HomeAdvanced Social Science in Research Journalvol. 1 no. 2 (2026)

Utilization of Sexual Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) Information and Services in Selected Municipalities of Masbate and Sorsogon

Jose Lavapie

Discipline: health studies

 

Abstract:

The SHE Project on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) implemented by MIDAS was assessed in its utilization in selected municipalities of Masbate and Sorsogon. The baseline data shows the following: household size – 5, number of children – 4, marital status – 47% are married, range of age – 34.5, regular income – Php 84,063 in 2019 and 106,544.12 in 2023, consent of partner to engage in SRHR – 87.1, support of partner to modern methods – 77.04% -2019 and 77.34 -2023, family planning methods availed – pills for 2019 and sterilization for 2023. Beneficiaries report high awareness and satisfaction in the survey and the focus group discussion; this supports the data that beneficiaries availed a mean of 6.28 training and advocacies and a mean of 2.1 years of engagement to the SHE project. Peer educators played an important role in the implementation of the project, with a mean of 19 reach per peer educator. Training (40.94), counseling (29.24), and coaching (19.30) are the activities that beneficiaries engaged in. The study recommends prioritizing interventions that promote family planning, expanding women’s participation in advocacy and policy formulation, tailoring program interventions to address the specific needs of different age groups, expanding men’s activities, increasing youth participation, addressing barriers to participation, combating gender-based violence, providing comprehensive and accessible healthcare services to prevent and manage HIV and STI issues, and continuous monitoring and evaluation of the program’s effectiveness. By addressing these recommendations, MIDAS will be much more successful in the SHE project on SRHR. It will help ensure that the participants are fully engaged in the activities and that MIDAS provides the services best suited to their needs and preferences.



References:

  1. Adler, N. E., & Stewart, J. (2010). Socioeconomic status and health: A review of the literature. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 1–30.
  2. Anand, T., et al. (2018). Debunking myths around HIV and AIDS: A literature review. AIDS Research and Treatment, 2018, 1–10.
  3. Bonomi, A. E., et al. (2018). Tailored interventions to address intimate partner violence among African American women. Journal of Women’s Health, 27(5), 642–651.
  4. Deogan, C., et al. (2020). Youth-friendly sexual and reproductive health services in low and middle income countries: A systematic review. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 1–15.
  5. Heise, L., et al. (2018). The intersection of economic and gender-based violence: Implications for policy and practice. Health Policy and Planning, 33(1), 1–12.
  6. International Center for Research on Women. (2016). Gender-based violence and women’s economic empowerment: Exploring the links. https://www.icrw.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Gender-Based-Violence-and-Womens-Economic-Empowerment-Exploring-the-Links.pdf
  7. O’Campo, P., et al. (2019). The effectiveness of interventions targeting the economic and social empowerment of women who experience intimate partner violence: A systematic review. Global Health Action, 12(1), 1–19.
  8. Philippine Statistics Authority. (n.d.). [Title of the specific report or page]. https://psa.gov.ph/poverty-press-releases/nid/167972
  9. Shah, N., et al. (2019). Factors associated with male support for family planning in Nepal. BMC International Health and Human Rights, 19(1), 1–10.