HomeThe Advanced Social Science in Research Journalvol. 1 no. 3 (2026)

The Influence of Teachers' Professional Development on Teaching Practices and Student Achievement in Cawag Schools, Subic District

Pauline Marie F. Muñoz | Ferdinand V. Tamoria

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Teachers' professional development is an essential way to improve instruction quality, although its definite impact on student outcomes is still not well-understood in many schools. This research explored the effects of teachers' professional development on teaching meth-ods and student learning in public elementary schools in Cawag, Su-bic District, Zambales. It was designed to profile teachers and their engagement in professional development activities, to find out how teachers see the impact of these activities on their instructional meth-ods, to evaluate student academic performance, and to investigate the presence of significant differences and relationships among the vari-ables. The research extends our understanding of the topic by supply-ing localized empirical data on the role of professional learning in en-hancing classroom practice and aligning it with learner performance requirements. The research method was a quantitative descriptive-correlation study, and the sample consisted of 61 teacher-respond-ents who were selected through convenience sampling. The data col-lection instruments were a researcher-made questionnaire and the document analysis of students' academic records. The data were an-alyzed with descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis H Test, multiple re-gression analysis, and analysis of variance. The results showed that teachers frequently engaged in professional development, especially through school-based seminar, Learning Action Cell sessions, peer collaboration, and self-initiated learning. Teachers felt that profes-sional development very much impacted their educational methods, mainly supporting students' adaptation, differentiating instruction, and managing the classroom. Academic achievement of students was found to be at an overall satisfactory level, however, English and Mathematics were seen as less strong subject areas. The results of the inferential analysis showed that only classroom management was as-sociated with the length of professional development, whereas pro-fessional development participation and teaching practices were not significant predictors of student achievement. The results mean that although teachers acknowledged the effectiveness of professional de-velopment in improving their instructional practices, the effect of professional development on student achievement could not be demonstrated statistically in this study. Such an outcome can be in-terpreted as a suggestion that student learning may be affected by various other factors related to the school environment and the learner themselves, such as prior learning, attendance, parental sup-port, learning resources, and the continuation of instructional inter-ventions. Therefore, it is recommended that professional develop-ment initiatives be made more effective through ongoing coaching, in-class teaching, and the monitoring of learner outcomes.



References:

  1. Antinluoma, M., Ilomäki, L., Lahti-Nuuttila, P., & Toom, A. (2021). Practices of professional learning communities. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 617613. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.617613 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.617613
  2. Brugha, M. E., Hollow, D., & Sampson, R. (2024). Educators’ perceptions and experiences of online teacher professional development. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2024(1), Article 902. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.902 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.902
  3. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
  4. Department of Education. (2015). DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015: Policy guidelines on classroom assessment for the K to 12 Basic Education Program. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2015/04/01/do-8-s-2015-policy-guidelines-on-classroom-assessment-for-the-k-to-12-basic-education-program/
  5. Department of Education. (2016). Department Order No. 35, s. 2016: The Learning Action Cell as a K to 12 basic education program school-based continuing professional development strategy for the improvement of teaching and learning. Department of Education.
  6. Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best practices in teachers’ professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society, & Education, 7(3), 252–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.515
  7. Education Endowment Foundation. (2021). Effective professional development: Guidance report. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/guidance-reports/effective-professional-development
  8. Gore, J., Rosser, B., Jaremus, F., Miller, A., & Harris, J. (2024). Fresh evidence on the relationship between years of experience and teaching quality. The Australian Educational Researcher, 51, 547–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00612-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00612-0
  9. Heikkinen, H. L. T., Ahtiainen, R., & Fonsén, E. (2023). Perspectives on quality in teacher education and professional development. Education Sciences, 13(9), Article 937. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090937
  10. Holmqvist, M. (2021). Teachers’ collaborative professional development for inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 36(5), 819–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2020.1842974 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2020.1842974
  11. Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800
  12. Khasawneh, Y. J. A., Alsarayreh, R., Al Ajlouni, A. A., Eyadat, H. M., Ayasrah, M. N., & Khasawneh, M. A. S. (2023). An examination of teacher collaboration in professional learning communities and collaborative teaching practices. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 10(3), 446–452. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v10i3.4841 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v10i3.4841
  13. Kraft, M. A., & Falken, G. T. (2021). A blueprint for scaling tutoring and mentoring across public schools. AERA Open, 7, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211042858 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211042858
  14. Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
  15. OECD. (2021). Beyond academic learning: First results from the survey of social and emotional skills. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/92a11084-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/92a11084-en
  16. OECD. (2025). Results from TALIS 2024: The state of teaching. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/90df6235-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/90df6235-en
  17. Perry, E. (2023). Teacher professional development in changing circumstances: The impact of COVID-19 on schools’ approaches to professional development. Education Sciences, 13(1), Article 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010048
  18. Popova, A., Evans, D. K., Breeding, M. E., & Arancibia, V. (2022). Teacher professional development around the world: The gap between evidence and practice. The World Bank Research Observer, 37(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkab006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkab006
  19. Richter, E., Fütterer, T., Meyer, A., Eisenkraft, A., & Fischer, C. (2022). Teacher collaboration and professional learning: Examining professional development during a national education reform. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 68(6), 798–819. https://doi.org/10.3262/ZP2206798 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3262/ZP2206798
  20. Schult, J., Mahler, N., Fauth, B., & Lindner, M. A. (2022). Did students learn less during the COVID-19 pandemic? Reading and mathematics competencies before and after the first pandemic wave. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 33(4), 544–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2022.2061014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2022.2061014
  21. Sims, S., Fletcher-Wood, H., O’Mara-Eves, A., Cottingham, S., Stansfield, C., Goodrich, J., Van Herwegen, J., & Anders, J. (2025). Effective teacher professional development: New theory and a meta-analytic test. Review of Educational Research, 95(2). https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231217480 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231217480
  22. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707
  23. World Bank, UNESCO, & UNICEF. (2021). The state of the global education crisis: A path to recovery. World Bank, UNESCO, and UNICEF.
  24. World Bank, UNESCO, UNICEF, FCDO, USAID, & Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2022). The state of global learning poverty: 2022 update. World Bank.
  25. Wu, L. (2021). Self-directed learning: An effective way for teachers’ professional development. International Journal of New Developments in Education, 3(4), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDE.2021.030412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDE.2021.030412