Home⇛JPAIR Institutional Research Journal⇛vol. 23 no. 2 (2024)

Project Competency and Performance Recovery (CPR) and Students’ Level of Performance in Technology and Livelihood Education

Evelyn Sublay

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to investigate the effectivenessof Project Competency and Performance Recovery(CPR) using quantitative research, specifically theone-group pretest-post-test design. The researchstudy was conducted in Palo Alto IntegratedSchool, where one-hundred twenty (120)respondents were included from Grades 7 – 10,respectively. The mean, standard deviation andpaired t-test were used to examine the results of thelearners’ academic performance from the secondquarter and third quarter. The study’s findings revealed that at the reopening ofclasses, the mean academic performance of learners from grades 7 – 10 was atthe ’developing’ stage. This was before the implementation of Project CPR. Onthe other hand, after the implementation, there was a slight improvement in thelearners’ mean academic performance, particularly from grades 8 and 10, whichimproved from “developing” to “Approaching Proficiency”. Only grade 7 learnershave not improved after the implementation of the project since it is statistically  evident that there is no significant difference between the results of the secondquarter and the third quarter’s performance. Moreover, findings also show thatProject CPR was effective in recovering learning losses. The data for the test ofsignificant difference between the second and third quarters revealed a significantdifference, particularly from grades 8, 9, and 10. The study’s conclusive findingswill serve as the foundation for replication with a larger sample size and a broaderfocus.



References:

  1. Adeniran, A., Okoye, D., Yedomiffi, M. P., & Wantchekon, L. (2022). COVID-19 learning losses, parental investments, and recovery: evidence from low-cost private schools in Nigeria. RISE Working Paper Series 22/120.
  2. Ancheta, R. F., & Ancheta, H. B. (2020). The new normal in education: A challenge to the private basic education institutions in the philippines?. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 1(1), 1-19.
  3. Agaton, C. B., & Cueto, L. J. (2021). Learning at Home: Parents’ Lived Experiences on Distance Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic in the Philippines. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(3), 901-911.
  4. Angrist, N., Bergman, P., & Matsheng, M. (2020). School’s out: Experimental evidence on limiting learning loss using “low-tech” in a pandemic (No. w28205). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  5. No, D. O. (12). Series 2020 “Adoption of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan for School Year 2020–2021 in light of the Covid–19 Public Health Emergency”. Department of Education.
  6. Ganar, I. C. (2021). Implementation of the School Learning Continuity Plan and Performance of Grade 9 Students in Araling Panlipunan.
  7. Go, J. L., & Pecajas, R. M. (2022). Philippine learning continuity plan: a policy analysis in times of pandemic. Scientific Journal of Tan Trao University, 8(4).
  8. Hamoc, J. (2023). Learning Recovery: Teacher’s Strategies and Challenges. Available at SSRN 4833790.
  9. Jaurigue-Sublay, E. (2023). Lived Experiences of Technology and Livelihood Education Teachers on the Challenges and Benefits of Facilitating Online Learning. JPAIR Institutional Research, 20(1), 125-147.
  10. Ndaruhutse, S. (2021). Learning Loss, Learning Gains and Wellbeing: A Review of Policy and Grey Literature. Education Development Trust.
  11. Madrazo, A. L., & Dio, R. V. (2020). Contextualized Learning Modules in Bridging Students’ Learning Gaps in Calculus with Analytic Geometry through Independent Learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 457-476.
  12. Moscoviz, L., & Evans, D. K. (2022). Learning loss and student dropouts during the covid-19 pandemic: A review of the evidence two years after schools shut down.
  13. Ondras, L. B., & Alvero, J. (2023). Post-pandemic challenges in Addressing learning gaps: Experiences of teachers in public elementary and secondary schools. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 47(4), 38-46.
  14. Patrinos, H. A., Vegas, E., & Carter-Rau, R. (2022). An analysis of COVID-19 student learning loss.
  15. Pek, L. S., Nadarajan, N. T. M., Khusni, H., Mee, R. W. M., Ismail, M. R., Adha, N. S. Q. S., ... & Arma, J. (2024). Factors contributing to learning losses among primary school children: a scoping review. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(3), 840-847.
  16. Peregrino, L. P., Javillonar, M. G., Caballes, D. G., Necio, C. R., & Ramirez, A. B. (2022). Assessment of school Learning Continuity Plan (LCP) implementation: Basis for policy formulation. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 2(3), 211-224.
  17. Sabates, R., Carter, E., & Stern, J. M. (2021). Using educational transitions to estimate learning loss due to COVID-19 school closures: The case of Complementary Basic Education in Ghana. International Journal of Educational Development, 82, 102377.
  18. Singh, A., Romero, M., & Muralidharan, K. (2024). COVID-19 Learning loss and recovery: Panel data evidence from India. Journal of Human Resources.
  19. Torres, R. C. (2021). Addressing the learning gaps in the distance learning modalities. Int. J. Acad. Appl. Res, 5, 76-79.
  20. Zhdanov, S. P., Baranova, K. M., Udina, N., Terpugov, A. E., Lobanova, E. V., & Zakharova, O. V. (2022). Analysis of Learning Losses of Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(3).

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic