Home⇛Augustinian⇛vol. 26 no. 1 (2025)

3-D PhET Simulation: Enhancing Engagement for Improved Academic Performance of Grade 7 Physics Students

Alexander Jacob Cortez | Vincent Algarme | Betty Mae Barbon | Ryuji Encila | Juliana Maxine Bergantin | Joji D. Linaugo

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Student engagement plays a crucial role in a student's holistic academic development. However, engagement has evidently affected students' academic performance in recent years. This action research examined both cognitive and affective engagement to improve academic performance, using the 3-D PhET Simulation intervention. Twenty-one (21) Grade 7 students participated in SEI assessments, pre-test, post-test, and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI), pre- and post-test means and standard deviations, and LRMS evaluations, while qualitative responses were analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings revealed improved academic performance due to the simulation's interactive nature. However, results from the SEI questionnaire showed that students' cognitive and affective engagement had remained average. Despite this, the 3-D PhET Simulation proved to be efficient as a non-print instructional material, most especially in teaching complex concepts, enhancing participation, critical thinking, and collaboration. By using interactive simulations, educators can enhance student engagement and academic achievement while aligning instruction with global education standards.



References:

  1. Abdon-Liwanag, B. (2022). The influence of 3-D model biological systems in understanding cellular diversity. International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.54476/ioer-imrj/009169.
  2. Al-Obaydi, L. H., et al. (2023). What I know, what I want to know, what I learned: Activating EFL college students’ cognitive, behavioral, and emotional engagement through structured feedback in an online environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1083673.
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2022). Census and sample. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Retrieved February 6, 2026, from https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/understandingstatistics/statistical-terms-and-concepts/census-and-sample.
  4. Berstein, L. (2023, October 18). Student Engagement: Why it Matters. Xello. https://xello.world/en/blog/student-engagement/what-is-student-engagement/.
  5. Business World Online (2024, July 24). DepEd eyes better PISA results. https://www.bworldonline.com/thenation/2024/07/24/610180/deped-eyesbetterpisa-results/.
  6. Chi, C. (2023, December 9). Philippines still lags behind world in math, reading and science — PISA 2022. Philstar.com. https://www.philstar.com/ headlines/2023/12/06/ 2316732/philippines-still-lags-behind-worldmath-readingand-science-pisa-2022.
  7. Chi, C. (2024, September 19). DepEd allows schools to revert to 1-hour classes to ease teachers’ workload. Philstar.com. https://www.philstar.com/ headlines/2024/09/18/23 86219/deped-allows-schools-revert-1-hourclasses-ease-teachers-workload.
  8. Counan. (2024, March 11). Enhancing student engagement: 5 Effective tips for teachers. Strobel Education. https://strobeleducation. com/blog/enhancingstudent-engagementtips/.
  9. Department of Education (2016). Adoption of the Basic Research Agenda. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/ DO_s2016_039.pdf.
  10. Education Perfect. (2024, July). The Power ofActive Engagement. Educationperfect.com. https://www.educationperfect.com/wpcontent/uploads/2024/07/EP-WhitepaperStudent-Engagement_A4_FA-1.pdf.
  11. Kalkan, Y., & Smith, A. (2021). Peer tutoring in foreign language learning: A systematic review. System, 98,102 474. https://doi.org/10.62583/rseltl.v1i2.13.
  12. Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2022). How to interview and conduct focus groups. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000299-001.
  13. Kilag, O. (2023). Empowering Learners: Addressing Linguistic Hurdles in English Education for Senior High School Students in the Philippines. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence, 1(5). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11160620
  14. Liu, Y. et al. (2024). The impacts of learning motivation, emotional engagement and psychological capital on academic performance in a blended learning university course. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1357936.
  15. Orulebaja, Y. T., et al. (2021). Effects of multiple representations and 69 problem-solving learning strategies on physics students’ problem-solving abilities. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 9(4), 350-365. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss4.3045.
  16. Pahuriray, A. & Algara, R. (2021). Mobile-based PhilNITS reviewer design: Its functionality, reliability, usability and efficiency. International Research Journal of Science, Technology, Education, and Management. 1. 184–196. 10.5281/zenodo.5726596.
  17. Parker, E. et al. (2023). Exploring the effectiveness of peer tutoring in English language learning among younglearners. https://doi.org/10.62583/rseltl.v1i2.13.
  18. Perry, A. (2022). Student Engagement, No Learning without It. Creative Education, 13, 1312–1326. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.134079.
  19. Ramos, A. E., & Malucay, C. B. (2025). The influence of Smart Learning Communities on academic performance and engagement of Grade 9 learners. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 9(03), 5792–5813. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0421.
  20. Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsicmotivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860.
  21. Sardana, S., & Rathore, A. (2022, March 28). Effect of Language on Learning Higher Education Digest. https://www.highereducationdigest.com/effectsoflanguage-on-learning.
  22. Seidman, I. (2019). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (5th ed.). Teachers College Press. https://doi.org/10.5040.9780807777855.
  23. Tagose, R. T., Jr., & Limpot, M. Y. (2025). The Mediating Effect of 21st Century Skills on the Relationship between Learning Environment and Self-Directed Learning. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 25(8). https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i82305.
  24. Wang, M., & Bu, S. (2022). Application of 3D modeling technology in teaching. https://doi.org/10.23977/curtm.2022.051409.
  25. Wilson, K. et al. (2020b). Modeling in the classroom: Making relationships and Systems visible. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-11-0255.
  26. Zhu, G. et al. (2021). Curriculum design for social, cognitive and emotional engagement in Knowledge Building. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00276-9

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic