Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 7 no. 7 (2026)

Teachers’ Perceptions and Instructional Practices toward Inclusive Education: Basis for a Strategic Training Program

Miraflor B. Agunod

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Inclusive education has become a key priority in educational reform, promoting equitable access, participation, and learning opportunities for students with diverse educational needs. In the Philippines, national policies such as Republic Act No. 11650 mandate the provision of ap- propriate educational programs and support services for learners with disabilities within inclusive learning environments. This study assessed the perceptions and instructional practices of Special Education and General Education teachers regarding inclusive education in selected secondary schools in the Division of Naga City, Cebu, and examined the relationship between teachers' attitudes and their competence in im- plementing inclusive practices. A quantitative descriptive-correla- tional research design was employed involving 20 teachers, comprising 10 Special Education and 10 General Education teachers. Data were gathered using adapted versions of the Multidimensional Attitudes to- ward Inclusive Education Scale (MATIES) and the Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practices (TEIP) Scale. Descriptive statistics and Pearson cor- relation analysis were used to analyze the data. Findings revealed that both Special Education and General Education teachers demonstrated moderately positive attitudes toward inclusive education (Special Edu- cation mean = 3.13$; General Education mean = 3.11$). Teachers also reported moderately high competence in inclusive teaching practices, including knowledge of inclusive strategies (Special Education mean = 3.46$; General Education mean = 3.38$), instructional skills for diverse learners (Special Education mean = 3.03$; General Education mean = 3.10$), and classroom management and assessment strategies (Special Education mean = 3.00$; General Education mean = 3.10$). Significant positive relationships were found between teachers' attitudes and their knowledge of inclusive practices ($r = 0.86$), instructional skills ($r = 0.88$), and classroom management strategies ($r = 0.95$). The findings suggest that while inclusive education practices are increasingly evi- dent in secondary schools through differentiated instruction, collabo- rative teaching, and supportive classroom environments, challenges re- main in specialized training, assessment adaptation, and disability-spe- cific instructional competencies. Based on these results, a strategic training program was developed to strengthen teachers' preparedness, *Corresponding author: E-mail: imrajel1435@gmail.com MB Agunod , 2026 / Teachers' Perceptions and Instructional Practices toward Inclusive Education IJMABER 2824 Volume 7 | Number 7 | July | 2026 enhance inclusive instructional competencies, and promote collabora- tive support mechanisms. The expected outcome of the program is the development of a more competent, confident, and inclusive teaching workforce capable of effectively supporting learners with diverse edu- cational needs in mainstream secondary classrooms.



References:

  1. Alassaf  MA.  (2025). Teachers'  knowledge  and attitudes  toward  inclusive  education  for children    with    autism    in    mainstream schools. Frontiers    in    Education,   10,1630710. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1630710
  2. Brown JL.  (2025). Cultivating “inclusive peda-gogy” in higher education: What are the beliefs, practices and professional develop-ment needs of educators? (Doctoral disser-tation, The Open University). https://doi.org/10.21954/ou.ro.00105925
  3. Creswell  JW,  &  Creswell  JD.  (2018).  Research design:    Qualitative,   quantitative,   and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  4. Cronbach  LJ.  (1951). Coefficient  alpha  and  the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika,16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
  5. Darling-Hammond L, Hyler  ME,  &  Gardner M. (2017). Effective  teacher  professional  development. Learning Policy Institute.
  6. Department of Education. (2020). Basic educa-tion development plan 2030: Transforming Philippine basic education. Department of Education, Republic of the Philippines.
  7. Department of Education (Philippines). (2021). Policy  guidelines  on  the  provision of  educational  programs  and  services  for learners  with  disabilities  in  the  K  to  12 basic education program (DepEd Order No. 44, s. 2021).Department of Education.
  8. Department of Education. (2023). DepEd Order No.  022,  s.  2023:  Implementing guidelines on  the  school  calendar  and  activities  for the school year 2023–2024.Department of Education.
  9. Department of Education. (2024). DepEd Order No.  009,  s.  2024:  Implementing  guidelines on  the  school  calendar  and  activities  for the school year 2024–2025.Department of Education.
  10. Dignath C, Rimm-Kaufman S, Ewijk R, & Kunter M.  (2022). Teachers’ beliefs about inclusive  education  and  insights  on  what  contributes to those beliefs: A meta-analytical study.Educational   Psychology   Review, 34(2), 1037–1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09695-0
  11. Emam M M, & Al-Mahdy YFH. (2020). Teachers’ efficacy  for  inclusive  practices  in  the  Sultanate   of   Oman:   Effect   of   gender   and teaching   experience. School   Psychology International, 41(2), 170–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034319895062
  12. Etikan I, Musa SA, & Alkassim RS. (2016). Comparison  of  convenience  sampling  and  purposive sampling.American Journal of Theoretical  and  Applied  Statistics,5(1),  1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  13. Field A. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE Publications.
  14. Florian  L,  &  Black-Hawkins  K.  (2011). Explor-ing   inclusive   pedagogy.British   Educa-tional   Research   Journal,  47(1),   40–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.501096
  15. Florian L, & Spratt J. (2013). Enacting inclusion: A  framework  for  interrogating  inclusive practice. European   Journal    of   Special Needs Education, 28, 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2013.778111
  16. Galaterou  J,  &  Antoniou  AS.  (2017). Teachers' attitudes towards inclusive education: The role  of  job  stressors  and  demographic  parameters.International  Journal  of  Special Education, 32(4), 643–658.
  17. Gülsün  I,  Malinen  OP,  Yada  A,  &  Savolainen  H. (2023). Exploring the role of teachers’ attitudes  towards  inclusive  education,  their selfefficacy,  and  collective  efficacy  in  behaviour     management. Teaching  and Teacher Education, 132, 104228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104228
  18. Jugan  MB,  Reyes  NRTD,  Pepito  JC,  Capuno  RG, Pinili,  LC,  Cabigon  AFP,  &  Mamites  IO. (2024). Attitudes  of  elementary  teachers towards   inclusive   education   of   learners with  special  education  needs  in  a  public school. Online Submission,  48(1),  2173–2202. https://doi.org/10.52783/pst.487
  19. Likert  R.  (1932). A  technique  for  the  measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 5–55.
  20. Lindner KT, Schwab S, Emara M, & Avramidis, E. (2023). Do  teachers  favor  the  inclusion  of all students?  A  systematic  review  of  primary school teachers’ attitudes towards i-clusive   education. European   Journal   of Special Needs Education, 38(6), 717–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2023.2172894
  21. Macabinta  H.  (2025). Teachers’ preparedness for  behavioral  management  in  inclusive education:  A  correlational  study  on  academic  performance.Psychology  and  Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 37(8), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.370802
  22. Mahat M. (2008). The development of a psycho-metrically-sound  instrument  to  measure teachers’  multidimensional  attitudes  toward   inclusive   education.International Journal  of  Special  Education,  23(1),  82–92.
  23. Monteiro E, Kuok ACH, Correia A M, & Forlin C. (2019). Perceived  efficacy  of  teachers  in Macao and their alacrity to engage with in-clusive education.International Journal of Inclusive    Education,    23(2),    202–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1514762
  24. Moon O. (2023). Teachers’ readiness and teach-ing  performance  in  inclusive  education: Their  relationship  to  the  implementation of  inclusive  education  program. AIDE  Interdisciplinary  Research  Journal,  6,  65–110. https://doi.org/10.56648/aide-irj.v6i1.9
  25. Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, & Hoagwood K. (2015). Purpose-ful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementa-tion  research.Administration  and  Policy in  Mental  Health  and  Mental  Health  Ser-vices Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
  26. Podolsky,  A.,  Kini,  T.,  &  Darling-Hammond,  L. (2019). Does   Teaching   Experience   In-crease  Teacher  Effectiveness?  A  Review  of US Research.Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 4, 286-308. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-12-2018-0032
  27. Republic  of  the  Philippines.  (2012).  Republic Act  No.  10173:  Data  Privacy  Act  of  2012. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines.
  28. Republic  of  the  Philippines.  (2022).  Republic Act  No.  11650:  An  act  institutionalizing inclusive education for  learners with dis-abilities. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines.
  29. Rogayan DV, Jr., & Corpuz LN. (2022). Evaluat-ing the research productivity of a state uni-versity in Central Luzon, Philippines: Basis for policy recommendations.International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Ed-ucation, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i1.22099
  30. Sasikala  C.  (2023). Attitudes  towards  inclusive education   among   prospective   teachers. Shanlax International Journal of Arts, Sci-ence   and   Humanities,   11(S1),   42–46. https://doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v11iS1-Nov.6861
  31. Sharma U, & Sokal L. (2016). Can teachers’ self-reported  efficacy,  concerns,  and  attitudes toward  inclusion  scores  predict  their  actual inclusive classroom practices.Austral-asian Journal of Special Education, 40(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/jse.2015.14
  32. Sharma  U,  Aiello  P,  Pace  EM,  Round  P,  &  Subban  P.  (2021). Inservice teachers’ atti-tudes, concerns, and efficacy toward inclu-sion. Teaching   and   Teacher   Education, 101, 103305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103305
  33. Tavakol  M,  &  Dennick  R.  (2011). Making  sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
  34. UNESCO.  (2020).  Global  education  monitoring report  2020:  Inclusion  and  education—All means all. UNESCO.
  35. UNESCO.  (2021).  Reimagining  our  futures  to-gether:  A  new  social  contract  for  education. UNESCO Publishing.
  36. Yada A, Leskinen M, Savolainen H, & Schwab S. (2022). Meta-analysis  of  the  relationship between  teachers’  self-efficacy  and  attitudes  toward  inclusive  education. Teaching  and  Teacher  Education,  109,  103521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.10352
  37. Zee,  M.,  &  Koomen,  H.  M.  (2016). Teacher  self-efficacy  and  its  effects  on  classroom  processes,  student  academic  adjustment,  and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of  research.Review  of  Educational  research, 86(4), 981-1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465431562680
  38. Zhou, X., Shu, L., Xu, Z. et al. The effect of profes-sional   development   on   in-service   STEM teachers’ self-efficacy:  a  meta-analysis  of experimental studies. IJ STEM Ed 10,  37 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00422-x