Home⇛The Trinitian Researcher⇛vol. 11 no. 1 (2022)

From Initiation to Institutionalization: An Archival History of Service-Learning in a Philippine Higher Education Institution

Caroline Langcay-Balmes

Discipline: social work

 

Abstract:

This historical study reconstructs the evolution of service-learning in a Philippine higher education institution and develops a generic framework for understanding how service-learning moves from externally initiated activities toward sustained institutional practice. Using qualitative historical research and archival document analysis, the study examined institutional publications, conference materials, speeches, handbooks, program documents, reflective accounts, evaluation records, photographs, and other archival materials spanning more than two decades. The study organized documentary evidence chronologically and interpreted it through source appraisal, thematic coding, and cross-period comparison. The analysis identified four historical movements: external initiation and exposure; pedagogical contextualization; reciprocal partnership and institutional alignment; and development-oriented institutionalization. Across these movements, three recurring tensions shaped continuity: dependence on individual champions, the gap between philosophical commitment and organizational systems, and the need to shift community engagement from a unidirectional service model toward reciprocity and co-ownership. The findings indicate that institutionalization is better understood as an evolutionary process than as a single paradigm shift or policy decision. On this basis, the paper proposes a historical-evolutionary framework organized around five interacting domains: historical memory and institutional identity; champions, leadership, and governance; curriculum, pedagogy, and critical reflection; reciprocal community partnership and co- ownership; and resources, evidence, monitoring, and institutional learning. These domains are expressed across instruction, research, and extension/community engagement and progress through phases of initiation, contextualization, integration, institutionalization, and renewal. The framework offers a transferable analytic lens for higher education institutions seeking to examine their own histories and build localized, sustainable, and socially responsive service-learning systems.



References:

  1. Abenir, M. A. D., & Ma, C. H. K. (2020). Social theories and service learning: Towards building an integrated service-learning sociological framework. Journal of Community Engagement and Higher Education, 12(3), 53-68.
  2. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.
  4. Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1999). Reflection in service learning: Making meaning of experience. Educational Horizons, 77(4), 179-185.
  5. Deeley, S. J. (2015). Critical perspectives on service-learning in higher education. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137383259
  6. Furco, A., & Holland, B. A. (2004). Institutionalizing service-learning in higher education: Issues and strategies for chief academic officers. In M. Langseth & W. M. Plater (Eds.), Public work and the academy: An academic administrator's guide to civic engagement and service-learning (pp. 23-39). Anker Publishing Company.
  7. Lau, K. H., Chan, M. Y. L., Yeung, C. L. S., & Snell, R. S. (2021). An exploratory study of the community impacts of service-learning. Metropolitan Universities, 32(2), 106-128. https://doi.org/10.18060/25482
  8. Lorenzo Moledo, M. del M., Sáez-Gambín, D., Ferraces Otero, M. J., & Varela Portela, C. (2021). Reflection and quality assessment in service-learning projects: When, with whom, and why. Frontiers in Education, 5, Article 605099. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.605099
  9. Ma, C. H. K., Chiu, T., & Wei, L. T. (2019). Service-learning in Asia. Metropolitan Universities, 30(3), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.18060/23515
  10. Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044
  11. Rose, G. (2022). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (5th ed.). SAGE.
  12. Rubin, S. (1996). Institutionalizing service-learning. In B. Jacoby & Associates, Service-learning in higher education: Concepts and practices (pp. 297-316). Jossey-Bass.
  13. Santos Rego, M. A., Lorenzo Moledo, M. del M., Mella Núñez, Í., Sotelino Losada, A., Álvarez Castillo, J. L., Jover Olmeda, G., Naval, C., & Pérez Pérez, C. (2018). A guide for the institutionalization of service-learning at university level. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. https://doi.org/10.15304/op.2018.1165
  14. Sescon, J., & Tuaño, P. (2012). Service learning as a response to disasters and social development: A Philippine experience. Japan Social Innovation Journal, 2(1), 64-71. https://doi.org/10.12668/jsij.2.64
  15. Ti, C. B. W., Tang-Wong, J., & Bringle, R. G. (2021). Initiating and extending institutionalization of service-learning. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 25(2), 5-22.
  16. Xing, J., & Ma, C. H. K. (Eds.). (2010). Service-learning in Asia: Curricular models and practices. Hong Kong University Press.