HomeThe Rizalian Researchervol. 10 no. 1 (2023)

AMPLIFYING THE BARRIERS OF DISTANCE LEARNING AMIDST COVID 19 PANDEMIC: ACCOUNTS OF TEACHERS

Mary Ann L Secular | Rosil B Cindy

 

Abstract:

The main objective of this study was to explore and investigate the lived experiences, coping mechanisms, and insights learned by elementary school teachers on the barriers they have encountered in the implementation of distance learning. A qualitative approach to phenomenological research design from ten teachers of elementary school was coded and presented. Three themes in figure three were mentioned by the ten (10) selected teachers of Malita, North District, who were the chosen participant for a virtual interview. The themes mentioned in figure three were the barriers encountered by the elementary school teachers in the implementation of distance learning which included limited technical experience, poor internet connectivity and resistance to change. Meanwhile, figure four themes described by the teachers as coping mechanisms that included positive well-being, poor internet connectivity and resistance to change. These were the themes observed during the discussion and were described by the respondents. Through their lived experiences and coping strategies, we generate new knowledge in handling the barriers in distance learning. Lastly, the educational insights learned from the experiences of the teachers that cited equity and inclusion were presented in the distance learning setup, independent learning and equipping teachers of technological competence. These were the themes generated as insights of elementary school teachers regarding their experiences in the implementation of distance learning



References:

  1. Abuhammad, S.O.F. Khabour, K.H. Alzoubi COVID-19 contact-tracing technology: acceptability and ethical issues of usePatient Prefer. Adherence, 14 (2020), pp. 1639-1647 CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakalar, B. (2018). Book Review: Justice on both sides: Transforming education through restorative justice. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 2(2), 145-149.
  3. Berge, Z.L., Muilenburg, L.Y., and Haneghan, J.V. (2002). Barriers to distance education and training: Survey results. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(4), 409-418.
  4. Bransford, J. (Eds.)( 2005) Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able To Do. Jossey-Bass.
  5. Borup, J., West, R. E., Graham, C. R., & Davies, R. S. (2014). The adolescent community of engagement framework: A lens for research on K-12 online learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(1), 107–129.
  6. Brooks, S.K.; Webster, R.K.; Smith, L.E.; Woodland, L.; Wessely, S.; Greenberg, N.; Rubin, G.J. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. Lancet 2020, 395, 912–920.
  7. Brooks,S. K L.E. Smith, R.K. Webster, D. Weston, L. Woodland, I. Hall, G.J. Rubi The impact of unplanned school closure on children’s social contact: rapid evidence review Euro Surveill., 25 (13) (2020), p. 2000188 Google Scholar
  8. Clark, R.C.; Mayer, R.E. E-Learning and the Science of Instruction, 4th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016.
  9. Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S. (2001). Beyond Certainty: Taking an Inquiry Stance on Practice, In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Teachers Caught in the Action: Professional Development that Matters. New York: Teachers College
  10. Cole, K, Simkins, M. & Penuel, W. (2002). Learning to Teach with Technology: Straegies for Inservice Professional Development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10 (3), 431-455.
  11. Cross, K.P. (2001). Adults as learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  12. Dai, D., & Lin, G. (2020). Online home study plan for postponed 2020 spring semester during the COVID-19 epidemic: A case study of tangquan middle school in Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China. Best Evidence in Chinese Education, 4(2), 543-
  13. DOH. (2020). Department of Health PhEhrman, M. (1990). Psychological factors and distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 4(1), 10-24.
  14. Huang, R.H., Liu, D.J., Tlili, A., Yang, J.F., Wang, H.H., et al. (2020). Handbook on Facilitating Flexible Learning During Educational Disruption: The Chinese Experience in Maintaining Undisrupted Learning in COVID-19 Outbreak. Beijing: Smart Learning Institute of Beijing Normal University.
  15. Iverson, H. L., Lewis, M. A., & Talbot III, R. M. (2008). Building a framework for determining the authenticity of instructional tasks within teacher education programs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 290–302.
  16. Hunter, L., & St Pierre, L. (2016). Online Learning: Report to the Legislature.
  17. Jogan, S. (2019). Self-Learning Module in the Achievement and Retention of Higher Secondary Students in English
  18. Joshi, Amit, Muddu Vinay, and Preeti Bhaskar. 2020. Impact of coronavirus pandemic on the Indian education sector: Perspectives of teachers on online teaching and assessments. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. [CrossRef]
  19. Kamau, J. (2007). Retraining primary school teachers against diminishing resources: Is distance education the answer? Conference paper, UNESCO, second regional seminar for Africa, Accra Ghana; UNESCO. Kember, D. (1989). A longitudinal-process model of drop-out from distance education. Journal of higher education, 60(3), 278-301.
  20. Kemp and Smelie, (1989) Planning, Producing and Using Instructional Media, New York: Harper & Row,
  21. Ko, S., & Rossen, S. (2017). Teaching online: A practical guide. Routledge.
  22. Kruger, R. A. and Casey, M. A. (2000) .Focus Groups: A practical guide for Applied Research, 3rd ed . London: SAGE.
  23. Laster Pirtle, W.N. Racial Capitalism: A Fundamental Cause of Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic Inequities in the United States. Health Educ. Behav. 2020.
  24. Lee, M., & Figueroa, R. (2012). Internal and external indicators of virtual learning success a guide to success in k-12 virtual learning. Distance Learning, 9(1), 21-28.