Client Satisfaction Survey at Romblon State University, Philippines: Basis for Improved Public Service Delivery

Juniel  G. Lucidos,; Emelyn  R. Villanueva,; Cristina Marie  J. Balderama,; Kim Jemar  Falo,; Merian  Catajay-mani,

Client Satisfaction Survey at Romblon State University, Philippines: Basis for Improved Public Service Delivery

Cristina Marie J Balderama | Kim Jemar Falo | Emelyn R. Villanueva | Merian Catajay-mani | Juniel G. Lucidos

Discipline: Sociology

Abstract:

The Client Satisfaction Survey (CSS) conducted at Romblon State University was anchored on the objective of the Administrative Order (AO) No. 25 Inter-Agency Task Force (IATF) on the Harmonization of National Government Performance Monitoring, Information and Reporting Systems, which promotes continuous improvement in public service delivery across government institutions. This study examined client experience and satisfaction with the university’s public services during Fiscal Year 2022. A total of 2,850 respondents, composed of internal and external stakeholders, participated in the survey. The study employed a quantitative-descriptive design using convenience sampling. Statistical analyses included the computation of sample means and a 95% confidence interval to determine satisfaction levels across frontline and non-frontline services. Data were gathered through a self-structured questionnaire with a Cronbach’s Alpha reliability coefficient of 0.989. Results indicated that clients were generally “Very Satisfied” across all service quality dimensions. However, recurring concerns included slow turnaround time, overcrowding during peak transactions, limited ventilation, and insufficient personnel. To address these issues, the study recommends personnel augmentation, improved queue and workflow management systems, and facility enhancements. Continuous monitoring and datadriven service improvement strategies are essential to sustaining quality public service delivery in higher education institutions.

References:

Anjalika, W. P. W., & Priyanath, H. M. S. (2018). Effect of service quality on customer satisfaction: An empirical study of customers who have bank accounts in both public and private banks in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Marketing and Technology, 8(1), 11-36.
Baker, D. A., & Crompton, J. L. (2000). Quality, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions. Annals of Tourism Research, 27(3), 785–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00108-5
International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 9001:2015 quality management systems—Requirements. https://www.iso.org/standard/62085.html
OECD. (2020). Government at a glance 2020. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/governance/government-at-a-glance/
Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1994). SERVQUAL: Review, Critique Research Agenda. Journal of Marketing, 111-124.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298504900403
Sallis, E. (2022). Total quality management in education (4^th ed.). Routledge.
Van Ryzin, G. G. (2013). An experimental test of the expectancy‐disconfirmation theory of citizen satisfaction. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(3), 597-614. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21702
World Bank Group. (2018). Improving Public Sector Performance: Through Innovation and Inter-Agency Coordination. Global Report Public Sector Performance. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/30917