Home⇛Science and Technology Journal⇛vol. 3 no. 1 (2013)

Epistemological and Pedagogical Beliefs of Preservice Secondary Science Teachers on Global Climate Change

Aris Reynold V. Cajigal | Deborah J. Tippins

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Global climate change is a socioscientific issue that is popular in socio-political, economic, and educational contexts. This study explored the epistemological and pedagogical beliefs of preservice secondary science teachers on global climate change. Specifically, it examined the experiences of preservice teachers that informed their perspectives on the issue, and the negotiations they anticipate when developing this topic in their classrooms. Employing an interpretive research methodology, data were collected from four preservice secondary science teachers through case study methods, in-depth interviews, and written products. The analysis of data revealed that the preservice science teachers’ epistemological and pedagogical beliefs on global climate change were in a dynamic relationship and bound by two significant points: a) Global climate change is a seemingly inevitable topic and b) Global climate change has a rightful place in the science curriculum. Perspectives on global climate change were mediated by the preservice teachers’ experiences with people, places, and events. More specifically, themes that emerged from the four case narratives through within-case and cross-case analyses were identified. Among these include: a) natural versus anthropogenic causes; b) information audit; c) relevance of the topic of global climate change to the individual lives of students; d) influence from family and friends; e) controversy surrounding global climate change transcends the scientific, political, and economic aspects of society; and f) classroom debate as a microcosm of the larger scientific community. Recognizing the controversial nature of global climate change, the preservice teachers plan to negotiate the teaching of this concept in terms of content, context, process, and outcomes vis-à-vis the implications of the findings. Keywords: epistemological belief, pedagogical belief, climate change



References:

  1. Anderson, C.W. (2007). Perspectives on science learning. In S.K. Abell & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 3-30).Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  2. Barrett, S.E., and Nieswandt, M. (2010). Teaching about ethics through socioscientific issues in physics and chemistry: Teacher candidates’ beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 380-401.
  3. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  4. Cobern, W.W. (2000). The nature of science and the role of knowledge and belief. Science and Education, 9, 219-246.
  5. Demirkaya, H. (2008). The understanding of global warming and learning styles: A phenomenographic analysis of prospective primary school teachers. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 51-58.
  6. Dove, J. (1996). Student teacher understanding of the greenhouse effect, ozone ayer depletion and acid rain. Environmental Education Research, 2(1), 89-100.
  7. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA). (2010). Climate change. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/basicinfo.html, 14 February 2010.
  8. Forbes, C.T., and Davis, E.A. (2010). Beginning elementary teachers’ beliefs about the use of anchoring questions in science: A longitudinal study. Science Education, 94, 365-387.
  9. Freeley, A.J., and Steinberg, D.L. (2005). Argumentation and debate. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
  10. Groves, F.H., and Pugh, A.F. (1999). Elementary pre-service teacher perceptions of the greenhouse effect. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 75- 81. Epistemological and pedagogical beliefs
  11. Hofer, B.K. (2008). Personal epistemology and culture. In M.S. Khine (Ed.), Knowing, knowledge and beliefs: Epistemological studies across diverse cultures (pp. 3-22). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  12. ___________ (2006). Domain specificity of personal epistemology: Resolved questions, persistent issues, new models. International Journal of Educational Research, 45, 85-95.
  13. ___________ (2005). The legacy and the challenges: Paul Pintrich’s contributions to personal epistemology research. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 95-105.
  14. Hofer, B.K., and Pintrich, P.R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88-140.
  15. Jakobsson, A., Mäkitalo, A., and Säljö, R. (2009). Conceptions of knowledge in research on students’ understanding of the greenhouse effect: Methodological positions and their consequences for representations of knowing. Science Education, 93, 978-995.
  16. Kagan, D.M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65-90.
  17. Khalid, T. (2003). Pre-service high school teachers’ perceptions of three environmental phenomena. Environmental Education Research, 9(1), 35-50.
  18. Kilinç, A., Stanisstreet, M., and Boyes, E. (2008). Turkish students’ ideas about global warming. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 3(2), 89-98.
  19. Koballa, T.R. (1992). Persuasion and attitude change in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(1), 63-80.
  20. Kolstø, S.D. (2006). Patterns in students’ argumentation confronted with a risk-focused socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 28 (14), 1689-1716.
  21. Kolstø, S.D., et al. (2006). Science students’ critical examination of scientific information related to socioscientific issues. Science Education, 90(4), 632-655.
  22. Lane, M. (2002). Global warming non-believer. Retrieved from http://www.sitnews.us/ DaveKiffer/061106_lane.jpg, 30 July 2009.
  23. Lee, O., Lester, B.T., Ma, L., Lambert, J., and Jean-Baptiste, M. (2007). Conceptions of the greenhouse effect and global warming among elementary students from diverse anguages and cultures. Journal of Geoscience Education, 55(2), 117-125. 23ARV Cajigal and DJ Tippins
  24. Lindzen, R.S. (2006). Understanding common climate claims. In A. Zichichi & R.Ragaini (Eds.), International seminar on nuclear and planetary emergencies –34th session (pp. 189-210). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
  25. Louca, L., Elby, A., Hammer, D., and Kagey, T. (2004). Epistemological resources: Applying a new epistemological framework to science instruction. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 57–68.
  26. Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd Ed.) San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  27. Mortensen, L.O. (2007, March 21). Global warming – Doomsday called off (Part 5 of 5) [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2XALmrq3ro.
  28. Mueller, M.P. (2009). Educational reflections on the “ ecological crisis” : EcoJustice, environmentalism, and sustainability. Science and Education, 18, 1031-1056.
  29. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: Academy Press.
  30. Nuangchalerm, P. (2009). Development of socioscientific issues-based teaching for preservice science teachers. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 239-243.
  31. Pajares, M.F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
  32. Papadimitriou, V. (2004). Prospective primary teachers’ understanding of climate change, greenhouse effect, and ozone layer depletion. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 299-307.
  33. Reis, P., and Galvao, C. (2009). Teaching controversial socio-scientific issues in biology and geology classes: A case study. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 13(1), 1-24. Retrieved from http://ejse.southwestern.edu.
  34. Richardson, V. (2003). Preservice teachers’ beliefs. In J. Raths & A.C. McAninch (Eds.), Teacher beliefs and classroom performance: The impact of teacher education (pp. 1-22). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishers.
  35. Rickinson, M. (2001). Learners and learning in environmental education: A critical review of the evidence. Environmental Education Research, 7(3), 207-320.
  36. Riessman, C.K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  37. Rosenzweig, C., et al. (2008). Attributing physical and biological impacts to anthropogenic climate change. Nature, 453, 353-358. Epistemological and pedagogical beliefs
  38. Sadler, T.D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical eview of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536.
  39. Sadler, T.D., and Donnelly, L. (2006). Socioscientific argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1463-1488.
  40. Snider, V.E., and Roehl, R. (2007). Teachers’ beliefs about pedagogy and related issues. Psychology in the Schools, 44(8), 873-886.
  41. Stake, R.E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  42. Summers, M., Kruger, C., Childs, A., and Mant, J. (2001). Understanding the science of environmental issues: Development of a subject knowledge guide for primary teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 23(1), 33-53.
  43. Tobin, K. (2000). Interpretive research in science education. In A.E. Kelly & R.A. Leash (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 487-512). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  44. UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE. (2009). Copenhagen accord. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/cop_15/ application/pdf/cop15_ cph_auv.pdf, 14 February 14, 2010.
  45. WORLD WILDLIFE FUND (WWF-US). Observations on climate change in the Arctic – WWF [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=Jak1pExql0U, 02 September 2008.
  46. Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  47. Zeidler, D.L., Sadler, T.D., Simmons, M.L., and Howes, H.V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89, 357-377.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic