001E_263.pdf">https://mi‑guelangelmartinez.net/IMG/pdf/2018_denzin_lincoln_handbook_qualitative_re‑search‑213‑263.pdf
  21. Lubbe, S., & Botha, J. (2020). Building conscious awareness through reflective practice in education. University of East London Re-search Repository. https://reposi‑tory.uel.ac.uk/item/8x371">https://reposi_x001E_tory.uel.ac.uk/item/8x371">https://reposi‑tory.uel.ac.uk/item/8x371
  22. Magnusson, E., & Marecek, J. (2015). Doing interview-based qualitative research: A learner’s guide. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107449893">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107449893">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107449893
  23. Matta, C. (2022). Philosophical paradigms in qualitative research methods education: What is their pedagogical role?Scandina‑vian Journal of Educational Research, 66(6), 1049–1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1958372">https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1958372">https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1958372
  24. Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Trans‑formative‑Research‑and‑Evalua‑tion/Donna‑Mertens/9781593853020">https://www.guilford.com/books/Trans_x001E_formative_x001E_Research_x001E_and_x001E_Evalua_x001E_tion/Donna_x001E_Mertens/9781593853020">https://www.guilford.com/books/Trans‑formative‑Research‑and‑Evalua‑tion/Donna‑Mertens/9781593853020
  25. Misa. (2025, June 17). Descriptive research: Key features, approaches, and real‑world applications. ResearchMate. https://re‑searchmate.net/descriptive‑research/">https://re_x001E_searchmate.net/descriptive_x001E_research/">https://re‑searchmate.net/descriptive‑research/
  26. Mohamed, M., Ab Rashid, R., & Alqaryouti, M. H. (2022). Conceptualizing the complexity of reflective practice in education. Frontiersin Psychology, 13, Article 1008234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1008234">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1008234">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1008234
  27. Moriggi, A. (2021). An ethos and practice of appreciation for transformative research: Apreciative inquiry, care ethics, and creative methods. In Co-Creativity and Engaged Scholarship (pp. 131–164). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chap‑ter/10.1007/978‑3‑030‑84248‑2_5">https://link.springer.com/chap_x001E_ter/10.1007/978_x001E_3_x001E_030_x001E_84248_x001E_2_5">https://link.springer.com/chap‑ter/10.1007/978‑3‑030‑84248‑2_5
  28. Narsico, P. G. (2024). A Perspective‑Changing Teaching Experience in Araimiri. Intern-tional Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research. 5(3), 993 –1007. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma‑ber.05.03.22">https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma_x001E_ber.05.03.22">https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma‑ber.05.03.22
  29. Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747">https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747">https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747
  30. Pilcher, N., & Cortazzi, M. (2023). 'Qualitative' and 'quantitative' methods and approaches across subject fields: Implications for research values, assumptions, and practices. Quality & Quantity, 58, 2357–2387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135‑023‑01734‑4">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135_x001E_023_x001E_01734_x001E_4">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135‑023‑01734‑4
  31. Ramírez Correa, P. E., Mariano, C. M., & Santos, M. C. (2025). Digital and sustainable education and social inclusion: A bibliometric review. Sustainability, 17(13), 5677. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135677">https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135677">https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135677
  32. Rogers, B. (1998). Descriptive analysis of re‑search data. AAOHN Journal, 46(5), 266–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/216507999804600507">https://doi.org/10.1177/216507999804600507">https://doi.org/10.1177/216507999804600507
  33. Sathyanarayana, S., & Mohanasundaram, T. (2025). Standardized reporting of statistical results in APA format: Enhancing clarity, transparency, and reproducibility in research. Asian Journal of Advanced Re-search and Reports, 19(2), 208–226. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2025/v19i2903">https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2025/v19i2903">https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2025/v19i2903
  34. Savage, C., & Ikoma, S. (2023). Access to civics content and evidence-based instructional approaches in U.S. schools (AIR‑NAEP Working Paper #2023‑07). American Institutes for Research. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED638661.pdf">https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED638661.pdf">https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED638661.pdf
  35. Schneidewind, U., & Singer‑Brodowski, M. (2013). Testing the quality of transformtive science methods: The example of Hu‑man Scale Development. Sustainability Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625‑021‑00966‑3">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625_x001E_021_x001E_00966_x001E_3">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625‑021‑00966‑3
  36. Shidiq, M. S., Maksum, M. N. R., & Narimo, S. (2024). Bibliometric Investigation of Development and Research Trends in Trans-formative Education. ISETH Proceedings. https://proceedings.ums.ac.id/iseth/arti‑cle/view/3845">https://proceedings.ums.ac.id/iseth/arti_x001E_cle/view/3845">https://proceedings.ums.ac.id/iseth/arti‑cle/view/3845
  37. Smith, J. A., & Nizza, I. E. (2022). Essentials of in-terpretative phenomenological analysis. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000259‑000">https://doi.org/10.1037/0000259_x001E_000">https://doi.org/10.1037/0000259‑000
  38. St. Pierre, E. A. (2011). Post qualitative re‑search: The critique and the coming after. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research(4th ed., pp. 611–626). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419863005">https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419863005">https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419863005
  39. St. Pierre, E. A. (2023). Poststructuralism and post qualitative inquiry: What can and must be thought. Qualitative Inquiry, 29(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004221122282">https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004221122282">https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004221122282
  40. Sugito, S. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of transformative learning research: Trends and developments from 1992 to 2023. Co-gent Education, 11(1), Article 2411092. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2411092">https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2411092">https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2411092
  41. Thelwall, M., & Pinfield, S. (2024). The accuracy of field classifications for journals in Sco-pus. Scientometrics. https://link.springer.com/arti‑cle/10.1007/s11192‑023‑04901‑4">https://link.springer.com/arti_x001E_cle/10.1007/s11192_x001E_023_x001E_04901_x001E_4">https://link.springer.com/arti‑cle/10.1007/s11192‑023‑04901‑4
  42. UChicago Consortium. (n.d.). Understanding the Limitations of Descriptive Research and Data. https://toandthrough.uchi‑cago.edu/news/understanding‑limita‑tions‑descriptive‑research‑and‑data">https://toandthrough.uchi_x001E_cago.edu/news/understanding_x001E_limita_x001E_tions_x001E_descriptive_x001E_research_x001E_and_x001E_data">https://toandthrough.uchi‑cago.edu/news/understanding‑limita‑tions‑descriptive‑research‑and‑data
  43. Varela‑Losada, M., Pe rez‑Rodrí guez, U., Lo‑renzo‑Rial, M. A., & Vega‑Marcote, P. (2022). In search of transformative learning for sustainable development: Biblio‑metric analysis of recent scientific production. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 786560. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.786560">https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.786560">https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.786560
  44. Vianna, E., & Podlucka , D. (2021). The ethics of affects in transformative activist qualitative research: Struggle and solidarity in collaborative inquiry. Qualitative Research and Social Intervention. https://www.aca‑demia.edu/121204970/THE_ETHICS_OF_AFFECTS_IN_TRANSFORMA‑TIVE_ACTIVIST_QUALITATIVE_RE‑SEARCH_Struggle_and_Solidarity_in_Col‑laborative_Inquiry">https://www.aca_x001E_demia.edu/121204970/THE_ETHICS_OF_AFFECTS_IN_TRANSFORMA_x001E_TIVE_ACTIVIST_QUALITATIVE_RE_x001E_SEARCH_Struggle_and_Solidarity_in_Col_x001E_laborative_Inquiry">https://www.aca‑demia.edu/121204970/THE_ETHICS_OF_AFFECTS_IN_TRANSFORMA‑TIVE_ACTIVIST_QUALITATIVE_RE‑SEARCH_Struggle_and_Solidarity_in_Col‑laborative_Inquiry
  45. Xiaoyu, W., Zainuddin, Z., & Hai Leng, C. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in pedagogical practices: A systematic review of empirical studies (2022–2024). Cogent Education, 12(1), 2485499. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2485499">https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2485499">https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2485499
  46. Yolanda, E., & Rifani, A. (2024). Bridging transformational leadership and sustainability in higher education: A systematic literature review. Asian Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship and Social Science, 4(2), 1347–1372. https://www.aj‑mesc.com/index.php/ajmesc/arti‑cle/view/1347

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic