PITFALLS OF TEACHERS ON MODULAR DISTANCE LEARNING: BASIS FOR A PROPOSED ACTION PLAN
Rolando R Mairina | Domingo M Cabarteja | Jeger P. Paragas
Abstract:
The study was conducted to determine the pitfalls encountered by grade five teachers during modular teaching and learning. Specifically, it aimed to find out the pitfalls encountered by teachers along with students’ comprehension, students’ academic behavior, monitoring of students’ education, and physical interaction with the learners. The personal profile of teachers, out of the total respondents (56), most of the teachers are female-dominated. Most of them belong to the age bracket of 34 to 45 and most of the teachers are married. Most of the teachers had attended post-graduate studies. Most respondents are still young in the service, holding Teacher 2 and Teacher 3 positions, and attending local, national, and regional training. On the level of pitfalls encountered by teachers in modular teaching and learning, most respondents experienced a slight gravity level in the four aspects. The computed average weighted mean along comprehension is 2.50, along academic behavior is 2.54, along monitoring of students’ performance is 2.58, and along physical interaction is 2.79. All have an equivalent value of moderately grave. There is a specific profile of teachers that is significantly related. Age is significantly associated with monitoring students’ learning. The computed r value is .270, while the calculated significance level is 0.04. Training attended by the teachers is significantly related to some aspects of students’ comprehension, (computed sig. value is 0.04 and physical interaction is .02), which is lower than the .05 level of significance. The grade five teachers who served as respondents are mostly female dominated; they are in their early forties and married. Most of them are attending post-graduate studies and have attended relevant training. Second, the level of teachers’ pitfalls is mostly moderately grave. In addition, age is significantly related to monitoring, training is significantly associated substantially with physical interaction and comprehension.
References:
- Arcebuche, J. V. M. & Bernardino, M. N. R. (2022). “Participation” In Online Discussion Forum in Distance Education: An Autoethnographic Inquiry. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 25-37. www.ujer.org/vol2no1/article124
- Bagood, J. B. (2020). Teaching-learning modality under the new normal. Philippine Information Agency. https://pia.gov.ph/features/articles/1055584
- Bandura, S. (2018, February 5). Social Learning Theory. Retrieved from Simplypsychology.org website: https://www.simplypsychology.org/bandura.html
- Bernardo, J. (2020, July 30). Modular Learning most preferred parents: DepEd. ABS-CBN News. https://news.abscbn.com/news/07/30/20/modular-learning-most-preferred-by-parents-deped.
- Cañete, A. M., Hitgano, A. R., Nuñez, E. M., Talamo, R. M., & Bellen, J. A. (2023). A Lesson Study on Teaching Impulse and Momentum in the New Normal. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 57-66. www.ujer.org/vol2no1/article127
- Charles, C. Building Classroom Discipline. Google Books. https//triftbook.com 2012.
- Dangle, Y. R. P., & Sumaoang J. D. (2020). The implementation of modular distance learning in the Philippine secondary public schools. 3rd International Conference on Advanced Research in Teaching and Education. Retrieved from https://www.dpublication.com/abstract-of-3rd-icate/27-427/
- FlipScience. (2020, October 5). 'Tagapagdaloy’: How Filipino parents can help ensure successful modular distance learning. FlipScience - Top Philippine Science News and Features for the
Inquisitive Filipino. https://www.flipscience.ph/news/features-news/tagapagdaloy-modular-distance-learning.
- Francisco, CDC. (2020). Effectiveness of the Online Classroom form Flexible Learning. International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research. Vol 4.
- Gershoff, Elizabeth T. Child Development Perspect(Spanking and Child Development), Published Onlne.2013. Glavin, Terry. Sixth Extinction. Mc Mc Millan, Publisher.
- Lewis, Riley P. Why did you Do that? Teachers Explain the Use of Legal Agression in the Classroom Teaching and Teacher Education.2021
- Malipot, M. H. (2020, August 4). Teachers air problems on modular learning system. Manila Bulletin. Retrieved from https://mb.com.ph/2020/08/04/teachers-air-problems-on-modular-learning-system/
- Martineau, M. D., Charland, P., Arvisais, O., & Vinuesa, V. (2020). Education and COVID-19: challenges and opportunities. Canadian Commission for UNESCO. Retrieved from https://en.ccunesco.ca/idealab/education-and-covid-19-challenges-and-opportunities
- OECD. (2020). Strengthening online learning when schools are closed: The role of families and teachers in supporting students during the COVID-19 crisis. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/strengthening-online-learning-when-schools-are-close d-the-role-of-families-and-teachers-in-supporting-students-during-the-covid-19-crisis-c4ecba6c
- Quinones, M. T. (2020, July 3). DepEd clarifies blended, distance learning modalities for SY 2020-2021. Philippine Information Agency. https://pia.gov.ph/news/articles/1046619.
- Ramos, N. L. (2023). The Efficacy of the Online Educational Community. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation. 1(1), 24- 32. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7377948.
- Sun, F.C. Rachel. Development and Evaluation of Positive Adolescents. Springle Verlog, Singapore, 2012
- Thorndike, E. (2017). Contribution to the Field of Psychology. Retrieved from Verywell Mind website: https://www.verywellmind.com/edwardthorndike-biography-1874-1949-27
- Tria, J. Z. (2020, June 3). The COVID-19 Pandemic through the Lens of Education in the Philippines: The New Normal. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341981898_The_COVID19_Pandemic_through_the_Lens_of_Education_in_the_Philippines_The_New_Normal