Home⇛Isabela State University Linker: Journal of Engineering, Computing and Technology⇛vol. 3 no. 1 (2026)

Enhancing Educational Equity through Transportation Accessibility: An Integrated Infrastructure Planning Approach in Rural Bangladesh

Fahim Jaman

Discipline: planning (urban, rural and regional)

 

Abstract:

This study evaluated the feasibility and impact of establishing a proposed primary school in Arjuna Union of Bhuapur Upazila, Tangail District, Bangladesh, through an integrated transportation accessibility and educational infrastructure planning framework. Arjuna Union, with a population of 26,888 and a literacy rate of 41.1%, currently has only one government primary school, indicating significant service gaps. The research combined demographic demand assessment, GIS-based transportation accessibility analysis, engineering design evaluation, financial feasibility analysis, and regression modeling to assess how improved spatial access influences educational outcomes. Travel time modeling identified underserved residential clusters, while cost-efficiency metrics evaluated investments relative to the proposed 300-student capacity. A quantitative OLS regression framework estimated the relationship between reduced travel time and increased enrollment and attendance rates. Findings suggest that integrating transportation planning with school infrastructure development can significantly reduce accessibility barriers, improve literacy rates, and enhance educational equity in rural Bangladesh. The study offers a replicable planning model that supports evidence-based infrastructure investment aligned with national education goals.



References:

  1. Adukia, A., Asher, S., & Novosad, P. (2020). Educational investment responses to economic opportunity: Evidence from Indian road construction. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 12(1), 348–376. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20180036
  2. Ahasan, M. N., Chowdhury, M., & Quamruzzaman, M. (2020). Climate change impacts on rural transportation infrastructure in Bangladesh. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 26(2), 1–12.
  3. Birdsall, N., Levine, R., & Ibrahim, A. (2005). Towards universal primary education: Investments, incentives, and institutions. European Journal of Education, 40(3), 337–349. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3496946
  4. de Armas, J., Ramalhinho, H., & Reynal-Querol, M. (2022). Improving the accessibility to public schools in urban areas of developing countries through a location model and an analytical framework. PLOS One, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262520
  5. Delamater, P. L. (2013). Spatial accessibility in suboptimally configured health care systems: A modified two-step floating catchment area (M2SFCA) metric. Health & Place, 24, 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.07.012
  6. Geurs, K. T., & van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005
  7. Habiba, U., TuzZohora Jui, F., Meem, T., & Kabir, F. (2021). Disaster and education: Impact of flood on school going children at Keshabpur Upazilla in Bangladesh. Journal of Disaster and Emergency Research, 4(1), 81–92.  https://doi.org/10.18502/jder.6028
  8. Hansen, W. G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(2), 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944365908978307
  9. Idei, R., Kato, H., & Morikawa, S. (2020). Contribution of rural roads improvement on children’s school attendance: Evidence in Cambodia. International Journal of Educational Development, 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.102131
  10. Kaiser, N., & Barstow, C. K. (2022). Rural transportation infrastructure in low- and middle-income countries: A review of impacts, implications, and interventions. Sustainability, 14(4), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042149
  11. Litman, T. (2003). Measuring transportation: Traffic, mobility, and accessibility. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 73(10), 28–32. https://vtpi.org/measure.pdf
  12. Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20(20), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013
  13. Murray, A. T. (2010). Advances in location modeling: GIS linkages and contributions. Journal of Geographical Systems, 12(3), 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-009-0105-9
  14. Porter, G. (2014). Transport services and their impact on poverty and growth in rural Sub-Saharan Africa: A review of recent research and future research needs. Transport Reviews, 34(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2013.865148
  15. Porter, G. (2016). Mobilities in rural Africa: New connections, new challenges. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2015.1100056
  16. Talen, E. (2001). School, community, and spatial equity: An empirical investigation of access to elementary schools in West Virginia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(3), 465–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00254
  17. Weiss, D. J., Nelson, A., Gibson, H. S., Temperley, W., Peedell, S., Lieber, A., Hancher, M., Poyart, E., Belchior, S., Fullman, N., Mappin, B., Dalrymple, U., Rozier, J., Lucas, T. C. D., Howes, R. E., Tusting, L. S., Kang, S. Y., Cameron, E., Bisanzio, D., & Battle, K. E. (2018). A global map of travel time to cities to assess inequalities in accessibility in 2015. Nature, 553(7688), 333–336. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25181
  18. World Bank. (2018). World development report 2018: Learning to realize education’s promise. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2018.
  19. World Bank. (2019). Bangladesh education sector review: Seeding fertile ground. World Bank Publications.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic