Home⇛Isabela State University Linker: Journal of Engineering, Computing and Technology⇛vol. 3 no. 1 (2026)

From Data to Decisions: Assessing the Role of the Philippine Rice Information System (PRiSM) in Evidence-Based Decision-Making in Davao del Sur

Bonn Gerrald P. Librando | Domingo V. Origines

Discipline: information systems

 

Abstract:

The Philippine Rice Information System (PRiSM) is a comprehensive web-based platform developed by the Department of Agriculture and the Philippine Rice Research Institute (PhilRice) to support rice sector monitoring, analysis, and evidence-based decision-making. This study employed a mixed-methods research design to evaluate PRiSM implementation in Davao del Sur through the perspectives of 12 users from nine municipalities, one city, and the provincial agriculture office. Quantitative data were collected using structured Likert-scale questionnaires, while qualitative insights were obtained through interviews and system observations. Results revealed several implementation challenges, including sustainability concerns, inadequate capacitybuilding initiatives, data quality and utilization issues, coordination gaps, limited data accessibility, and weak feedback integration mechanisms. Quantitative findings showed that overall system acceptability was below average user satisfaction with system performance was low (M = 2.42), and sustainability beyond the current administration received a very low rating (M = 2.08). Despite these limitations, respondents demonstrated a moderate intention to continue using the system (M = 3.17), recognizing its potential value for rice sector monitoring and planning. The findings suggest that PRiSM’s limitations are primarily associated with implementation and institutional support issues rather than deficiencies in its conceptual design. The study contributes empirical evidence on the operational challenges of agricultural information systems at the local government level and proposes institutional, technical, and capacity-building interventions to enhance the sustainability, usability, and decision-support value of PRiSM. Given the relatively small number of participants, findings should be interpreted within the context of the study area and participant group.



References:

  1. Aker, J. C. (2011). Dial “A” for agriculture: A review of information and communication technologies for agricultural extension in developing countries. Agricultural Economics, 42(6), 631–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574- 0862.2011.00545.x
  2. Arangurí, M., Mera, H., Noblecilla, W., & Lucini, C. (2025). Digital literacy and technology adoption in agriculture: A systematic review of factors and strategies. AgriEngineering, 7(9), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering7090296
  3. Birner, R., Daum, T., & Pray, C. (2021). Who drives the digital revolution in agriculture? A review of supply‐side trends, players and challenges. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 43(4), 1260–1285. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13145
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/designing-and-conductingmixed-methods-research-3-241842
  6. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  7. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
  8. FAO. (2024). The State of Food and Agriculture 2024. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://doi.org/10.4060/cd2616en
  9. Fuglie, K., Gautam, M., Goyal, A., & Maloney, W. F. (2020). Harvesting prosperity: Technology and productivity growth in agriculture. In Openknowledge.worldbank.org. World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/32350
  10. Hariyani, D., Hariyani, P., & Mishra, S. (2025). The role of leadership in sustainable digital transformation of the organization. Sustainable Futures, 10, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101130
  11. Heeks, R., & Bailur, S. (2007). Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2006.06.005
  12. Issa, T., & Isaias, P. (2022). User participation in the system development process. In Sustainable design: HCI, usability and environmental concerns (2nd ed., pp. 41–62). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7513-1
  13. John, L. B., & James, G. J. (2025). Geospatial big data analytics for precision agriculture: Enhancing productivity and sustainability. Journal of Scientific Reports, 10(1), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.58970/JSR.1119
  14. Kimaro, H. C., & Nhampossa, J. L. (2005). Analyzing the problem of unsustainable health information systems in less-developed economies. Information Technology for Development, 11(3), 273–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/itdj.20016
  15. Komarkova, J., Sedlak, P., Habrman, J., & Cermakova, I. (2017, July). Usability evaluation of Web-based GIS by means of a model. In 2017 International Conference on Information and Digital Technologies (IDT) (pp. 191– 197). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DT.2017.8024296
  16. Klerkx, L., Jakku, E., & Labarthe, P. (2019). A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: New contributions and a future research agenda. NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90– 91(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2019.100315
  17. Mabalay, M. R., Raviz, J., Alosnos, E., Barbieri, M., Quicho, E., Bibar, J. E. A., Barroga, M., Coñado, M., Mabalot, P., Mirandilla, J. R., Arocena, A., Maloom, J., Bello, G., Cariño, E., de Mesa, G., Detoito, N., Gonzaga, H., Martin, N., Tejada, M. P., Vives, M. J., … Laborte, A. (2022). The Philippine Rice Information System (PRiSM): An Operational Monitoring and Information System on Rice. Remote Sensing of Agriculture and Land Cover/Land Use Changes in South and Southeast Asian Countries, 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92365-5_7
  18. Mirandilla, J. R. F., Yamashita, M., & Yoshimura, M. (2025). Phenological Monitoring and Discrimination of Rice Ecosystems Using Multi-Temporal and Multi-Sensor Polarimetric SAR. Remote Sensing, 17(24), 4007. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17244007
  19. Mittal, S., & Mehar, M. (2016). Socio-economic factors affecting adoption of modern information and communication technology by farmers in India: Analysis using multivariate probit model. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 22(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2014.997255
  20. Mosleh, M. K., Hassan, Q. K., & Chowdhury, E. H. (2015). Application of remote sensors in mapping rice area and forecasting its production: A review. Sensors, 15(1), 769-791. https://doi.org/10.3390/s150100769
  21. Mulla, D. J. (2013). Twenty-five years of remote sensing in precision agriculture: Key advances and remaining knowledge gaps. Biosystems Engineering, 114(4), 358–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.08.009
  22. Mwamkinga, T. E., & Barongo, F. (2025). Assessment of the Impact of Technology on Public Administration Efficiency: A Case of Tanzania Bureau of Standards. African Journal of Empirical Research, 6(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.6.1.4
  23. Naim, M., & Boukhizzou, A. (2026). Animating the transition: How agriculture 5.0 revitalises agroecological principles. Smart Agricultural Technology, 13, 1– 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2026.101788
  24. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering: Book by Jakob Nielsen. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/books/usability-engineering/
  25. Nurdin N., Stockdale, R., & Helana Scheepers. (2020). Internal organizational factors influencing sustainable implementation of information systems: Experiences from a local government in Indonesia. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2012/109/
  26. Nxumalo, G. S., & Chauke, H. (2025). Challenges and opportunities in smallholder agriculture digitization in South Africa. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 9, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1583224
  27. Pokharel, R., Gentimis, T., Kongchum, M., Tubana, B., Adhikari, R., & Setiyono, T. (2026). Rice yield estimation based on machine learning applied to UAV remote sensing data. Remote Sensing, 18(10), 1575. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18101575
  28. Raihan, A. (2024). A systematic review of geographic information systems (GIS) in agriculture for evidence-based decision making and sustainability. Global Sustainability Research, 3(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.56556/gssr.v3i1.636
  29. Saleem, F. (2025). The role of digital technology and institutional quality for accelerating sustainable development. International Journal of Advanced Research in Economics and Finance, 7(3), 277–285. https://doi.org/10.55057/ijaref.2025.7.3.21
  30. Sen, L. T. H., Phuong, L. T. H., Chou, P., Dacuyan, F. B., Nyberg, Y., & Wetterlind, J. (2025). The opportunities and barriers in developing interactive digital extension services for smallholder farmers as a pathway to sustainable agriculture: A systematic review. Sustainability, 17(7), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073007
  31. Tiwari, V., Tulbure, M. G., Caineta, J., Gaines, M. D., Perin, V., Kamal, M., Krupnik, T. J., Aziz, M. A., & Islam, A. T. (2024). Automated in-season rice crop mapping using Sentinel time-series data and Google Earth Engine: A case study in climate-risk prone Bangladesh. Journal of Environmental Management, 351, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119615
  32. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540.
  33. Zheng, Y., Mei, L., & Chen, W. (2024). Does government policy matter in the digital transformation of farmers’ cooperatives?—A tripartite evolutionary game analysis. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 8, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1398319

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic