HomeJPAIR Multidisciplinary Research Journalvol. 65 no. 3 (2026)

National Authority for Child Care-Regional Alternative Child Care Office (NACC-RACCO CARAGA)

Emily A. Sanogal

Discipline: Developmental psychology

 

Abstract:

Adoption telling the disclosure of adoptive status to children is a relational-cultural process that shapes trust, belonging, identity coherence, and stigma reduction. While global research emphasizes early and open disclosure, most findings come from Western contexts. This study addresses the gap in collectivist societies like the Philippines, where indigenous values such as kapwa, hiya, and pakikiramdam influence disclosure practices. The Caraga Region provides a unique socio-cultural setting for this investigation. A sequential explanatory mixed methods design was employed. Quantitative phase: Surveys with 350–400 respondents tested direct effects of disclosure practices (timing, openness, narrative coherence) on identity outcomes. Qualitative phase: 36–48 purposively selected parents participated in interviews exploring cultural orientations, relational climates, and community support. Data analysis included regression, mediation, and moderation models, complemented by thematic coding of qualitative data. Ethical approval was secured from the IRB of Caraga State University (Protocol No. CSU-IRB-2025-014). Disclosure practices significantly predicted identity outcomes (trust, belonging, coherence, stigma reduction). Relational climate mediated disclosure effects, cultural orientations moderated outcomes, and community support enhanced belonging and reduced stigma. Integration of quantitative and qualitative findings validated adoption telling as both empirically measurable and culturally embedded, leading to the development of the Relational–Cultural Disclosure Theory (RCDT). Early, open, and coherent disclosure strengthens adoptees’ identity and reduces stigma when supported by a positive relational climate and community networks. RCDT situates adoption disclosure within Filipino indigenous psychology and communal traditions, contributing to global adoption scholarship.



References:

  1. Achusi, C. N. (2025). Family and kinship structures in African communities: Implications for social work practice in Australia. International Journal for Research Trends in Social Science & Humanities, 3(2), 524-556. https://ijrtssh.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ijrtssh.vol_.3.issue2_.126.pdf
  2. Berman, A., Ruderman, M. A., Ordaz, A. C., Waterman, J., & Langley, A. (2025). Belonging and Reclaiming Identity: Understanding the Lived Experiences of Youth Adopted from Foster Care in Transracial Families. Adoption Quarterly, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2025.2557211
  3. Boyatzis, R. E., & Rochford, K. (2020). Relational climate in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Frontiers in Psychology11, 85.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00085
  4. Brown, A., & Shelton, K. (2024). Coherent lives: Making sense of adoptees’ experiences in education through narrative identity. British Educational Research Journal50(2), 495-512. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3918
  5.  Dylan, T., Harrison, D., & Durrant, A. (2022, June). Communicative Openness within Adoptive Families: The Role of Photos and Visual Communication. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 807-820). https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.353351
  6. Egan, M., O’Connor, A. B., & Egan, J. (2022). Creating a New Narrative: A theory of how adopted individuals readjust their adoptive identity in parenthood. Adoption & Fostering46(3), 318-335. https://doi.org/10.1177/03085759221112449
  7. Enriquez, V. G. (1992). From colonial to liberation psychology: The Philippine experience. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press. The Philippine Experience. https://philpapers.org/rec/ENRFCT
  8. Horstman, H. K., & Colaner, C. W. (2022). Application: Family Communication: Adoptive Family Communication. In Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methodologies: A Dynamic Approach (pp. 549-554). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-92002-9_39
  9. Moroney, D., O’Donnell, A., O’Connor, M., & Muldoon, O. T. (2025). Adoption and social identity loss: Insights from adults adopted through Ireland’s mother and baby homes. British Journal of Social Psychology64(2), e12869.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12869
  10. Naseer, S., Bouckenooghe, D., Syed, F., & Haider, A. (2024). Power of inclusive leadership: Exploring the mediating role of identity-related processes and conditional effects of synergy diversity climate in nurturing positive employee behaviors. Journal of Management & Organization30(6), 2066-2087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2023.37
  11. Tarroja, M. (2020). Indigenous Filipino psychology and adoption disclosure: Kapwa, hiya, and pakikiramdam. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 53(2), 145–162. https://pap.ph/ejournal/index.php/pjp/article/view/92
  12. Xu, Y., Li, X., & Coley, J. D. (2021). How essentialist beliefs about national groups differ by cultural origin and study abroad experience among Chinese and American college students. Asian Journal of Social Psychology24(4), 537-552. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12456