HomeScience and Technology Journalvol. 7 no. 2 (2018)

Production Process Optimization, And Performance Testing Of Mmsu Hydrous Bioethanol Ii As Renewable Engine Fuel

Shirley C. Agrupis | Nathaniel Ericson R. Mateo | James Paul T. Madigal | Marilou P. Lucas

Discipline: chemical, process and energy engineering

 

Abstract:

Preliminary studies on the utility of 95% Azeotrope Ethanol (MMSU 95 hBE) as oxygenate and gasohol fuel in mobile and stationary engines paved the way for the Department of Energy (DOE)-funded project, Village Scale Production of MMSU Hydrous Ethanol as Feedstock for R&D in Biofuel Trials and Anhydrous Ethanol Production. Two components of the project are reported here: (1) the scaled-up production and optimization trials of MMSU 95 hBE and (2) the performance evaluation of hydrous bioethanol as oxygenate and gasohol blend in spark ignition engines. The first component focused on the bulk production of hydrous ethanol, including experimental trials to improve the fermentation and distillation efficiencies under scaled-up conditions. Integrated studies of the first component included: 1) yeast activation period; 2) sugar concentration; and 3) energy and water-cost efficient reflux distillation system. Previous lab scale fermentation experiments used 4-6hr aerobic activation periods before yeasts were pitched into anaerobic fermentation vessels. Under ambient conditions, the set-up gave 72-76% ethanol conversion efficiency in as short as 18-24 hrs. Succeeding experiments lowered the activation period to 1hr, which improved fermentation efficiency to 85.9%. Optimum conversion efficiency for maximum ethanol yield was observed at 30% sugar concentration. Fuel wood input during distillation was reduced by half when an insulator was used to cover the distiller. Ethanol recovery by the reflux distillation system was 95-100%. Further, we were able to reduce the water consumption by 95% using a recycling system to condense the distillate. The second component of this project focused on the performance evaluation of MMSU hydrous bioethanol both as alternative oxygenate to anhydrous ethanol and as a significant component of gasohol blends. Comparison data were obtained to highlight properties of the blends as well as document performance in spark ignition engines of cars, motorcycles and water pumps. Results of these studies demonstrate the feasibility of using hydrous ethanol instead of anhydrous both as oxygenate and as significant component of gasohol blends up to a concentration of 30% hydrous ethanol. Our studies confirmed that hydrous ethanol can be effectively splash-blended with gasoline without phase separation or other problems. The studies were able to demonstrate the benefits of oxygenation and comparable engine performance, capitalizing on the change in chemical and physical properties which occur as a result of combining water, ethanol, and gasoline to optimize the efficiency at which internal combustion engines operate. While there is a slight reduction in fuel economy due to the lower energy content of hydrous ethanol, it is counteracted by increasing engine performance due to higher octane and higher heat of vaporization of ethanol and water in comparison with gasoline and anhydrous blends.



References:

  1. Borromeo, B.B., Coloma, RR. F.A., Domingo, N.D., and Tabunan, E.J.P. (2011). Performance Testing of Spark Ignition Engine Using Characterized Hydrous Ethanol Blends from Sweet Sorghum Feedstock. Undergraduate Research Study.College of Engineering. Mariano Marcos State University. City of Batac 2906.120 pp.
  2. Costa, C. R., Sodre, J.R. (2010). Hydrous Ethanol vs. Gasoline-ethanol blend: Engine Performance and Emissions. Fuel 2010; 89:287-293
  3. Domingo, J.A., Ignacio, J.A., Ariano, F.J.D, and Yadao, N.P. (2013). Fabrication and Testing of an Electric Dynamometer for Stationary Engines. Undergraduate Research Study. College of Engineering. Mariano Marcos State University. City of Batac 2906.48 pp.
  4. Karpov, S. (2007). Ethanol as a High-Octane, Environmentally Clean Component of Automotive Fuels. Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils 43.5: 355-61.
  5. Korotney, D. (1995). Water Phase Separation in Oxygenated Gasoline. www.Epa.gov/OMS/regs/fuels/rfg/waterphs.pdf. Mills, G. A, and E.E. Ecklund. (1987). Alcohols as Components of Transportation Fuels. Annual Review of Energy 12: 47-80.
  6. Orcullo Jr. N.A, (October 2007) De La Salle University-Dasmariñas, “Biofuels Initiatives in the Philippines,”. Wagner, T., D. Gray, B. Zarah, and A.
  7. Kozinski. (1979). Practicality of Alcohols as Motor Fuel. Tech. no. 790429. Chicago, Illinois: Amoco Fuels.
  8. Yamin, J., Abu-Zaid, M., Badran, O. (2006). Comparative Performance of Spark Ignition Engine Using Blends of Various Methanol Percentages with Low Octane Number Gasoline. International Journal of Environment and Pollution. Vol. 23(3):336-334.